That 3.5L, and 6-speed Auto Trans that is going into the Taco is what we will be seeing in the 6th Gen. It doesn't make sense that Toyota would put anything else in there....I just hope they will release more details on the 2016 Taco before its release.
I'm not sure if I want full time 4WD on all the new 4Runners but the option to have it on the SR5s would be nice.
Why? The Limiteds have it, as well as all the land cruisers produced since the 80 series.
It's a bullet proof design.
Why? The Limiteds have it, as well as all the land cruisers produced since the 80 series.
It's a bullet proof design.
MPG. Same reason all the cross overs did away with full time awd. 30% less transfer case parasitic loss. Seems like the old 2wd, awd, 4wd offered everything. In a perfect world we'd have those options in a gear driven case.
Those wheels sorts look like the Tundra wheels.
Hey [MENTION=104049]marshal[/MENTION]. I had a rental SR5 in August out in California. Drove from LA-San Fran-Bug Sur-Vegas-LA totalling something like 1,600 miles. I definitely noticed much better highway mileage. I could easily get over 20mpg and sometimes I was at 21-22 despite doing 75-80mph the majority of the time. Lots of mountain passes out there too. Even in day-to-day light driving 18mpg was very achievable. With my LE I rarely see above 18mpg on the highway and I'm not usually much better than 17-18 ever. My average since new is under 17mpg.
Those wheels sorts look like the Tundra wheels.
Hey [MENTION=104049]marshal[/MENTION]. I had a rental SR5 in August out in California. Drove from LA-San Fran-Bug Sur-Vegas-LA totalling something like 1,600 miles. I definitely noticed much better highway mileage. I could easily get over 20mpg and sometimes I was at 21-22 despite doing 75-80mph the majority of the time. Lots of mountain passes out there too. Even in day-to-day light driving 18mpg was very achievable. With my LE I rarely see above 18mpg on the highway and I'm not usually much better than 17-18 ever. My average since new is under 17mpg.
But there isn't a milage difference between all the grades of 4runners currently. I suppose that could change, but you're still dealing with poor aerodynamics and body on frame weight. It's a truck, more specifically - it's a land cruiser in a different body.
The 4Runner is related to the Land Cruiser Prado (which is very close to the Lexus GX 460). It is not related to the Land Cruiser. The Land Cruiser is built on a different platform and is wider, longer, and heavier than the 4Runner.
Go drive a 2016 4Runner, GX 460 and then a Land Cruiser. You will instantly see the difference.
They're still land cruisers, and I'm not confused. I could easily say land cruiser and be referencing the 70 series. The 200 series isn't the only land cruiser currently being built. Semantics.
In the US, if you go to Toyota's web site and look for the "Land Cruiser", what do you see?
The 200 Series.