HUMMER H3 vs 2005 4runner (base models)

[gshabanov]

Engine type I-5
Engine displacement 211 cu.in.
Engine horsepower 220-hp @ 5,600 rpm
Engine torque 225 lbs.-ft. @ 2,800 rpm
Valvetrain DOHC
Valves 20
Engine bore x stroke 3.7" x 4.0"
Compression ratio 10.00 to 1
Fuel tank capacity 23 gal.
Curb weight 4,700 lbs.
GVWR 5,850 lbs.
Max. trailer weight 4,500 lbs.
Maximum GCWR 8,000 lbs.
Exterior length 186.7"

 

[Sac State]

Whoppee, a rebadged Colorado. That engine couldn't move out of its own way. Imagine the gremlins that first, second, third....year vehicle will have.

 

[bulldog-yota]

Just had to mess wiht the poll

 

[Good Times]

Just had to mess wiht the poll

And just because of that, we're gonna have to place a temp ban on u!!!!

 

[Boaz]

the inline 5 banger is the most worthless piece o shit ever! I test drove a colorado once and was laughing at how weak and :gay: the motor was! PLus the H3 weights in at 4700 lbs with a whopping 220 HP and 225 torque... what sissy ass ride!

 

[TranceKrayz]

haha is this poll a joke???

you can compare that thing to a RAV4 and it'll still get its ass WHOOPED!!!

great....now i'm going to have to deal with H3 drivers who think they can roll with the H2's who strut like they're in the same league as the H1's. :bash:

 

[EDGE]

what a slow truck thats gonna be when they put dubs on them

is that the base engine

 

[kdx2000]

I know that this is a Yota site and most of the people are biased like me. Even if I had the money, I wouldn't buy an H2, I just think they are bafugly, besides they are made by GM. The only GM vehicle I own is my 67' Firebird. :bash:

 

[Thai]

H3 will be junk with it's weak engine (no low end torque) and heavy ass. Here are some photos of production model:

http://www.toyota-4runner.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3620

See the last page of the thread for pics. I have added some new pics of it off-roading.

 

[TranceKrayz]

You don't even have to be biased to admit it's crap. Even the H2 owners will be ashamed of it. Now they'll understand how the H1 owners feel about them. :arrow:

 

[RonMAIDEN]

Off Road magazine said it did well on it's test runs in Moab but that won't make me applaud one but time will tell and I can't believe they put a wussy engine in it.

 

[Northof49]

You don't even have to be biased to admit it's crap. Even the H2 owners will be ashamed of it. Now they'll understand how the H1 owners feel about them. :arrow:

:lmao: So true....

 

[gshabanov]

haha is this poll a joke???

you can compare that thing to a RAV4 and it'll still get its ass WHOOPED!!!

great....now i'm going to have to deal with H3 drivers who think they can roll with the H2's who strut like they're in the same league as the H1's. :bash:

Yea the poll is ment to be a joke.
But seriously why did they deside so late in the game to put out such a vehicle. HP an TQ is way above 250 on most Mid Sized SUVs. I do like the design. But to each its own.

 

[XM DUDE]

I looked at the H3 and The Runner stomps it 8 ways to sunday!
My hard erned money would go to the Runner that way I can sleep at night knowing I diden't just flush $40k down the tolet!