klennop
New member
I did a search just haven't really found what I am looking for.
I have always run BFG AT or MT's on my past vehicles. Loved the tires, only complaint was the price but they were worth it in the end because they seemed to last a long time.
Now I am looking for AT's for the 4Runner = 265/65/18
I want to go for the BFG's but I really want to give these Hankooks a try. Here is what I have come up with:
I need a tire that is good in pretty much everything, especially deeper snow. I have went through quite a bit with the BFGs where I surprised myself. I know they work well for me. I a fine with the on road manners also.
The tread especially on the sides seems less aggressive on the HK's vs the BFG. So anyone with snow experience between the 2 tires, please help.
The road noise on the HK's is probably less because of the less aggressive tread plus the pattern, but that doesn't bother me too much since I was fine with past BFG's.
Not sure about the mileage I will get out of them, comparing.
I read a comparison on them online where the testers were impressed with the HK's but that test seemed more in rock/desert stuff. I am in the snow sand, mud, mix stuff. So I can't really get much from that test.
I also noticed neither has the snowflake on them, which surprised me a bit.
The price is about $350 cheaper for the HK's, which is considerable. The price being a big difference, I am having a hard time making the decision. I could buy the HK's take another $200 and put an exhaust on.
Maybe it is also the whole BFG is the standard in AT tires so giving the HK's a chance kind of scare me, like making a $700 mistake.
I have also looked into the Revo2 but I am nixing that one since I think it is even less aggressive than the HK and costs more. Also the Geolander seems to be the same as the HK. So I would prefer the BFG or HK.
Any help, advise or suggestions would be great!
Thanks in advance!
I have always run BFG AT or MT's on my past vehicles. Loved the tires, only complaint was the price but they were worth it in the end because they seemed to last a long time.
Now I am looking for AT's for the 4Runner = 265/65/18
I want to go for the BFG's but I really want to give these Hankooks a try. Here is what I have come up with:
I need a tire that is good in pretty much everything, especially deeper snow. I have went through quite a bit with the BFGs where I surprised myself. I know they work well for me. I a fine with the on road manners also.
The tread especially on the sides seems less aggressive on the HK's vs the BFG. So anyone with snow experience between the 2 tires, please help.
The road noise on the HK's is probably less because of the less aggressive tread plus the pattern, but that doesn't bother me too much since I was fine with past BFG's.
Not sure about the mileage I will get out of them, comparing.
I read a comparison on them online where the testers were impressed with the HK's but that test seemed more in rock/desert stuff. I am in the snow sand, mud, mix stuff. So I can't really get much from that test.
I also noticed neither has the snowflake on them, which surprised me a bit.
The price is about $350 cheaper for the HK's, which is considerable. The price being a big difference, I am having a hard time making the decision. I could buy the HK's take another $200 and put an exhaust on.
Maybe it is also the whole BFG is the standard in AT tires so giving the HK's a chance kind of scare me, like making a $700 mistake.
I have also looked into the Revo2 but I am nixing that one since I think it is even less aggressive than the HK and costs more. Also the Geolander seems to be the same as the HK. So I would prefer the BFG or HK.
Any help, advise or suggestions would be great!
Thanks in advance!