Finally hit 100,000 miles! Reliability- WOW!

This guy is claiming that in 8 years, he's had no CV leaks, no t-case actuator failure, no head gasket failure, no frozen brake calipers, no brake booster failure, and none of the other rampant problems we all face with these Toyotas. I find that extremely hard to believe, but I will take his word for it. And I predict that in the next 100K he's going to be spending money hand over fist to keep up.

I've never had any of those issues with my '06 (almost 90k miles)... aside from a slight post-lift CV boot leak that I over-reacted to! I ended up rebooting the factory CV axle-shafts and haven't had any further trouble. If it was kept stock, it probably would've never happened.

I think it really depends on which area of the country you live in... the "rust-belt" beats anything to an early death, while out west things seem to last much longer. As with all things mechanical, preventative maintenance helps a lot, but things wear out over time regardless of the name on the badge.

Without considering brand loyalty, just look at how well a vehicle holds value. Compare a Toyota 4Runner to a Nissan Xterra, or a 4Runner to a Ford Explorer... I think that says a lot. I've owned several makes of vehicles [1 Pontiac, 2 Fords, 1 Jeep, 1 Honda, 4 Subarus (still have 2), 1 BMW, 1 Mazda (still have), 4 Toyotas (still have 1)] and have had pretty good luck with all of them, but Toyota might have the best record for me personally.
 
118k very hard miles and still on factory xreas suspension.

Had the CV band leaks but they were easily fixed. Have this but it's only a nuisance and a non-issue in high range. The booster accumulator runs frequently but that's been the case for at least a couple of years and it's still the same. We'll see.

That's it on a truck that's been used very hard. Even the sunroof works well and I've not been kind to it except to use it often which I think is a big help.

Overall, very happy.
 
Last edited:
I've never had any of those issues with my '06 (almost 90k miles)... aside from a slight post-lift CV boot leak that I over-reacted to! I ended up rebooting the factory CV axle-shafts and haven't had any further trouble. If it was kept stock, it probably would've never happened.

I think it really depends on which area of the country you live in... the "rust-belt" beats anything to an early death, while out west things seem to last much longer. As with all things mechanical, preventative maintenance helps a lot, but things wear out over time regardless of the name on the badge.

Without considering brand loyalty, just look at how well a vehicle holds value. Compare a Toyota 4Runner to a Nissan Xterra, or a 4Runner to a Ford Explorer... I think that says a lot. I've owned several makes of vehicles [1 Pontiac, 2 Fords, 1 Jeep, 1 Honda, 4 Subarus (still have 2), 1 BMW, 1 Mazda (still have), 4 Toyotas (still have 1)] and have had pretty good luck with all of them, but Toyota might have the best record for me personally.

I've owned 3 vehicles in my young life...I'm 35. My 1st was a chevy cavalier, my 2nd was a 2003 Tundra...and my 3rd is my 4Runner. I had no issues with the Tundra but I was doing traveling work and wanted an SUV.
 
That's funny, considering that Toyota is #2 in the world with recalls. And guess who's in first place? Not Chrysler.

And Chrysler had a 5-speed automatic in the Grand Cherokee before Toyota had one in the 4Runner...and said transmission has proven to be bulletproof. So bulletproof, in fact, that it's been used behind Jeeps with diesels and Ram 3500 Hemi pickup engines for years.

I'll grant you that BMW makes low quality stuff, but I think most people here know by now that I will not let Chrysler bashing slide on the forums. :hand:

This guy is claiming that in 8 years, he's had no CV leaks, no t-case actuator failure, no head gasket failure, no frozen brake calipers, no brake booster failure, and none of the other rampant problems we all face with these Toyotas. I find that extremely hard to believe, but I will take his word for it. And I predict that in the next 100K he's going to be spending money hand over fist to keep up.

