Lexus IS-F vs. Audi RS4

Thai

Elite Member
Edmunds Comparo: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/d...=123158?tid=edmunds.il.home.photopanel..1.*#2

"The 3,780-pound IS-F gets to 60 mph in 4.8 seconds and does the quarter-mile in 13.2 seconds at 109 mph, trailing the RS4 to 60 mph by about a half-second and to the quarter-mile by almost as much. This is with the stability and traction control systems off (yes, Lexus actually allows such a thing, a policy initiated for its performance cars for 2007) and the transmission in Drive. Later we made our runs and manually shifted the IS-F's transmission, which feels fast but predictably isn't, especially since the launch is better in Drive.

Not that it matters. For all its displacement, technology and furious bark, the Lexus 5.0-liter doesn't make the IS-F much quicker than a BMW 335i, which makes 116 hp less.

Front spring and damper rates are up a whopping 90 percent compared to the standard IS, and the rear rates are 50 percent firmer. This is a stiff car
 
Register to hide this ad
Yes,mid 12s is at least where that car should be for the $$$. To be fair the Audi is AWD and that makes up for HP deficits.

My Eclipse was quicker in the 1/4 than the last gen Vipers which were putting out 450hp and my AWD Eclipse was laying down maybe 360 at the crank but my traction off the line got me across the finish line just as the Viper was bearing down;it was the 6 car lead at the 1/8th mile mark that won it for me.
 
RS4 vs. M3 vs. C63: http://www.caranddriver.com/compari...-benz-c63-amg-v-07-audi-rs-4-v-08-bmw-m3.html

Wow, the C63 went from 0-60 in 3.9 seconds!! The M3 won due to it having the best balance and handling...and getting 4.3 seconds from 0-60. This does not look good for the IS-F...BMW and MB seem to have cornered the market...BMW for those who value handling...MB for those who want brute force. I guess the Lexus will be for those who want power and reliability.
 
Koz said:
That's funny, Automobile mag has the IS-F quicker then the RS-4 and the M3. The C63-AMG is the quickest (2 tenths quicker then the IS-F to 60mph) with its 6.1L.

http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/lexus/0710_2008_lexus_is-f/photo_11.html

Koz

Koz, you're right...your post is quite funny! That Automobile review (more like a preview) is using MANUFACTURER'S figures...those numbers are NOT actual test results. The above posts by me are from ACTUAL test results.

Actual numbers so far...IS-F is around 4.8 s, M3 is around 4.4 s, and C63 is just very fast! M3 is the best handler of the bunch. C63 is the muscle car of the bunch. IS-F is probably the reliable one of the bunch.
 
Car & Driver

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.2 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.8 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 24.7 sec
Street start, 5
 
Thai said:
RS4 vs. M3 vs. C63: http://www.caranddriver.com/compari...-benz-c63-amg-v-07-audi-rs-4-v-08-bmw-m3.html

Wow, the C63 went from 0-60 in 3.9 seconds!! The M3 won due to it having the best balance and handling...and getting 4.3 seconds from 0-60. This does not look good for the IS-F...BMW and MB seem to have cornered the market...BMW for those who value handling...MB for those who want brute force. I guess the Lexus will be for those who want power and reliability.

to quote that article, the winner of this comparo will go up next against the IS-F and the CTS-V. It looks like a good battle between second and third, given C&D's BMW bias.


One thing about C&D acceleration times, they do things that the normal driver could (or would) not want to do to their vehicle. They pound the hell out of the car to find the ideal launch technique in an effort to shave a few tenths off the time. On more than one occasion, they have returned a car to the manufacturer with a smoked clutch. That said, I feel the number is not final until I see what C&D has posted!
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,315
Messages
3,554,102
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top