Sat in two 2010's today

andycapp

New member
I found out earlier this week that a nearby dealer (NC) was doing training today on the new 4Runner, so I stopped by to check them out. Here are my impressions:

Exterior
It looks good in 3D. Many cars struggle to look good online or in brochures and it really takes seeing the new one in 3D to do it justice. I originally thought it looked too soft, but it was parked next to a Highlander and that is when you realize how much more muscular it looks than its sister. It's also a bit larger, but unless you see them side-by-side you probably won't notice that. The rear bumper is also really low which looks like it will make loading and unloading items easy, and doesn't detract too much from the look of the car. I'm sure it hurts departure angle a bit, but that isn't a major concern of mine. Others were definitely right that it needs projector head-lamps and LED tail-lights. The closing of the doors seems solid and not as cheap as others have commented either. The wheel and tire combo on the SR5 looked better than the Limited. The Limited needs wider wheels and tires -- they looked too skinny.

Interior
I'm only 6'3" but once again the 4Runner seems to be built for people who are shorter (or built differently) than me. I didn't buy a 3rd Gen because there wasn't enough headroom and this one just barely had enough. I had to lower the power seats (which had the upgraded weather-resistant fabric that seemed nice) all the way and then recline the seat so I could sit without slouching. I'm sure the sunroof in this one takes up an extra inch, but I would like a sunroof, so getting rid of it is not an option. Overall I would say the interior and the materials are good enough. The plastic doesn't feel quite as cheap as others have stated, but I'm driving an old Xterra so I'm used to cheap interiors. The back seats had decent leg room, but again the headroom was a bit lacking for someone my size. I could slouch and tolerate it for a while though. The center arm-rest in the rear seems like a poor design. It's too thin and I would have to lean over to rest my forearm on it. Neither car had a 3rd row seat and that pissed me off. One of my main goals was to see how small that third row was and if a car seat would fit back there, but I was not able to test that out. Both had those slide out trays and I didn't really mess with them.

Pricing and Availability
There was a 2wd SR5 with power-seats and sunroof with an MSRP of $32k and a Limited with NAV for $40k. I don't remember the specific breakdown stated by the salesperson, but it sounds like a majority of the 4Runners made will be SR5 models (over 70%) with Limited models being next (around 20%) and Trail models (under 10%). Early November 2010 is when they are supposed to start showing up here.

Overall
I'm not ready to write this car off, but I'm less optimistic than I was a few days ago based on the headroom. I just can't buy a car if I don't fit comfortably. I also do not think I'm willing to pay $40k for the Limited version of this car. Many will, but I probably will not. The SR5 was nice enough and I would pay $32k if it had 4wd and if the 3rd row was usable for a child-seat, but it sounds like that model would probably cost closer to $35k.

(EDIT: spelling and added description about wheels and tires)
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Thanks for the post. Would you say that there is more headroom in the 5th Gen than the 4th Gen? I'm also very interested in this aspect because I'm tall, too.
 
Thanks for the post. Would you say that there is more headroom in the 5th Gen than the 4th Gen? I'm also very interested in this aspect because I'm tall, too.

I would say there is a bit more than the 4th Gen, but I can't quantify it. Three friends have 4th Gens and I think I recline the passenger seat quite a bit when I ride with them.

My big problem is that I have short legs (or a long torso) based on my height, so some that are my height or taller with different proportions will be just fine.

I was able to get comfortable with the wheel and pedals though -- the tilt and telescopic action worked well.
 
Here is a comparison between the 4th and 5th gen:

Headroom W/O moonroof: 4th gen=39.7 5th gen=39.3

Headroom W/ moonroof: 4th gen=38.3 5th gen=38.6

Shoulder room: 4th gen=58.0 5th gen=57.8

Hip room: 4th gen=55.3 5th gen=56.5

Leg room: 4th gen=41.8 5th gen=41.7

You gain .3 in. with a moonroof, lose .4 in. without.
 
Here is a comparison between the 4th and 5th gen:

Headroom W/O moonroof: 4th gen=39.7 5th gen=39.3

Headroom W/ moonroof: 4th gen=38.3 5th gen=38.6

Shoulder room: 4th gen=58.0 5th gen=57.8

Hip room: 4th gen=55.3 5th gen=56.5

Leg room: 4th gen=41.8 5th gen=41.7

You gain .3 in. with a moonroof, lose .4 in. without.

Thanks. This is disappointing. One of the reasons I had waited for the 5th Gen was that I had read that it was going to be a little bit bigger (and, I hoped taller). In the 4th Gen, I am too big to get a moonroof, and now it looks like they've gone even shorter without a moonroof.

I guess I am going to have to wait to actually sit in one to see. :wtf:
 
Here is a comparison between the 4th and 5th gen:

Headroom W/O moonroof: 4th gen=39.7 5th gen=39.3

Headroom W/ moonroof: 4th gen=38.3 5th gen=38.6

Shoulder room: 4th gen=58.0 5th gen=57.8

Hip room: 4th gen=55.3 5th gen=56.5

Leg room: 4th gen=41.8 5th gen=41.7

You gain .3 in. with a moonroof, lose .4 in. without.

Where do you think the seat is placed when this measurement is made?

I mentioned I had to put the power seats all the way down and I'm wondering if seats with a manual adjust can be made to sit that low as well.
 
When I sat in one at the fair the only reason it has more headroom is because they lowered the seat. The dash compared to my 4th gen is much higher. But I would bet if I measured the top of the dash to the floor on both vehicles they would be the same
 
One of my main goals was to see how small that third row was and if a car seat would fit back there, but I was not able to test that out.

Please don't put a child in a car seat in a third row. The third row in SUV's are never included in the crash test data (I don't think you'd really want to see the results). Most third rows in SUV's are in the crush zone of the vehicle.

I'd never let a kid ride in a third row seat. Most third row seats are only big enough for kids. Thus a third row is not useful for me.

Research it yourself before you decide to put your children back there.
 
Please don't put a child in a car seat in a third row. The third row in SUV's are never included in the crash test data (I don't think you'd really want to see the results). Most third rows in SUV's are in the crush zone of the vehicle.

I'd never let a kid ride in a third row seat. Most third row seats are only big enough for kids. Thus a third row is not useful for me.

Research it yourself before you decide to put your children back there.

With a car as new as the 2010 4Runner you are absolutely correct that we probably won't know for a while how safe the third row is.

Don't go thinking all 3rd rows are worthless, however. Most of the reading I've done indicates that fatality rates are only marginally higher for 3rd row occupants. For more info check out this:

http://carseatblog.com/?p=91

and for CR opinion on the topic:

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/...fety-of-thirdrow-seats-205/overview/index.htm
 
When I sat in one at the fair the only reason it has more headroom is because they lowered the seat. The dash compared to my 4th gen is much higher. But I would bet if I measured the top of the dash to the floor on both vehicles they would be the same

So are you saying that you thought, with the seat fully lowered, there is more headroom in the 5th than the 4th?
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,306
Messages
3,554,045
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top