Looking for old LBJ

Everything looks pretty good. Good job!

Are you going to thoroughly test these before you sell them?

Once people see the price of these they may shy away.

I will be doing road testing as well as destructive testing. I dont have a price yet but when I do, if people are turned off by the price then I guess it wasnt meant for them then. Things like this arent cheap, so if anyone thinks the price will be comparable to a OEM ball joint then they have never done anything like this before and dont understand the time and effort that goes into this kind of stuff. I am doing anything and everything to make this as affordable as possible, but ive put hours and hours into this and I dont really plan on working for free.

This is an interesting thread and I'd like to chime in and formally apologize for the Hi-jack, the work here is awesome and look forward to see more!
I like the idea of changing the design of the lower ball joint to something different.
Everyone can argue that the OE style is junk and aftermarket are even worse, I should know, at 229K I have already gone through at least 3 sets.

However and exposed uni ball joint might not be the greatest solution.
Just hear me out on this.

First set of LBJ's were replaced at 160K (120k w/no lift, 40K w/lift) and the failure was abnormal to what everyone else usually experiences, the cap on the joint actually came off and the joint pushed itself into the CV.
From there I have used aftermarket replacements, the second set lasting till around 40K, the 3rd set again aftermarket brought me another 20k before getting play in them, now on my 4th aftermarket set with no issues, but looking to go OEM.

Not done though, after my first initial lift I went from standard upper control arms to Uni-ball upper control arms. Living in the north east, and in the rust belt makes this a fun purchase, in that I find that I change out upper joints at least every 20K, I am already on my 3rd set of uniballs, while I did get the arms used, I was told that they had 30k on them and they just started to get play, then after that it seemed to follow a 20k interval.

Now considering that the upper ball joint is not a load bearing joint, this kinda sucks but its the environment, not change the position and add load, I would look to most likely cut that track record in 1/2, thats changing out joints a lot, an at $54 a unit w/o shipping that is a lot of $$$ I just would like to use else where.

Now going back to the ball joints, I understand it is not the best design, but if they are OEM, they still last quiet a good bit, on a stock rig can last well over 100k.
However, I feel they should be a normal maintenance item like many other items on the 3rd gen.

I feel if you stick with OEM joints and your stock, you should go ahead and replace the lower joints every 100k weather they are good or not, and if you have just lifted I would replace them while doing your lift and then proceed with an interval of every 75k.

As far as the lower ball joint being a limiting factor:


I haven't had a problem yet with stuffing that tire into the wheel well.
With just adding the OEM Ball joint at a routine maintenance a certain mileage interval you avoid having to deal with a failure.
Think of it as doing your plugs every 30K miles, they have a wear limit, and while if you exceed that mileage you don't instantly throw a misfire it is inevitable.

Again sorry for the hi-jack and keep up the good work, I look forward to see the progress and test results of the joints!

Its all good man. I am definitely open to all feedback. Anything that can help me form the best product is valuable.

The main difference I would say in the failure aspect is that when the ball joint fails it leaves you stranded whether that is on the trail or in the driveway. One of the core reasons that I decided to go down this road is that I believe the uniball will never fail like this. A uniball needs maintenance just like a ball joint would. Cleaning and dry film can go a long ways. I have seen uniballs last roughly 10k-15k on a class 5 car. Now thats racing in snore, score, bitd.. etc. Also using a good quality uniball makes a difference as well. To be completely honest I dont know how long these will last, the only way I will now is to put em on and give it a go. I dont want people to be fooled into thinking I am claiming these will last forever, but I do believe it will be comparable.

I am working on a way to keep the uniball from the elements. Being in southern California I dont have to worry about the salt, snow and mud that other parts of the country deal with but I am working on it. I hear everyone's concern and am toying with many different ideas.

Added travel was never my end game. Disconnecting the sway bars gives enough travel to get through most anything. These 4Runners are very capable vehicles, strength and not getting stranded are my end game.

If you feel the OEM ball joint is your best bet then stick with it. I am not forcing these upon anyone, and haven't even said I am going to sell them for sure. I am just fixing what I think to be a weak spot in the suspension, I am not providing a fix to maintenance. These will need to be maintained just the same.
 
Good point about the steering reduction, I hadn't thought about that. That does kind of defeat any strength benefit of running the uniball laterally.

