There ya go Zak, I fixed it for ya...
Oddly enough, my wife and I were just talking about tattoos tonight and an interesting subject came up. She works with 2 people (at an engineering firm) that have been dating for a short while (<6 months). Apparently they are talking about getting matching tattoos.
My wife (while perfect in almost every way) is deathly afraid of needles so does not have, nor will ever have a tattoo. Needless to say, she doesn't understand the appeal. I, on the other hand, do have a few so she asked my opinion of this.
Now, I know everyone has their own personal code or opinion about this. But, I told her I would never, ever get anyone's name tattooed on my body. To which, she replied, not even mine or our son's? Again, I replied, "never." In my opinion, getting your kid's names tattooed on you is more acceptable than a wife's or (heaven forbid) a girlfriend's name. But, I thought I would throw this question out to the group, what do you think? Would you get a matching tattoo with someone you've been dating less than 6 months?
In my opinion, tattoos are supposed to be body art. In high school girls like to doodle the super dreamy boyfriend's name on the notebook and that is artistic, but also not permanent. I told my wife that I love her and expect to be together until one of us dies, but I would still never feel the need to tattoo her name on my body. Sarcastically, I'd say, what's the point, in case you forget their names? But, I understand some people choose tattoos based on what is important to them, and what could be more important than their kids? And, while I do have framed pictures of my son throughout my house, I still don't feel like that is art or the need to tattoo his face or even his name on my body because that is not the type of art I would want on my body when I'm 70 years old.