sport2004
Member
lol...to me the only thing i don’t like about the defender tire is the look .
They look like a tire my grandma would have on her buick .
lol...to me the only thing i don’t like about the defender tire is the look .
They look like a tire my grandma would have on her buick .
In my opinion if you have a 4x4 and go off road you need AT tires. Otherwise what's the point in having a vehicle like this.
In my opinion if you have a 4x4 and go off road you need AT tires. Otherwise what's the point in having a vehicle like this.
In my opinion if you have a 4x4 and go off road you need AT tires. Otherwise what's the point in having a vehicle like this.
If you extend that thought, then why the 4Runner Limited?
unpopular opinion: if you have a daily driver AT tires are not worth it. even if you offroad occasionally. and don't tell me they perform good in winter. if you've had dedicated winter tires then moved to AT in the winter, there is no comparison. 3 peak don't matter.
I have michelin defenders and they are great
the only time I'd get AT tires are if I Lived somewhere very hot and offroaded a lot
Everybody has different needs and I Hike and Hunt and Fish too much too not have AT. One has to find what works for You TC.
this old thread always haunts me. guys with way more experience off road, telling me how good the LTX is...but it hurts to believe it.
very happy with my General Grabber ATs in SL load for trail work in the appalachians, but these Michelins are always in the back of my head.
Perfect off-highway tire = LTX? What? | Expedition Portal
AT tires you pay a 'cool' tax - in premium prices, vibration, noise and gas money + wet braking is poor. I don't like paying taxes.
defenders are the cost per mile champion
the king of sipes, full depth sipes
the million mile rubber
they aren't for the gram they are for the wallet
people driving with AT tires sound like a swarm of bees driving down the road. now I like honey, but not in my truck