**Photography Talk**

[MENTION=103641]Jdog[/MENTION]

as answered above...its both. you def need a good quality lens and body that can handle digital noise (high ISO) and the right settings. for milk way shots or any astro shots, its all dependent on what you're going for. remember, stars are moving (or is it the earth?) so the longer your shutter is open the less crisp they will be and more of a trail. I've found (read) that for milk way 15-20" exposure is about the max you want to go..which means higher ISO and more noise so that's where a great lens/body come in to play. doesn't mean you cant do it with a kit lens but it may not look as good as someone with a high end lens. with night theres no DOF (generally) so shoot wide open (the lowest f/ number you have) since its dark you will need to manually focus, most situations you can just set your focus point to the infinity symbol then dial back a hair (usually theres a line to set it to). get a great sturdy tripod. if you have IS or VR (canon vs Nikon) turn it off since it will shake the camera. start out at high ISO taking some test shots...and adjust accordingly. these are all basic rules and of course adjust in some scenarios

what I did for night shots when I first started learning (and im sure its not the right way) I set up my camera. start at a high ISO, say 2000, f/4 or wider, 30". and keep dialing back ISO until it looks right (meaning not too bright/over blown). after awhile you get so good at it and know your camera so well that you can almost get it right in the first shot.

heres some of my examples (im sure I've posted these earlier)
f/4 30secs ISO 500 in complete darkness

10653164816_6288f39ab0_c.jpg


with shots like this. the moon is moving so you cant go 30" unless you want it a blur. another place where you gotta experiment when learning. you have to adjust the ISO for a faster shutter

f/4 1sec ISO 400 with city lights

14441497543_748e96d3c8_c.jpg


great thing about digital, you can shoot away and delete. practice. practice. practice.

and [MENTION=56396]Hepar[/MENTION] ill see your hawks tomorrow....and again in September when im in Seattle....GO BRONCOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :dance:
 
and [MENTION=56396]Hepar[/MENTION] ill see your hawks tomorrow....and again in September when im in Seattle....GO BRONCOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :dance:

You bet! I think the game in Sept will be a big one for you guys. Come in and win or at least be competitive and that will do well for confidence. Come in and get blown out and that would be a pretty big mental blow for any potential rematch down the road.

The Clink will be rocking!

(posted before but no harm in reminding everyone!)

<iframe src="https://www.flickr.com/photos/jkusuiphotography/12348344173/player/" width="1024" height="683" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen></iframe>
 
f/4 1sec ISO 400 with city lights

14441497543_748e96d3c8_c.jpg

I think shooting city lights, especially if you have things like lamps and such, are better at a smaller (larger number) f-stop. It will reduce the amount of blown out light around them which to me, adds to the shot. But that's also a preference on how you want the end result to look.

That's a killer shot for the record.
 
That is super helpful man thanks. So far all have gotten in the line of good astro photography is the moon one above with my 250mm kit lens. But I will definitely use that information. thanks.
And those are super cool photos.
 
[MENTION=56396]Hepar[/MENTION] agree on both the game and shot

I chose to shoot wide cause I wanted a faster shutter speed for the moon. otherwise I tend to shoot in the f/16-18 range to get the starbursts in the lights.

ive been a Broncos fan for 30yrs, but I used to live in Seattle so ive been to many many.....many seahawk games. when they played at the kingdome, UW stadium and I was a season ticket holder the first 3 seasons 'seahawks stadium' opened. ive always hated the seahawks. im just an overall football fan though so I go to as many games as possible.
 
[MENTION=56396]
ive been a Broncos fan for 30yrs, but I used to live in Seattle so ive been to many many.....many seahawk games. when they played at the kingdome, UW stadium and I was a season ticket holder the first 3 seasons 'seahawks stadium' opened. ive always hated the seahawks. im just an overall football fan though so I go to as many games as possible.

I do like that they're both considered favorites to return to the Super Bowl. I grew up here my whole life. Parents had season tickets since the beginning. Miss the old AFC West rivalries.
 
Not a true photography question but one that photographers/videographers might know the answer to.

