Toyota Showing Achilles Heel

Thai

Elite Member
Avalon shows dent in Toyota quality
Fixes sought for 'problematic vehicle'

Mark Rechtin
Automotive News / May 1, 2006 - 6:00 am

Quality glitches
Since the Avalon's 2005 redesign, Toyota has issued service bulletins to dealers on these topics

* Bad U-joint welds
* Faulty catalytic converters
* Leak in oil-supply line for variable valve timing
* Vehicle drifting

LOS ANGELES -- Alan Seider has owned 11 Toyotas since 1982, but his 2006 Avalon likely will be his last.

He says quality glitches have bedeviled his Toyota sedan, which he has driven less than 6,000 miles since he bought it last July. His dealer could not solve the car's problems. Toyota headquarters stonewalled his appeals, he says.

"There have been significant throttle control and transmission hesitation issues," says Seider, 45, a computer consultant from Roswell, Ga. "I've isolated 15 different rattles in the body work."

Seider is far from alone. Internet chat rooms such as Edmunds.com Town Hall are littered with complaints from Toyota loyalists about the redesigned Avalon, which went on sale in February 2005.

The Avalon's launch problems point to a larger issue. To meet demand, Toyota has added factories in North America and thousands of new employees. Executives are worried that Toyota's rapid growth may dilute its quality standards.

Toyota and Lexus divisions still exceed industry averages in various studies that measure quality. Toyota predicts that the Avalon will score well in J.D. Power and Associates' Initial Quality Study, to be released in June.

But the quality gap is closing. And Toyota recalls have spiked in the last two years.

Every production line produces its share of lemons. But Toyota already has issued a string of technical service bulletins to dealers to fix Avalons on the road. Changes are being made on the assembly line. Toyota representatives acknowledge there are some teething problems, but decline to call the Avalon a problem car.

The Avalon is the Toyota brand's most-expensive car, starting at $27,355 including destination charges. The redesigned 2005 model was embraced by consumers; Toyota sold 95,318 Avalons last year in the United States, up from 36,460 in 2004. Avalon sales peaked in 2000 at 104,078 units. It is assembled at Toyota's Georgetown, Ky., plant, alongside the Camry and Camry Solara.

First-year blues

It's a car-buying axiom that one should never buy a car in its first year of production, before the bugs are worked out. But in recent years Toyota and Honda largely disproved that old saw, delivering nearly bulletproof vehicles from Job 1.

Now the Avalon redesign is showing that even mighty Toyota can slip up.

Kevin Clingenpeel, a 37-year-old insurance litigator from Fort Mill, S.C., loved his Avalon for the first 2,000 miles. Then the transmission shifts became erratic, especially in cold weather. The engine developed a persistent knock, which could not be cured by changing grades of gasoline or by using a fuel-injector cleaner.

"I pulled up next to a Ford F-350, and I could hear my valve train clicking louder than his diesel," said Clingenpeel, whose Avalon is his family's third Toyota.

Clingenpeel says his dealer gave the car "a wink and a nod" when he brought it in three times for repairs. Clingenpeel then appealed to Toyota headquarters to send out a district service manager. Toyota refused. Now Clingenpeel is looking to sell the car.

"It's sad because there's a nice car hiding behind all this," Clingenpeel said. "But this is not up to snuff from what I would consider from Toyota."

Small irritations

The Avalon's problems have drawn notice from Consumer Reports magazine, which has for years given the Avalon high marks.

While still giving the 2005 Avalon its highest scores in most categories, the magazine's overall quality rating for the car was average because the Avalon scored below the Buick LaCrosse, Kia Amanti, Ford Five Hundred and Mercury Montego.

Anita Lam, data program manager for Consumer Reports' auto test center, said problems with the Avalon cropped up in steering, suspension and body integrity.

"These are first-year teething problems. We anticipate the second model year will be much better," Lam said.

Toyota spokesman John Hanson called the Consumer Reports ratings "the sum of small irritations more than anything else."

But Hanson acknowledged that Toyota has been concerned with the initial wave of quality problems for the car. Toyota's priority has been to find and remedy problems, get the fixes to the production line, and issue technical service bulletins so dealers can fix the faults on vehicles already on the road.

