Why anyone buys a cheaply made critical part with multiple failures associated with them boggles my mind.
Chinese POS.
To be fair, the quality did improve from '12 to '14 when I looked over the old ones vs. the new ones I installed. A major factor in why I chose these UCA was because they offered the most adjustability compared to most other brands for the price point and I didn't feel like dealing with the pitting/corrosion, contamination, and noise issues that go along with most uniball UCA at the time.
All that being said, I will most likely be ditching the SPC arms for a uniball set-up (either a higher end unit, or something I'll design and make later down the road.) The ability to easily and consistently set your camber and caster with such a forgiving variance is a good design feature of the arms. While I am aware of the quality issues that have been brought up about these arms in the past (and like I said, it's not the first one I have seen in person of the older units), the company has done right by me and took care of me when I did have an issue that was their fault and they corrected it in a timely and satisfactory manner. Other than the bushing issue I had with my older arms, the new ones have held up to some serious abuse on my part that hasn't resulted in any signs of failure (I do check mine regularly.)
So I can't exactly say the particular set of SPC LR UCA on my vehicle are "crap" as they have held alignment where I set it, the bushings have and are holding up, the arms have been structurally sound, and when I did have an issue the company took care of me as I expect any company to take care of their customer with good service. But there
IS/WAS a large variance in their level of quality control and t
hat is something to be concerned about and something to make potential buyers aware of, so that they are informed about the product.
Like I said in many posts every time this issue comes up, the company has earned a reputation for making a mostly uncertain product when it comes to quality/reliability. But they have and seem to be currently attempting to change/rectify that and improve their business practices/quality control. While it's easy to just sit back and lambaste them for being the worst company in the world, it's not entirely fair to discount that they have made efforts to improve their product. I'm not saying they get a free pass, just to be open minded that maybe in 2016 they release a "perfect" version of the UCA with consistent quality control, but everyone is so deadset on punishing them for their prior failings they refuse to acknowledge they have made an effort. This forum like much of the human race is quick to reinforce confirmation bias and use it as justified fact (keep in mind that there are plenty of members who have these arms and do use and abuse their rigs more than most people on this forum and they haven't had issues with the product, so that's still part of the equation.) They earned their reputation and they need to work hard to change that perception of themselves and their product, no argument there; but not even giving them the decency to prove themselves is a disservice to everyone involved.
Just to be clear, I'm not defending SPC/LR's product. But rather trying to be the Devil's Advocate here and point out that people are quick to jump on their elitist/bias train and bash others without giving themselves or the people their bashing a fair assessment. (I mean it's not like SPC/LR is Gobi here, they actually have been making an effort to improve their product and care about their customers.)