J-BlickPhoto Thread

[J-BlickPhoto]

Is that the OEM front skid plate?!

Ya, it's been beat to pieces!

 

[DannyLlama]

Ya, it's been beat to pieces!

That is ballsy!

 

[J-BlickPhoto]

That is ballsy!

I feel like I see more people replacing a perfect stock skid plate without even testing or seeing how durable it is. It makes no sense to me?!?! How do you even know the one you're replacing it with is stronger or more durable?

 

[LawnDart]

I feel like I see more people replacing a perfect stock skid plate without even testing or seeing how durable it is. It makes no sense to me?!?! How do you even know the one you're replacing it with is stronger or more durable?

Jake, hit me up, I actually acquired a used but in great shape TRD plate, if you want it on deep discount let me know.

 

[DannyLlama]

I feel like I see more people replacing a perfect stock skid plate without even testing or seeing how durable it is. It makes no sense to me?!?! How do you even know the one you're replacing it with is stronger or more durable?

It's more like insurance to me. I would rather NOT take my chances i guess.

Jake, hit me up, I actually acquired a used but in great shape TRD plate, if you want it on deep discount let me know.

Do tell.. I'm curious.

 

[LawnDart]

It's more like insurance to me. I would rather NOT take my chances i guess.




Do tell.. I'm curious.

I pulled some parts off a friend's 4Runner that got into a fender bender, frame got bent, so we stripped some parts off before insurance wrote it off as a total loss. I only got a few things that wouldn't be missed. But if someone needs a steering wheel (TEP black controls), or skid plate hit me up. Otherwise it sits in my storage locker.

 

[J-BlickPhoto]

Spent a few nights camping out of the 4Runner. It's the only way I know how to spend Thanksgiving! :tea:

We finally had some solid weather for a few days. There's nothing like waking up to a high of 9 degrees!

We did some exploring east of Salida. We drove for over 4 hours off road and didn't see a single person!

 

[J-BlickPhoto]

:whoo:

 

[J-BlickPhoto]

:smow:

 

[desertred]

Where is that lake in the 3rd picture in post #927? I what to guess Twin Lakes, but I'm not so sure? The other water shots - Eleven Mile Lake?

 

[Arttieboy]

Got one for you bro. Mott lake Raeford Nc.

 

[J-BlickPhoto]

Where is that lake in the 3rd picture in post #927? I what to guess Twin Lakes, but I'm not so sure? The other water shots - Eleven Mile Lake?

Yep, that's Twin Lakes. The other is Clinton Gulch Res.

 

[4Running303]

Hey [MENTION=93894]J-BlickPhoto[/MENTION]...quick question, not trying to hijack...but I thought I read somewhere you were shooting with a Sony a7...which one are you using? I'm looking at picking up an a7R. How do you like the a7? I basically want the ability to shoot 4k underwater...we use Nikon D800's and D3's (6 of them!) at work for both topside and underwater shoots. I've got my bosses nearly convinced I need an a7r (maybe a II) for 4k video options.

Thanks for whatever advice you have. Great work as usual!

 

[J-BlickPhoto]

Hey [MENTION=93894]J-BlickPhoto[/MENTION]...quick question, not trying to hijack...but I thought I read somewhere you were shooting with a Sony a7...which one are you using? I'm looking at picking up an a7R. How do you like the a7? I basically want the ability to shoot 4k underwater...we use Nikon D800's and D3's (6 of them!) at work for both topside and underwater shoots. I've got my bosses nearly convinced I need an a7r (maybe a II) for 4k video options.

Thanks for whatever advice you have. Great work as usual!

I've had two A7's and an R for a short period and I like them a lot when paired with the correct lens. Sony pushes you to use an adapter which allows you to run the canon lenses, however it can be counterintuitive since it makes the camera bulky and heavy. I've never used the sony for underwater stuff, however I have for EVERYTHING else and it's been ok so far. I still like my Canon bodies and I prefer the button setup. With that being said, the Sonys can be configured to manipulate similar to a canons setup. When it comes to 4k, I rarely shoot in that format...I guess what I'm trying to say is that I don't need to. Processing speeds slow way down for me and since I'm the only guy at MAGPUL, time is precious. I will tell you that my R could basically see in the dark, however, as you know each camera processes noise differently...some better than others...when it came to higher ISO situations, I always turned to my canon.

I do know that the II is built more like a DSLR. It feels a little meatier but in a good way. OH...and the battery life of the Sony is TERRIBLE! TERRIBLE! I ended up buying 10 batteries for longer trips, and if it was going to be cold, I left it at home. A few months back I went out to WA for a shoot in the backcountry. I noticed around 30 degrees, the Sony batteries would last around 15 min of continuous shooting (video and stills). Anything less that 20 degrees...battery life would start around 40% and be exhausted within minutes. It also doesn't do well with dust and debris. I've had the buttons stop working while in a dusty location, but nothing compressed air couldn't solve. Just something to think about.

I don't know what type of underwater shoots you're doing, but I wouldn't stick a Sony in a housing. The buttons configuration would be far to annoying for me!