"The Avalon is the most complex vehicle Toyota Division sells, so just by definition it's a problematic vehicle," Hanson said.

The Avalon's transmission lurch is especially noticeable in low-speed crawls during rush hour, Hanson said. Previous Avalons had problems shifting smoothly at high speed with high engine revs. Toyota fixed the high-speed lurch by changing software algorithms, but the adjustment caused a low-speed lurch.

The low-speed problem "is all software," Hanson says.

Some customers are voting with their feet. In Seider's case, he replaced his wife's Toyota Sienna minivan with a Honda Pilot. He doubts he will replace the Avalon with another Toyota.

Said Seider: "I am so disappointed in Toyota. I've had previous first-year vehicles, but nothing like this ever happened. Toyota's build quality has declined in recent years, and there seems to be nothing the dealer can do. Toyota has reached a size that they've lost sight of the individual customer."
 
Register to hide this ad
Wow, the Avalon sounds like a German car!:D Or worst yet, a MERCEDES!:biggrin2:

In Consumer Reports April issue, the Avalon was listed as the least reliable Toyota vehicle ("average" reliability).
 
A funny post from another forum

bagdad_bob_large.gif~original


"There is no quality problem at Toyota. There never has been a quality problem at Toyota. The American infidel is no match for us!"

:p
 
Some new Camry (American assembled) and a few ES350 (Japan assembled) are having problems with their transmission. Toyota is not making an official recall. The consumer has to wait until the problem develops for them to look at it...because this problem is not a safety issue, according to Toyota.

Here is the link to ES350's issues:

http://clublexus.com/forums/showthread.php?t=214212

http://www.clublexus.com/forums/showthread.php?t=213422&page=1&pp=15&highlight=toyota+recall

Toyota isn't sending an official letter to customers or issuing a formal recall because the issue isn't a "safety campaign or safety issue," Toyota spokeswoman Allison Takahashi said.

Interesting quote from the Clublexus Moderator:

"It sounds like 32,000 vehicles might be affected (if 160 is .5% of the total), but they are assuming that only .5% will actually manifest the problem - probably within the first 500 miles. I'm guessing this is statistical assumptions based on in house testing. If they were going to do an actual recall, they would have to call back all 32,000, and then check and/or modify all of them. Instead, they having consumers drive the vehicles until they have a problem, then bring it back to be fixed (which they would have to do anyway under warrentee)."
 
In conclusion, i will NEVER buy a 1st year model, even from Toyota/Lexus. This is troubling because when the LS430 was introduced to the public a few years ago, it went right to the top in all quality surveys. Same for SC430.

Today, Lexus is not even immune to 1st year bugs. Hopefully, it has not fallen into what GM went thru in the 80's and early 90's with overexpansion and losing quality control in the process.
 
I agree that it's very disappointing that Toyota/Lexus is having so many first-model-year issues.
I had a 1999 Lexus RX 300 - the first year ever for the RX - and it was an excellent car. For that reason, I didn't hesitate to get a Japanese-made 2004 RX 330 - the first year for the 2nd gen RX. What a mistake... that 330 had way, way too many bugs. A few different rattles, computer issues with the transmission and the power back door (yes, there's a computer for that), and I even had a coolant leak one time from a plug on the block. The last straw was a whine coming from the heater/air cond. fan motor - the bearing was shot! It didn't cost me any cash to get things fixed under warranty, but it was a major hassle to go to the Lexus dealer and keep having them do major surgery on the car.
That's why I ultimately traded it for the 2006 4Runner. I have a Toyota dealer a LOT closer than a Lexus dealer, and the 4th gen 4Runner has been out for a while. It all worked out great - that Toyota dealer gave me a good price for both the 4Runner and the Lexus. I wanted out of the RX before word got out that the '04 was a lemon and it wasn't worth anything.
 
"His dealer could not solve the car's problems. Toyota headquarters stonewalled his appeals, he says."

"Clingenpeel says his dealer gave the car "a wink and a nod" when he brought it in three times for repairs. Clingenpeel then appealed to Toyota headquarters to send out a district service manager. Toyota refused."

