**Photography Talk**

how are the long exposures not blown out??

Small apertures and you can also stack photos.




Been shamefully a while since I've actually taken some photos. Been stuck behind the computer doing mostly editing work lately.

Here's some from the most recent surf trip I went on.

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jkusuiphotography/10503858223/" title="DSC_3230 by JKUsui Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2859/10503858223_0f66a9d944_b.jpg" width="1024" height="579" alt="DSC_3230"></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jkusuiphotography/10503796843/" title="DSC_3285 by JKUsui Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3759/10503796843_c325f84153_b.jpg" width="1024" height="524" alt="DSC_3285"></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jkusuiphotography/10503617804/" title="DSC_3495 by JKUsui Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7316/10503617804_eddfd47d29_b.jpg" width="1024" height="683" alt="DSC_3495"></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jkusuiphotography/10503810513/" title="DSC_3570 by JKUsui Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2890/10503810513_ddc4dc0e01_b.jpg" width="1024" height="683" alt="DSC_3570"></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jkusuiphotography/10503603395/" title="DSC_3452 by JKUsui Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3678/10503603395_ea6296feb3_b.jpg" width="1024" height="683" alt="DSC_3452"></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jkusuiphotography/10503602085/" title="DSC_3450 by JKUsui Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2819/10503602085_2aa2b18756_b.jpg" width="1024" height="684" alt="DSC_3450"></a>
 
Last edited:
couple recent pics ive taken

arrowhead golf course
HDR with -3,0,+3 ev at f/16
(i hate the sky in this)
10391851745_ff72ac317c_c.jpg

Hmm, never tried an HDR with that much separation in exposure. Usually I only separate by +/-1 EV. Do you do this often, or did it just lend better to this lighting/photo?
 
for which pics? long exp at night are hard to blow out unless you leave the shutter open too long (45secs+)
during the day you can use ND filters and do long exp w/o blowing them out

There are some lights in the night shots, wouldn't those blow them out? The ski lift photo in particular.
 
Hmm, never tried an HDR with that much separation in exposure. Usually I only separate by +/-1 EV. Do you do this often, or did it just lend better to this lighting/photo?

ive never tried only doing +/-1 before. always done 2-3 EV. and put together in photomatix. im not in to the cartoony ones so i leave must sliders alone

broncosi ive never had an issue. its far too dark out to really worry about that. if theres a lot of extra light pollution possibly but in that case you just change exp time down but at night 20-30secs you should be ok
 
went out last night and grabbed a couple pics


had an LED light inside the truck to light up the cab
f/4
ISO 500
30secs
Canon 6D
17-40F4L @17mm
10653164816_6288f39ab0_c.jpg


6th ave with downtown Denver and the RTD light rail bridge
f/14
ISO 100
30secs
Canon 6D
17-40F4L @ 40mm
10656215953_252d94ec5e_c.jpg
 
[MENTION=16474]leftyguns21[/MENTION] - Dig them! Especially like the first one.


I've been forgetting to add the info on the shots.

50mm f11 1/200th ISO 100

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jkusuiphotography/10566614714/" title="DSC_3753 by JKUsui Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5537/10566614714_1740ce4421_b.jpg" width="1024" height="698" alt="DSC_3753"></a>

50mm f11 1/100th ISO 100

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jkusuiphotography/10566576206/" title="DSC_3750 by JKUsui Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5544/10566576206_b52c820918_b.jpg" width="1024" height="610" alt="DSC_3750"></a>
 
Wanted to keep my posts separate.

To all the photographers out there, which photography magazine do you suggest to subscribe to?

I'd like to be in the know and get some good tips.

Popular photography?
 
To all the photographers out there, which photography magazine do you suggest to subscribe to?

None.

Teh intertubes is much MUCH better.

The photo magazines have devolved into pure advertising sheets (some ads are labeled as ads and some are labeled as reviews).
 
None.

Teh intertubes is much MUCH better.

The photo magazines have devolved into pure advertising sheets (some ads are labeled as ads and some are labeled as reviews).

Agreed. Some of them have decent articles once in a while, but most of them are distributed by the same publisher which means you see some of the same reviews/ads/articles in all of them.

I like Outdoor Photographer. AZ Highways is another that has great imagery and they throw photo tips in there too.
 
Absolutely love that picture!!! Great work man.. Is that a serious of shots or just one?

aw thank you.
its a single shot. well i took 3-4 that night but this one turned out the best. i had a few of it head-on but they didnt look as good.
its something new ive been wanting to try so ill def get out and try some more.
[MENTION=75328]DannyLlama[/MENTION] i agree with others, mags are filled with ads and very little helpful info. honestly i get the most info from podcasts in iTunes. i sub to lightroom, photoshop and photograpy podcasts.
 
Wanted to keep my posts separate.

To all the photographers out there, which photography magazine do you suggest to subscribe to?

I'd like to be in the know and get some good tips.

Popular photography?

None of the print ones are good. They are all just advertisements. Photolife and BW (think it's BW+Color now) were ok in the past.

I would recommend an online magazine from craft & vision called Photograph. No advertisements and great content. It's quarterly and pdf.

http://craftandvision.com/magazines/
 
Last edited:
I find the articles in Outdoor Photographer interesting. If you're into post processing checking out Photoshop User too.
 
while normal people work on a tuesday, this is what i do...


IMG_5207 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_5190 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_5178 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_5157 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_5148-2 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_5127 by isaacyocum, on Flickr
i hope i dont get banned for that pic...

IMG_5125 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_5116 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_5089 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_4983 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_4985 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_4987 by isaacyocum, on Flickr
this pic looks like its not level, but its just an optical illusion, the railing is coming back at you, as well as the shore line on the right hand side...

IMG_4992 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_4991 by isaacyocum, on Flickr

IMG_5029 by isaacyocum, on Flickr
apparently the water was not cold enough...

IMG_5044-2 by isaacyocum, on Flickr
 
Anyone on here NOT use a UV filter or have a protective filter of sme kind on their lenses at all times?

only if your a complete bumbling moron or have crapy lens, or have more money that you can shake a stick at... that little UV filter will save some spendy glass, ask me how i know
 
only if your a complete bumbling moron or have crapy lens, or have more money that you can shake a stick at... that little UV filter will save some spendy glass, ask me how i know

This was my point. Pictures forthcoming, but my GF dropped my camera and my polarized shattered but the lens is OK, thank God. I was so scared when I saw that... :eek:
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,310
Messages
3,554,078
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top