As far as the 3rd vs 4th gen LBJ's, it really isn't a manufacturing benefit, it is a HUGE safety improvement. Look at the 3rd vs 4th gen LBJ's and imagine that the ball and cup of each was severely worn to the point that the ball can slip out of the cup. Now look at the loading from the spring, which forces the LCA down. On the 3rd gen, the downward force on the LCA will force the ball right out of the cup, and the whole wheel and spindle basically falls off the vehicle. On the 4th gen, the downward force keeps the cup clamped down over the ball, so you don't get separation, just looseness in steering.

I bet you anything that this was discussed by Toyota and some higher strength steel alloy was used in the LBJ's to improve strength to overcome the poor design. Then for 4th gen they fixed the design. I'm not sure why the 2nd gen's don't seem to fail as much as they are a similar loading configuration, but this just stinks of an "oh $&!%" moment at Toyota.

This is also why we say only use OEM LBJ's, it seems you really need the high strength steel alloy to not fail within the 60-90k life of the LBJ.

Old response but the reason why the 1st and 2nd gen runners don't have lower ball joint issues is because torsion bar. Torsion bar is attracted to the UCA. There isn't anything pushing the LCA down like a strut found in 3rd gen.

Toyota did reverse the design on the 4th gen and up. This created a fail safe and gave the LCA more ground clearance. Replace the BJ in the 4th gen and up isn't that much harder. Matter of undoing bj to spindle and than LCA from vehicle.

To OP. Hope you figure it out. I wonder if they will work for 1st gen tundras as well????
 
A uniball needs maintenance just like a ball joint would. Cleaning and dry film can go a long ways. I have seen uniballs last roughly 10k-15k on a class 5 car.

Exactly. Proper maintenance goes a long way. Chances are those uni-balls weren't maintained at all. I'm in Missouri (not as much snow), and have been running Icon UCA's on my F150 for about 30k or 2 years with no issues. I clean mine after every snow, and oil them with Tri-Flow Uni-Ball Lube. In all they get cleaned about 3-4 times a year.
 
Last edited:
So from a guy that lives in Canada, and snows heavily for 6 months of the year, are these a good alternative to the OEM ball joint? Looking to replace the front end components, this spring, it would be pretty sweet to try this out! :canada:
 
So from a guy that lives in Canada, and snows heavily for 6 months of the year, are these a good alternative to the OEM ball joint? Looking to replace the front end components, this spring, it would be pretty sweet to try this out! :canada:

I am working on a way to keep the salt from the top of the uniball. Thats where it will stick and prematurely wear the uniball. Like it was said in previous posts leaning and lubricating go a long way. Hopefully I can come up with a way the will keep the elements out.
 
I am working on a way to keep the salt from the top of the uniball. Thats where it will stick and prematurely wear the uniball. Like it was said in previous posts leaning and lubricating go a long way. Hopefully I can come up with a way the will keep the elements out.

Maybe some kind of cap? or rubber boot?
 
Beautiful work! It's exciting to see someone take a part like this and change it up! Can't wait to see the final product and hear how testing goes!
 
Maybe some kind of cap? or rubber boot?
I am working on an aluminum cover that would silicon into place or bolt to the bottom of the spindle. Still a lot of ideas to filter through but once I get the piece into place I am hoping that the best idea will present itself.

Beautiful work! It's exciting to see someone take a part like this and change it up! Can't wait to see the final product and hear how testing goes!
Thanks man, I am hoping to have my set done this weekend. One step closer to making this available for the public :bigok:
 
you probably need to add a bit of material onto the top of the uniball cup so that you can fit a thin o ring into it. then the cap will snap in and use the o ring to form a seal.
 
you probably need to add a bit of material onto the top of the uniball cup so that you can fit a thin o ring into it. then the cap will snap in and use the o ring to form a seal.

Clearance is the issue. The top of the uniball cup has to be flat to mate to the bottom of the spindle. I am still brainstorming ideas. At this point I need to install the piece and see what I am dealing with.
 
Ill just leave this here...



Ended up using 17-4 stainless with certification for the spacers, about the strongest you can buy. Unfortunately a knee injury has been slowing me down on getting any real work done at the shop. I will be revising my design to simplify and strengthen the spacers and then do another one for a time study to see what the final price will be for these.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,309
Messages
3,554,068
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top