Iowa4Runner
New member
Clarke,
...These types of systems are great on boats, bridges and many other things. I accept that applying them onto a car is like driving a nail by hitting it with a pry-bar. It'll work, sort of. It will get the nail in if you work it just right but the pry-bar as a hammer leaves a lot to be desired.
Open up a can of that engineering techno on us:cheers:
I don't have a whole can, but maybe a crumb of engineering techno will be of some use. As others have said, traditional cathodic protection uses a DC electrical current that flows between a cathode (the object you want to preserve) and a sacrificial anode. Even with the patented super magical capabilities of the CounterAct system, I seriously doubt there's enough electrostatic "current" flowing between the chassis and the anode to have any beneficial effect. But... It may be the case that an electrostatic charge applied to the chassis could create a potential difference between it and the film of corrosive liquid that's substantial enough to reduce rate of corrosion.
Corrosion doesn't occur unless current is flowing and current doesn't flow unless there's a potential difference. Maybe the CounterAct system works by opposing the potential difference that's created when salt water comes in contact with iron. That's one theory anyway...