I own an exotic car and on the advice of many I had it installed. But instead of putting it on my sports car I had it put on my 2005 Acura TL, which was brand new at the time. The film protects against small dings but it does have a couple of drawbacks. First, it is expensive, you can probably respray the front of a car for what it costs. Second, it has a shelf life. Once it degrades it is hard to remove, instead of coming off in a big sheet, like the way it went on, it comes off in bits. Finally, while it protected the area it was installed on the TL, everywhere it wasn't seemed to get road rash.
I also had it put on my wife's car, it is nearing the end of it's shelf life and will have to be removed.
I am not putting it on my 4Runner.
Gator,
Why not the 4Runner? Is your decision about the product or the truck? In other words, has your mind changed in regard to the film, or is it just that you feel differently about the 4Runner than your other vehicles? Thanks so much for the input--this is the insight I am looking for.
Just curious, why you didn't take advantage of the lifetime warranty considering it would've look brand new and at no cost to you, it even would have taken care of the variation with the rest of the car showing scratches etc.
Gator brings up a good point. How many members covered the entire hood vs. part of it?
I have it on all of my cars and don't have full hoods on any of them. On all of them, you can tell if you get right up on the car, but from 5' away, you can't see anything. It is a lot less noticeable than a huge rock chip. I got my TE with it installed.
How far up the hood does the protection go?