US Automakers Could Go Bankrupt This Decade

Thai

Elite Member
Analyst Predicts US Automakers Could Go Bankrupt This Decade
The Daily Auto Insider
Friday, May 30, 2003
May 2003

A recent research report published by UBS Warburg contends that if current trends in the automotive industry continue, GM or Ford could go into Chapter 11, or Chrysler could be dropped from DaimlerChrysler, the Dow Jones newswires reports.

Saul Rubin, auto analyst at UBS Warburg, would not indicate which company is the most vulnerable, but said bankruptcy could overtake any of the three in the next five to ten years. He did say continuing current strategies and trends combined with a moderate performance in the equity markets would push Ford to the brink. A weakening in Mercedes business combined with a change in management at DaimlerChrysler, he thought, could lead to the ejection of Chrysler from DCX. In his forecast for GM, Rubin said declining equity markets combined with general deflation and double-digit health care inflation over a number of years would be insupportable for GM.

The Big Three have adequate liquidity now, but carry a heavy debt in a low to non-growth market. Rubin also predicted that the market share of the three automakers would slip to 50 percent after a high of 90 percent in the late sixties due to stiff competition from foreign automakers. Rubin also predicts that heavy profits from light truck sales, which have shored up the U.S. automakers, will be siphoned off by foreign competitors in coming years.
 
Register to hide this ad
bankrupt

Doesn't suprise me, how sad. American car companies keep repackaging and reselling the same piece of crap over and over again. How many variations of the GM 3.1 Monte Carlo can they rebadge? Pontiac, Chevy, Buick, it is essentially the same vehicle with a different cover. And the build quality, value, craftsmanship, reliability are very inferior to at least Toyota and Honda. Ten years from now there will probably be only Chevy, Cadillac, GMC Truck and Ford left as American car companies. Chrysler will be dropped by MB and GM/Ford will drop their crappy divisions aka. Pontiac, Buick, Saturn and Mercury/Lincoln. Comparing an '03 Toyota 4Runner to a '03 Chevy Tahoe is like comparing a Model T to a Z06 Corvette, no comparison. Toyota is in a league far and above any domestic.
 
Sac, all I can say is...the domestics should start looking really hard at how Toyota does things. After living with my new 4Runner for a few days, and reading the owner's manual, it really is Oh what a feeling! They seem to be the car company for the people...the new Volkswagen! Giving us everything we want at very affordable prices. I had a '78 SR5 Corolla hatchback that had many shortcomings, but it was dead reliable and was designed to be very easy to work on. This new 4Runner seems to be carrying on that thoughtful design. I was shopping new Ford Ranger pickups 7 months ago...V6...and was amazed that you had to bend one of the large radiator hoses out of the way in order to pull either the auto trans dipstick or the engine oil stick!

I've always been a BMW guy and have driven 3.0 and 4.4 X5's and crazy as it may seem, I don't think I'd trade this V8 truck for either of those!
 
I had a BMW 325ix, nice car, stranded me a few times and had to call the dealer to tow it in, this from a new car! I traded it in when I was told the front brakes alone would cost $750. Two days after selling it back to the dealership the dealer called and asked if they could purchase my extended warranty, that the transmission just died in it. After owning an '02 Runner and a '95 Corolla and now a '03 Runner, I am Toyota for life. I feel like I am driving a miniature Land Cruiser and saving $25,000!:arrow:
 
As Friday would say, "Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts" A co-worker sold her 330 for a Pathfinder because the dealer wanted $1000 for brakes, oil change and tire rotation. YIKES!
 
Wow! That's a lot! Is your coworker out-of-warranty?? My BMW M3 is taken care of for 4 years/50,000 miles...the ONLY cost for me are tires and fuel. Everything else BMW will cover. And this is standard on all BMW for 2003.

In 2002, i think it was only 3 years/36,000 miles. Your coworker may have been a 2001??

Wow, at $1K for these things, i think i have to sell my bimmer just when warranty expires!:(
 
Thai: That M3 must be incredibly awesome. But I'd keep a watchful eye on that suspect crank bearing thing, and that SMG will be truly a nightmare once out of warranty.
 
Swaro, i know! However, BMW claims that they have strengthened the engine & reprogrammed the ECU in '02 to avoid the early production M3 mishaps (rough start and engine failure). In addition, they automatically extended all M3 engine's warranty to 6 years/100,000 miles. The mistake i have seen so far from owners is that they do not follow the proper break-in procedure. M3 has a very specific break-in procedure you MUST follow to avoid engine problems later on (oil consumption most commonly). BMW has even placed a sticker on the windshield of new BMW M3's to remind owners what to do.

For me, i broke in my M3 properly. No extra oil consumption to date. No rough idle (remember, the M3 engine will always be slightly rougher than regular 3-series engine). No stalling. Nothing. Damn fast!

SMG has proven to be quite reliable thus far. There have been 1 or 2 sporadic failure on M3 forums, but no more than a regular auto transmission.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,316
Messages
3,554,107
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top