I want to ask a question about your course. I think a little background about myself will help see I have pretty valid credentials to ask this.
I have been a firefighter, EMT. I have a NY State AMGA accredited Climbing Guides license. I have been involved in high angle rescues both as a firefighter and as a climber. I have taught high angle rescue techniques.
I'm all for people being prepared for the worse. I think doing so allows you to operate with less stress when the shit really hits the fan. I'm all for teaching people to make smart informed decisions in critical situations.
Your course seems a little short to prepare folks. A standard WFR(Wilderness First Responder) course is 9-10 days. They run from 600-1000 and are available all over the country. That course I recommend to anyone that spends time pursuing outdoor passions. So, what do you teach people in 6 hours that they will retain and can then be used in critical situations?
Again, I have a lot of respect for this idea I just want to here your thoughts.
That's a totally valid question, theesotericone. Keep in mind that these courses are designed for either 1:the professional who wants a quick refresher as well as awareness of any new developments in the field (we've had former PJs and similar come through just to keep skills up), or 2: the civilian who has had zero or very little training in these areas.
I think it's unrealistic to expect the average civilian to attend a multi-day (and often thousand-dollar plus) course which is often aimed at credentialing at some level. Take TCCC, for example, of which I am also an instructor. A 16 hour course which delves into ALS medications, cricothyrotomy procedures, and nine-line evacuation orders, among other things, in addition to basic techniques of hemorrhage control: a lot of that information is going to be extraneous to someone who is responding at the layperson level. On the other hand, take Stop the Bleed (of which I am also an instructor and coordinator)-- a 2 hour course in the most basic techniques of tourniquet application and junctional wound packing. While a class like this is valuable toward building community awareness and instilling an initial working knowledge of bleeding control, it fall far short of addressing other types of traumatic injuries, Tx for shock, airway complications, or providing any scenario-based training to build muscle memory and systematic modes of assessment and treatment: all things that I would argue that I can accomplish in a 6 hour class. Note that the classes used to be 8 hours, but people were exhausted by the end, so I removed a few of the less-used skills and shortened it to accomodate attention span. And all of what I'm saying here is only addressing the our trauma-specific course, Trauma 101. That course is then followed by opportunities for the student to come back and participate in scenario training every other month, because we all know that skill decay is a real thing (a recent research paper found that a person could be taught to use a TQ in less than 30 minutes, but without practice would forget TQ application techniques 70% of the time when tested 6 months later).
Longish answer to your question, for which I apologize if unwarranted, but I get geeky about med training and practice. Would it be adviseable for every person to attend a Wilderness Responder course (and I would point out that there exist numerous such courses that are only 2 or 3 days in duration)? Of course it would be, but that's not going to happen for most people. Therefore, it makes sense to me to offer training that is accessible, not unreasonable in terms of commitment, and yet equips community members to be more useful when situations arise.
I could keep going on like this for hours, but that would seem masturbatory on my part, so I'll stop there. I genuinely appreciate you asking the question: if you feel that my answer isn't sufficient, or you'd like to discuss further, please don't hesitate to hit me up.