I think you're missing my point the vast majority isn't enough 100% is enough also we are a part of society and we owe it to our fellow man to act responsibly. I agree totally that we need to enforce current laws and really change the way we deal with mental health. I also am not trying to speak on behalf of anyone, I am saying we need to start a national conversation and reach a consensus. this is a democracy, or hadn't you heard.
I think most would agree that a 60 round magazine serves no useful purpose. the 3/10ths of a second argument is neat and all if you want to focus on the negative, I would encourage people to try and support the positive. I hear you, reducing magazine counts won't fix the problem. real question, what benefit do they provide? what material benefit will be lost without them, I mean you just busted your whole argument if you can reload a 10 round magazine so fast, why do you need a 60 round? same thing with a bump stock ok so someone can duplicate that with a drill and a shoe string, well ok great so then you won't miss them... what useful purpose does a bump stock provide a normal responsible law abiding gun owner? I think there are some easy ways to make sense of guns in this country, but as a gun owner I can assure you I wouldn't shed a tear if these things went away tomorrow, that said, and as I already pointed out I think there's nothing wrong with 12, 14, 15 round capacity so my whole point with my first post is instead of living in the ridiculous and dealing in absolutes why not have an intelligent discussion about where a reasonable mutually agreeable limit can be found?