First off, your assumption that more recalls= bad company is close minded and fairly erroneous, much akin to most liberal politician's beliefs on gun control, because it fails to take into account a whole slew of real data. Toyota recalls serious and ridiculous stuff, the shear number of recalls, TSBs, and campaigns Toyota has are laughable in some respects because many are not serious at all, but we do have some serious quality issues in the last five or so years, not debating that (in fact I do tend to laud that as well as their current warranty scheme.) Chrysler has a HUGE history of never recalling serious items until forced to (I have yet to find even a TSB mentioning their horrible issues with Hemi engines, least of which is dropping valve seats, I believe though they did come out with a campaign to add stickers to their exploding intake manifolds AFTER they injured and killed a couple guys!), even then they blamed customers and everyone but themselves. Toyota hasn't gone bankrupt twice, hasn't had to be saved by the government and then subsequently sold and saved by Italians for their horrible reputation and quality (that speaks volumes considering, so far even GM and Ford who had quality issues managed to stay afloat and so did Toyota in the face of a Tsunami and bad PR on mostly over-exaggerated pedal issues [there are a small number of legitimate claims of unintended-acceleration, but most of it was owner stupidity, please reference any of the pedal threads for more information]).

I fail to see your point about the 5 speed transmissions, they still have issues with them, granted their not as much a pile as their 3.7L V6's with their sticking valves, the horrible disintegrating Dodge Ram Dashboards, large amount of issues in the JGC over a few generations, the Liberties are garbage, Dodge Neon? do we even need to go into that? Or how about the Seabring? Crossfire? Town and Country? All with various major reliability issues over the last 10 years. Or the fact that Chrysler computers are probably one of the most failed components in their brand, there's a reason Chrysler computers are a couple hundred dollars and most Asian ones are in the thousands and its not because the Asians mark crap up (alright fine they do) its because most of their units don't go as bad.

You're brand loyalty is admirable to a fault, it really is; but I have been dealing with used cars of various brands for years now among my normal work and I see a clear pattern in the quality of various vehicles. The top two brands with the most horrible quality of vehicles is BMW & Chrysler, time and time again these two brands roll into our shop with nothing but problems and usually ranging anywhere from 20-100k+ miles on them and most of them are barley worth even fixing. Toyota tends not to be as bad, GM is hit or miss depending on the model (the older 3.1 & 3.4 V6s are leaking monstrosities), Ford is also hit or miss (their V8's are problem childs for high mileage service because of their continued spark plug issues), Nissan is not that great (we're seeing a lot of CVT issues in the 60k+ ranging from noise to failure), Mercedes is also hit or miss, Volvos tend to be beat to hell, Hondas are also hit or miss (LOTS of transmission problems I the '00-'05 range on their CUVs and vans.) Hell even "Newer" Toyotas aren't that great and their quality is slipping in the past few years (they're not Chrysler & BMW bad, but they're getting Old GM bad in my view)

In short, congratulations you own a Chrysler that didn't explode into a pile of garbage! You own the Jesus of the Domestic world! But reality is, we see a small percentage of owners on this forum, with a smaller percentage of people who have issues in their 4th gens; the truth is the Brake booster issue is a small one when compared with the cross section of owners. The headgasket issue is something Toyota needs to address but is also smaller than many other issues, the T-Case failures are mostly due to improper care on the owner's part (i.e. RTFM and exercise your 4WD system properly like any other 4WD vehicle), the CV leaks are probably the most notorious but relatively benign issue with the 4th gens.

I'm not paid by Toyota to shove Rainbows and Unicorns up everyone's arse and many members have seen me not pull punches with Toyota when it comes to mistakes on their part and their dwindling quality (I bring it up every now and then in the 5th gen forums and 4th gen forums when these types of conversations come up). But Toyota has managed to maintain a level of quality above most manufacturers over all, while some brands have consistently maintained a crap reputation, crap quality, crap customer service, and have been all but been gutted and turned into Lasagna in the past 20-30 years. So feel free to defend whoever you want? That doesn't mean they deserve it and if Toyota keeps up what they are doing lately, they won't see me defending them either because they won't be "good quality" anymore in my eyes. GM and Ford are making good products and Hyundai & Kia are cranking out amazingly well built cars with great value, I base my support of Toyota vs. Chrysler on my hands-on experience, numerous (and we're talking about 50+ individual shops and owners and drivability techs who float around fixing crap) conversations, and data I have seen over the years.

To the OP-
Once again Congratulations on your very happy Toyota, may it bring you many more trouble-free miles and I am sorry for throwing that wall of text on your thread.
 
Last edited:
Already had the pedal changed a long while back. This is something different. From the Toyota Bulletin

This is a Limited Service Campaign. Please contact your authorized Toyota dealer and schedule an appointment to have this campaign completed before 8/7/2015.