What a huge shocker!!! I wonder how many times these customers were told this was all "normal". Can somebody post links of Honda pulling this kind of crap so I can feel better about being a Toyota owner?
 
Being this is my first Toyota , and am noticing a few thing's on my 4R with 4800 mile's , this scares the crap out of me.
 
I'm not sure if the blame can be completely pointed at the U.S. expansion. Many Toyota models have been made for years in the U.S.. In fact, I don't think this is the first Avalon manufactured at an American plant.

I think a huge part of the issue is the way the dealers (and Toyota corporate) handle the situations. I don't think it's too far fetched to believe that if you're spending $30K+ on a new car, it better be near perfect.
 
qs933 said:

I think a huge part of the issue is the way the dealers (and Toyota corporate) handle the situations. I don't think it's too far fetched to believe that if you're spending $30K+ on a new car, it better be near perfect.
It's fairly far-fetched actually.....because you can spend triple that on European competition and wind up with a vehicle with a rat's nest of an electrical system. You can also spend 70K on a new Z06 and have the roof panel fly off at highway speeds. Or a 130K Ford Gt with 3 recalls before the first one sold. Or....well, you get the picture. Every vehicle/brand will have some issues PERIOD. All you're doing by buying a Toyota is lessening your chance. You could find sob stories like this on any vehicle ever.....remember; for every guy out there that thinks his Lexus LS430 is the worst car ever, there is another guy who swears his '76 Vega is the best vehicle built.

Besides, this article sounds like a nice piece of proaganda....I wonder how the Big Three split up the bill? On second thought, Ford and Chevy probably forgot their wallets at home....
 
Last edited:
this is my first toyota and i'm overall satisfied. but i too have a problem and it's the front driver seat rattle when the car makes a sudden turn or stop. this is a well-known and well-documented problem for the 4th gen t4rs. what really disappoints me is the fact that, even after the 4th gen's been out for several years, the mighty toyota havent been able(or willing) to give it a fix. it's a minor issue and i'm not planning to take it to the dealership unless it gets worse.

toyota may be better than most but it's not perfect.
 
Unfortunately :happens: Toyota has had worse problems in the past, sludge for one. If this was a domestic vehicle you would have not even heard of it, but because it is a Toyota, it is the end of the world! All other loyalists will try and make Toyota look bad, thinking that it will help make their vehicle look better. It is just like any other product that is considered the best; everyone wants to throw them under the bus.

Koz
 
Koz said:
Unfortunately :happens: Toyota has had worse problems in the past, sludge for one. If this was a domestic vehicle you would have not even heard of it, but because it is a Toyota, it is the end of the world! All other loyalists will try and make Toyota look bad, thinking that it will help make their vehicle look better. It is just like any other product that is considered the best; everyone wants to throw them under the bus.

Koz

The major issue to me is Toyota's unwillingness to fix the problems. I agree that no vehicle is perfect, but are the other manufacturers blowing off their customers this badly? This emerging campaign of everything being "normal" is unacceptable.
 
Iowa4Runner said:
The major issue to me is Toyota's unwillingness to fix the problems. I agree that no vehicle is perfect, but are the other manufacturers blowing off their customers this badly? This emerging campaign of everything being "normal" is unacceptable.

This attitude is no different then most of the other manufactures. Unfortunately most manufactures only fix problems when forced or when someone complains enough. This is one problem that Toyota shares with all the other manufactures. They ALL suck!

Koz
 
Northof49 said:
It's fairly far-fetched actually.....because you can spend triple that on European competition and wind up with a vehicle with a rat's nest of an electrical system. You can also spend 70K on a new Z06 and have the roof panel fly off at highway speeds. Or a 130K Ford Gt with 3 recalls before the first one sold. Or....well, you get the picture. Every vehicle/brand will have some issues PERIOD. All you're doing by buying a Toyota is lessening your chance. You could find sob stories like this on any vehicle ever.....remember; for every guy out there that thinks his Lexus LS430 is the worst car ever, there is another guy who swears his '76 Vega is the best vehicle built.

Besides, this article sounds like a nice piece of proaganda....I wonder how the Big Three split up the bill? On second thought, Ford and Chevy probably forgot their wallets at home....

