BlackWorksInc
New member
Wait... So the spikes are a bad idea? How else do you catch people when chasing them down? 
You know, something like welding 2' sharpened-steel spikes on your Shrockworks to impale anyone who gets in your way.
If modifying a vehicle's ground clearance or bumpers was liability, you'd probably hear more about folks in lifted pickups or with oversize tires getting sued.
Wait... So the spikes are a bad idea? How else do you catch people when chasing them down?![]()
One more thing that just came to mind...IF this person was at fault, then i wonder if his insurance company will even pay and/or defend him! Or if this lady comes back and sue him, then i am not sure if his insurance company will have his back.
Usually the bumpers on these car are part of the crumple zone. They are usually filled with impact absorbing foam. And remember, crumple zone is of benefit to BOTH vehicles in an accident, not just the one that it is fitted to.
I think that the insurance company might say that, in the event of an accident, your vehicle isn't roadworthy as the bumber didn't meet vehicle standards xxx (set out by NHTSA) and isn't compliant with the manufacturers specification. Insurance Co. then void your policy in the event of an accident to save money, and you would have given them grounds to do so, in which case you may end up footing a rather massive legal and settlement bill.
Just wondering....
One more thing that just came to mind...IF this person was at fault, then i wonder if his insurance company will even pay and/or defend him! Or if this lady comes back and sue him, then i am not sure if his insurance company will have his back.
Usually the bumpers on these car are part of the crumple zone. They are usually filled with impact absorbing foam. And remember, crumple zone is of benefit to BOTH vehicles in an accident, not just the one that it is fitted to.
I think that the insurance company might say that, in the event of an accident, your vehicle isn't roadworthy as the bumber didn't meet vehicle standards xxx (set out by NHTSA) and isn't compliant with the manufacturers specification. Insurance Co. then void your policy in the event of an accident to save money, and you would have given them grounds to do so, in which case you may end up footing a rather massive legal and settlement bill.
Just wondering....
Has the 4Runner been checked yet? Do we know there's no frame damage? This speculation may be moot if there was some frame crumple...
Probably not a bad idea, all things considered.Its nice to have people like you in the world to keep people like me who would want to buy the bumper in check. After the questions and statements you have posed I will keep my stock bumper for my protection and for the protection of the other morons on their cell phones because Lord knows :happens:
Probably not a bad idea, all things considered.
I'd hate to see what the clevis pins on that bumper would do to a plastic bumper cover.
Like a couple of years back in a right-turn-into-merge where I bumped a little old lady who took off to merge, only to slam on her brakes rather than actually merging, while I was slowly pulling out too, and looking over my shoulder, not at her failing at the merge. All my fault, but no harm at all done, not even a scratch to either vehicle.
There's some good points pro and con for aftermarket bumpers. I think one important aspect is that there are many government vehicle's (police, park ranger's, border patrol, etc.) that all put aftermarket gear including arb bumpers, on their vehicles to make them safer and more capable in their line of work. That makes me not worry too much about a law suit.