Planned Parenthood Shooting
- Thread starter ndcent
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Taco04
Member
You might want to add "After 9/11" because if you include 9/11 it will make your math skills look really dumb.....
wadle5
New member
Ha he might also want to add his source, considering the boston bombing negates this argument as the most recent/significant attack. This is just a dumb post to bump up his posts number. Dream big man
THE LIST:
– Nidal Hasan – Ft Hood Shooter: Reg*istered Democrat and Muslim.
– Aaron Alexis, Navy Yard shooter – black liberal/Obama voter
– Seung-Hui Cho – Virginia Tech shooter: Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff, registered Democrat.
– James Holmes – the “Dark Knight”/Colorado shooter: Registered Democrat, staff worker on the Obama campaign, #Occu*py guy,progressive liberal, hated Christians.
– Amy Bishop, the rabid leftist, killed her colleagues in Alabama, Obama supporter.
– Andrew J. Stack, flew plane into IRS building in Texas – Leftist Democrat
– James J. Lee who was the “green activist”/ leftist took hostages at Discovery Channel – progressive liberal Democrat.
As I stated . . this is an opinion posts and you are trying to pass it as fact. Standard misleading headline like most of the news today.
Good luck out there in the real world when your opinion is challenged with facts.
Last edited:
wadle5
New member
Parody or sarcasm? If you believe parody "an imitation of the style of a particular writer, artist, or genre "
who exactly were you imitating in particular?
For this I think it is sarcasm "the use of irony"
Cool thread bro. . . .
cdoubravsky
New member
sometimes i'm please with how far humanity has come over the years. then i still hear stories like this one and im not sure anymore
wadle5
New member
Although I think I deciphered what you were drying to say. What I find more terrifying is the fact that these people get to vote?!?!?!
jwkilgore
New member
The bold sentence is not true. A more accurate statement would be, "In the USA after 9/11, you're two times more likely to be killed by a right-wing domestic terrorist than a muslim terrorist." Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0
But this only includes killings that are classified as domestic terrorism, which must meet the following definition.
(B) is the kicker. As most of the crimes committed by liberals in wadle's list don't meet that requirement they aren't considered "domestic terrorism" and therefore aren't included in the NY Times article.
If you eliminate the "right wing" and "terrorism" requirements and include all mass shootings you will raise the ratio, but you still won't get near "7 times". Maybe if you include all killings of any kind?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_terrorism_in_the_United_States
Incidentally, just because someone who commits violence happens to belong to a particular group, it doesn't mean the group is associated with the violence. Even though Aaron Alexis happened to vote for a president with matching skin color, that doesn't' make him a "liberal extremist". Robert Dear, however, did specifically commit violence in the name of his group, so that does make him a "right wing extremist".
T4R2014
Elite Member
If you're trying to insult someone here, the best term to use would be "liberal", followed by a comparison to Obama.
ndcent
New member
One of the truest statements I've read here. Glad at least one person gets it.
T4R2014
Elite Member
It's few and far between in this forum.
T4R2014
Elite Member
ndcent
New member
Glad I'm not the only one who would throw her the D.
You would make a good politician, or "journalist". They are adept at taking partial snippets of comments, and repeating them out of context to suit their agenda.
Here's the full comment:
Here's your comment to another member, that prompted my comment:
