Re: V8 vs V6
Larry said:
I read that the V8 in the 4 Runner is much better than average for maintenance and the V6 is much worse.
I bought the V8 because I expected it to be like the Tundra V8 and the idea of a V6 does not appeal to me. I think of a V6 as a packaging solution and a shaker that has to employ tricks to run smoothly.
I am happy with my choice except for one minor detail, the oil filter location. On The V8 you have to remove the forward skid plate and the V6 is up on the very top. Other that that, you can hardly tell the engine is running at times and it has enough power to suit me.
What exactly do you mean by better then average for maintenance, the only difference that I know off hand between the 2 engines is the V8 needs a quart more oil, but overall cost of ownership would be equal between the 2.
The V8 came out in 2000 or early 99 as a brand new engine and it had it's minor problems just like the current 4.0 V6 but still their are many happy owners with V8 built in 99/00 that have no problems that others experienced, the V6 sounds like a V6 what more can you expect.
The V8 was a smart move by Toyota and probably grabed more customers who would have looked at Sequoias or other models with V8, some guys are just die hard V8 and now I understand why.
As to what you say as the V6 being a packaging solution, your right, but the same can be said for the 3rd gen when they had commercials advertising a 4Runner for less then 20k, it's all about what gets customers in the dealerships.
I've changed the oil on my truck and the filter is in a pretty good location easy and clean in my opinion, actual puts a smile on my face after changing the oil on my Pathfinders.
The engine is smooth, I luv it:50cal: and drive hard gunning it even to go a block, the power is good for now until I get an SC but even if I had a V6 I drive it the same way.