On July 24, 2013, the settlement of claims for Economic Loss arising from allegations of unintended acceleration was approved. As part of this settlement, Toyota will install Smart Stop Technology on certain model and model year vehicles. This feature will cut engine power in case of simultaneous application of both the accelerator and brake pedal at certain speeds and in certain driving conditions.

This is basically software that has not been released yet for the 4Runner. There is a BST Recall for the Corollas where we install this software, I would just ignore it; worst case you'll have to sign a waiver whenever they come out with the software (as far as I know it isn't coming out anytime this year.)
 
That's funny, considering that Toyota is #2 in the world with recalls. And guess who's in first place? Not Chrysler.

And Chrysler had a 5-speed automatic in the Grand Cherokee before Toyota had one in the 4Runner...and said transmission has proven to be bulletproof. So bulletproof, in fact, that it's been used behind Jeeps with diesels and Ram 3500 Hemi pickup engines for years.

I'll grant you that BMW makes low quality stuff, but I think most people here know by now that I will not let Chrysler bashing slide on the forums. :hand:

This guy is claiming that in 8 years, he's had no CV leaks, no t-case actuator failure, no head gasket failure, no frozen brake calipers, no brake booster failure, and none of the other rampant problems we all face with these Toyotas. I find that extremely hard to believe, but I will take his word for it. And I predict that in the next 100K he's going to be spending money hand over fist to keep up.

My '04 with 132k has had "0" issues. . .nadda, none. Chrysler wouldn't do a recall unless forced by the court and a slew of major lawsuits. Their trucks rust like crazy and cars start to rattle and degrade when it leaves the showroom floor. Yes there are some models that seem to do pretty well, but overall quality is horrible.
 
hardly in half. Its the lower portion to avoid sticking on mats, nowhere close to half the pedal.

From the reports I've read on here, most people said it was half the pedal, I refused it on mine because I have weathertech mats and a size 13 shoe so I don't know, but I've seen pics of some tiny gas pedals so IDK, maybe they dialed it back
 
I had a 97 Jeep Wrangler that I drove to 147k miles and had to replace:

1. Power steering pump.

2. Exhaust manifold got some cracks in it.
… and a couple of soft tops.

Other than that it was all maintenance. Oil changes, brakes, tires, bulbs, wipers etc.

I have a 2004 4Runner with 123k miles on it. So far it's needed:

1. Inner axle seals are a little leaky. Not worth fixing (yet).

2. The drivers seat is a little creaky in cold weather. Annoying but not really 'broken'.

3. The exhaust manifold has cracks in it.

The rest has all been maintnenace.Oil changes, brakes, tires, bulbs, wipers, timing belt.

However, the Toyota 3rd brake light was a bit of a pain because it's LED and would have been expensive had I not found a new one.

I had a 2002 VW GTI that I drove to 132k miles. It needed:

1. Coil Pack - replaced free under recall

2. Window regulator - replaced free under recall (cheap plastic piece)

Other than that it was just maintenance.

Maybe I'm just lucky. Maybe it's because I take care of my cars. I don't know. I've like each one, they were all suited to different purposes.

My 4Runner is the quietest/safest feeling.

The GTI was the most fun to drive. But had a couple of rattles and wasn't suited to a family.

The Jeep was a blast but had the least creature comforts. No AC, no power windows (no windows, really, just zippered plastic flapss). No cruise control. Simple machine. Inline 6 engine easy to work on.

This Toyota really feels like it's got a LOT of life left in it.
 
So the faulty gas cap is the ONLY problem you've had in 8 years? If that's the case you definitely have a gem on your hands. Never ever let it go.

Most if not all vehicles should be able to get 100k miles with minimal repairs.

My wife had an 96 Accord that we had it's first repair at 240k miles (not counting PM like oil changes, tune-ups, brakes...etc). And that repair cost us a total of $4.

My 05 4runner now has over 240k miles. Only issue is the reoccurring front brake caliper problems. Besides the calipers...no other issues what-so-ever.

As for recalls determining how reliable is..well that's just absurd.

I'll take Toyota's PROVEN reliability over Chryco any day of the week.
 
Threads like this baffle me, I've owned Toyotas since the early 80's because I've liked them. Sure, I've had some others as second cars during that time too. The point I'll add is that just because I like them doesn't mean I'll argue if you think otherwise. I simply don't care, I have no need to defend what I drive and don't know why people do. Same goes for criticizing people's preferences, who cares?

:noidea:
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,089
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top