Any of you use a drobo? What are your thoughts?

http://amzn.to/XHBren

If so do you know how to partition on Mac 10.8 to use time-machine?
 
what about this device? it looks like a nice alternative. has the SD card reader and i can transfer to a USB Thumb drive. USB drives are cheap and small. plus its portable and will also charge my devices.
RAVPower


follow up:
I ended up ordering this RAV Power device and it works as advertised. its a nice alternative to the more expensive options. I tested it last night, plugging in my SD card (with CR2.raw files), and a USB flash drive in to both slots. then using their app I copied all of the files from the SD to the USB. being CR2 files theres no preview but that's ok with me. while traveling this is great for backing up files on to the drives.
if so inclined I also have option to save to 'local' then using the app I can find the CR2 file in my photos>open with snapseed (iPhoto and other apps will work too im sure) to view/edit/be an instagram whore.

another benefit to this device...wifi. my iPad is only 16gb which only allows for 6-7 mp4's. with this I can load movies on to a USB drive, plug in to the device, and watch wirelessly on my iPad allowing me to take more movies with me on my travels. its quick too, you can ffwd easily with no lag time. you can manage the movies too from the app, ifyou watched it and want to make room on the drive, just delete it.

and yet another benefit....it charges your devices via USB.

all in all a pretty slick device for $45.
 
My wife and I dropped some saved up cash today for our trip tomorrow.
This is a list of what we got-chime in if you think we missed anything.
Nikon D5200 body with 18-55 3.5-5.6 lens
55-200 f4-5.6 extra lens
16 gig SD (speed 8 for downloading and hd video.)
Polarized lens
Spare battery
Backpack to carry everything

What we want after we recoup some money.
Tripod
Whatever else you guys recommend.

e4ejevab.jpg
 
Very nice!

I don't know what kind of tripod you have looked at, but if you want to make your footprint tiny I would recommend this:

MeFOTO BackPacker Travel Tripod (Black) A0350Q0K B&H Photo Video

I have my main tripod but this one is absolutely tiny. It would be great if you didn't need something that gets really tall.


Yank ~. Sorry dude not feeling like dropping $130 on a tripod right now. Thinking the $15 one from walmart will work for now or my vid camera one. All good.
 
I've used Photoshop, Aperature, and Lightroom. IMO Lightroom is the cats ass. You just need to get your folders and everything setup and become familiar with the tools. It's an incredible program. I have created a few of my own "presets" so it makes editing the average photo a breeze. Click on my baseline preset and adjust exposure/white balance etc from there. Even for major editing projects, there are a tonne of tools to help. Layer masking is always cool!

Forgot to ask this question....whos using Lightroom 4, and whos using 5? Is it worth it to spring for 5 over 4?

Downtown Calgary:

20130730-IMG_3245.jpg by RickaShay24, on Flickr

Calgary is such an AMAZING city...I really wish I could have spent more time there. I need to make another trip up there, this time I will bring my camera to the Flames game though.
 
Last edited:
Whatever else you guys recommend.

I always recommend anyone using a Nikon DX body to pick up the Nikkor 35mm f1.8. It's a ridiculously sharp lens for the money and the f1.8 is super handy for a variety of conditions. It's essentially the nifty fifty of the DX world.

Very nice!

I don't know what kind of tripod you have looked at, but if you want to make your footprint tiny I would recommend this:

MeFOTO BackPacker Travel Tripod (Black) A0350Q0K B&H Photo Video

I have my main tripod but this one is absolutely tiny. It would be great if you didn't need something that gets really tall.

Thanks, I'm going to check this out. I've actually been looking for a smaller tripod.

Forgot to ask this question....whos using Lightroom 4, and whos using 5? Is it worth it to spring for 5 over 4?

I use 5 over 4, but haven't noticed anything huge to make me say that you definitely need to make the switch. But editing is also not my strong suit, so I might be overlooking something.



Calgary is such an AMAZING city...I really wish I could have spent more time there. I need to make another trip up there, this time I will bring my camera to the Flames game though.

One day I'll see a game in the Saddle Dome...
 
Yank ~. Sorry dude not feeling like dropping $130 on a tripod right now. Thinking the $15 one from walmart will work for now or my vid camera one. All good.

with anything in life you get what you pay for. i started with a cheapo tripod and it was very frustrating to use. not stable, broke easily. better to spend the extra and get a good quality one.
you can get good decent ones in the $70 range
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,310
Messages
3,554,079
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top