Speaking of propaganda, this is nice piece of work as well. How many Z06 owners have had their roofs fly off? I found one confirmed case. Did the dealer refuse to fix it? Comparing a road legal race car like a Ford GT to an SUV is silly. I'm not going to explain why. The real question is, how many Z06 and GT owners have problems like erratic transmissions, rattling pistons, thumping drivetrains, popping seats, etc. that the dealer refused to fix?
 
Koz said:
This attitude is no different then most of the other manufactures. Unfortunately most manufactures only fix problems when forced or when someone complains enough. This is one problem that Toyota shares with all the other manufactures. They ALL suck!

Koz

Complaints don't seem to have any effect on Toyota's decision to fix things. It would have to be legal action.

It took a few phone calls to the dealer, but Subaru was willing replace the clutch on my Impreza (at the end of the warranty period) because sometimes it would shudder little when it was cold. It was merely an annoyance to owners with no safety or reliability issues I'm aware of. Can you imagine Toyota replacing a clutch in a similar situation? No way.

Yes, automotive manufacturers suck at honoring their warranties, but some suck worse than others...
 
When I was in high school a friend had a 1st generation 4runner. I loved that thing, simply because it was a piece of crap that just kept running. Looking back on the Toyota's from 20 years ago they were rust buckets--but they ran forever. I don't think I've ever seen a vehicle brand rust like the Toyota's did--they certainly don't have a history of perfect vehicles, and no manufacturer has a problem free future. Too much technology with too many unknowns to ever have a problem free vehicle.
 
Iowa4Runner said:
Speaking of propaganda, this is nice piece of work as well. How many Z06 owners have had their roofs fly off? I found one confirmed case. Did the dealer refuse to fix it? Comparing a road legal race car like a Ford GT to an SUV is silly. I'm not going to explain why. The real question is, how many Z06 and GT owners have problems like erratic transmissions, rattling pistons, thumping drivetrains, popping seats, etc. that the dealer refused to fix?

If you really want some true nightmare stories about SUV issues you really should visit a Volkswagen Touareg Forum.
The issues with the 4Runner pale in comparison to the VW Touareg and what some VW Dealers and VW of America have put their owners through.

It ia also very interesting to read about the NUMEROUS buybacks of Touaregs from their owners.
Most were under Lemon Laws but some were done without the threat of legal action.
 
charlier180 said:
If you really want some true nightmare stories about SUV issues you really should visit a Volkswagen Touareg Forum.
The issues with the 4Runner pale in comparison to the VW Touareg and what some VW Dealers and VW of America have put their owners through.

It ia also very interesting to read about the NUMEROUS buybacks of Touaregs from their owners.
Most were under Lemon Laws but some were done without the threat of legal action.

My brother is a VW Service Manager and he has told me about problems that are incredible and makes him wonder how anyone could be a loyal customer. Things like a $16K trans replacement on a brand new vehicle.

Koz
 
Iowa4Runner said:
Speaking of propaganda, this is nice piece of work as well. How many Z06 owners have had their roofs fly off? I found one confirmed case. Did the dealer refuse to fix it? Comparing a road legal race car like a Ford GT to an SUV is silly. I'm not going to explain why. The real question is, how many Z06 and GT owners have problems like erratic transmissions, rattling pistons, thumping drivetrains, popping seats, etc. that the dealer refused to fix?
I guess you missed where someone was trying to use money as a qualifier for a "perfect" vehicle.....my point was that no amount of money can buy you a car/truck/suv/boat that can promise 0 problems. Like others above posted, you can spend much more on a Toureg to have more serious issues, and that is a fairly comparable vehicle.

You honestly don't think other manufacturers have problems they deem as "normal" ? How about Dodge Caravan automatic transmissions since the 80's? Or Ford 3.3L headgaskets all through the 90's? Or VW/Audi electrical system glitches for the last 15 years? You know why all these are shrugged off as normal? Because the manufacturers themselves don't even have a fix.....Eg WHEN your Caravan's tranny blows, you get the same part number to replace it. Just hope it's under warranty, because even tho every one does it, there has never/will never be a campaign.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,316
Messages
3,554,111
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top