I hope this helps. I'm a canon guy myself...big bodies and heavy lenses! I like the Sony, but it definitely has its drawbacks...lens selection, battery life, button configuration, build quality. But I still own one because it's fun to shoot and useful in the right situations.

 

[LawnDart]

I've had two A7's and an R for a short period and I like them a lot when paired with the correct lens. Sony pushes you to use an adapter which allows you to run the canon lenses, however it can be counterintuitive since it makes the camera bulky and heavy. I've never used the sony for underwater stuff, however I have for EVERYTHING else and it's been ok so far. I still like my Canon bodies and I prefer the button setup. With that being said, the Sonys can be configured to manipulate similar to a canons setup. When it comes to 4k, I rarely shoot in that format...I guess what I'm trying to say is that I don't need to. Processing speeds slow way down for me and since I'm the only guy at MAGPUL, time is precious. I will tell you that my R could basically see in the dark, however, as you know each camera processes noise differently...some better than others...when it came to higher ISO situations, I always turned to my canon.

I do know that the II is built more like a DSLR. It feels a little meatier but in a good way. OH...and the battery life of the Sony is TERRIBLE! TERRIBLE! I ended up buying 10 batteries for longer trips, and if it was going to be cold, I left it at home. A few months back I went out to WA for a shoot in the backcountry. I noticed around 30 degrees, the Sony batteries would last around 15 min of continuous shooting (video and stills). Anything less that 20 degrees...battery life would start around 40% and be exhausted within minutes. It also doesn't do well with dust and debris. I've had the buttons stop working while in a dusty location, but nothing compressed air couldn't solve. Just something to think about.

I don't know what type of underwater shoots you're doing, but I wouldn't stick a Sony in a housing. The buttons configuration would be far to annoying for me!

I hope this helps. I'm a canon guy myself...big bodies and heavy lenses! I like the Sony, but it definitely has its drawbacks...lens selection, battery life, button configuration, build quality. But I still own one because it's fun to shoot and useful in the right situations.

The electronic VF, aka the EVF, is what kills the mirror less cameras for me. It's also the same issue we have on cinema cameras. Only one camera for filmmaking is still made with an optical viewfinder. It makes me sad.

 

[4Running303]

I've had two A7's and an R for a short period and I like them a lot when paired with the correct lens. Sony pushes you to use an adapter which allows you to run the canon lenses, however it can be counterintuitive since it makes the camera bulky and heavy. I've never used the sony for underwater stuff, however I have for EVERYTHING else and it's been ok so far. I still like my Canon bodies and I prefer the button setup. With that being said, the Sonys can be configured to manipulate similar to a canons setup. When it comes to 4k, I rarely shoot in that format...I guess what I'm trying to say is that I don't need to. Processing speeds slow way down for me and since I'm the only guy at MAGPUL, time is precious. I will tell you that my R could basically see in the dark, however, as you know each camera processes noise differently...some better than others...when it came to higher ISO situations, I always turned to my canon.

I do know that the II is built more like a DSLR. It feels a little meatier but in a good way. OH...and the battery life of the Sony is TERRIBLE! TERRIBLE! I ended up buying 10 batteries for longer trips, and if it was going to be cold, I left it at home. A few months back I went out to WA for a shoot in the backcountry. I noticed around 30 degrees, the Sony batteries would last around 15 min of continuous shooting (video and stills). Anything less that 20 degrees...battery life would start around 40% and be exhausted within minutes. It also doesn't do well with dust and debris. I've had the buttons stop working while in a dusty location, but nothing compressed air couldn't solve. Just something to think about.

I don't know what type of underwater shoots you're doing, but I wouldn't stick a Sony in a housing. The buttons configuration would be far to annoying for me!

I hope this helps. I'm a canon guy myself...big bodies and heavy lenses! I like the Sony, but it definitely has its drawbacks...lens selection, battery life, button configuration, build quality. But I still own one because it's fun to shoot and useful in the right situations.

Thank you for the info! I work for the National Park Service...I work underwater for the NPS, so the shoots range from fresh to saltwater, reefs, shipwrecks, more shipwrecks, and occasionally sea life (i'm an underwater archaeologist, so fish are just bio-clutter to me). A7r II's 4K ability is what we're looking for, while still being useful as a still. We have Red's as well for 4K, but it'd be nice to have something ultra-portable (like the a7r II's) for 4K.

Anyways, your first hand experience is much appreciated! I did not know that about the battery life...being cold and underwater in Lake Superior could definitely be a problem on a deep dive and losing that much battery life to the cold. Something we will definitely have to consider.

 

[J-BlickPhoto]

Nothing better than getting back from one trip, turning around and going out again! :roll:

OH...and the last pic was a terrible idea! :nono:

 

[J-BlickPhoto]

Killed it in the Backcountry this morning for 4 hours. Definitely happy to be back at the truck! :cheer2:

 

[mnofpeace]

if this were the 70s, you'd get my vote for the Marlboro Man

minus the lung cancer of course

 

[ST1FLER]

Jake, how many miles do you have on your 4R now.... always on the move