Winter Test: 4runner V6 4wd

Thai

Elite Member
January 17, 2006

Winter Test:
2006 Toyota 4Runner Limited
By Michael Clark

Winnipeg, Manitoba - This should be a no-brainer: the minute that another differential comes into traction play, the easier one should sneer at everything from slick road dustings to full-out blizzards. That confidence can quickly dissipate, right around the time that your 'ute hits the ditch.

While the usual culprit is driving beyond a vehicle's limitations for said conditions, a contributing factor is how well the various traction aids work together to keep one on the straight and narrow. This week, our lucky winter driving contestant is a 2006 Toyota 4Runner V6 Limited. I give a tip of the hat to Toyota for outfitting this press vehicle with Bridgestone Blizzak winter grips.


It's been a while since a V6 4Runner graced these parts, with the majority of press vehicles equipped with the 4.7 iForce V8. The 4.0- litre six is good for 236 horses, though with such features as Variable Valve Timing with Intelligence, you'd swear there was more on tap. It works well with the Super ECT 5-speed automatic, however, delicate throttle adjustments will have to be learned to keep the tranny from flipping between 4th and 5th gears for highway cruising. (Cruise control use is best avoided during the winter months to help speed up reaction time to slippery conditions.)

Most 'ute recruits wouldn't know a differential lock from their tube sock, so let's stick to shift-on-the-fly. A flip of the switch engages the four-wheel high mode, with nary a driveline shock or shudder. A noteworthy attribute is the ease of steering in cramped corners, even in four-wheel mode, without that feeling that you're about to shatter the transfer case or tear a front wheel off its moorings.

The big surprise is the lowly two-wheel mode. In simulated panic lane change tests, the correction brought on by the Vehicle Stability Control and the Active Traction Control System was almost identical to that in four-wheel mode. The traction control is so good, you'll probably only flip to 4-HI when the next 30 centimetre dump arrives.

There is the odd clunk 'n whirr from underfoot when the TC kicks in, which doesn't have the sound of voided warranty of less refined systems. The flashing dash light is accompanied by an audible beeping, which usually won't be heard until emergency manoeuvres occur, or when taking stupid chances. The truck-spec Blizzaks have plenty of grip, definitely worth negotiating into your purchase/lease arrangement.

HVAC is the usual dual-zone with auto temperature set. Full manual control, for those needing the assurance of fan blare, is easily actuated, and recommended for quick defrost. Heat is ample, and quickly delivered to the cabin, with the added plus of rear heat ducts. Limited means leather, which also means 5-step front heated seats. Rear defrost works as expected, however the rear wiper/washer seems a little clunky as it leaves the window to its "park" position. Wiper jams are non-existent, though windshield scraping isn't the easiest, even when you're working from the included running boards. All 'utes, cute or brute, should consider an optional electric-heated windscreen as part of a cold weather package.

Your dependency on creature comforts will cost you, an additional $9,990 for the Limited V6 package, on top of the $39,960 MSRP. The best part is that all of those wonderful traction-action systems are included at the base MSRP level, including Hill Start Assist and Downhill Assist Control, plus transfer case and fuel tank skid plates.

That means when winter finally winds up, you're all set for back country exploring. Unless you need to tow more than 5000 pounds, the V6 is all the 4Runner you're ever going to need. Most Toyota dealers are quite diligent with their offers of snow tire and rim packages for easy seasonal changeover. Check with your local dealer.
064runner-winter_1.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
Re: Snow Tires

Gromulus said:
Hmmm. Sort of stacking the deck with the Bridgestone Blizzaks.

Well, I'm not sure if leaving it with stock all-seasons for a *winter test would be the responsible thing either.

I guess the issue here is finding out the capabilities of the truck in winter conditions given proper equipment?

However, magazine tests hardly swap the tires out for off-road testing
 
It's funny how you NEVER see the 4Runner included in any of the current comparisons. It seems that the focus is only on new or redesigned vehicles even when there is an older designed better vehicle. If they include it, they find a stupid reason to knock it down. I noticed this in the motorcycle industry also.

Koz
 
Koz said:
It's funny how you NEVER see the 4Runner included in any of the current comparisons. It seems that the focus is only on new or redesigned vehicles even when there is an older designed better vehicle. If they include it, they find a stupid reason to knock it down. I noticed this in the motorcycle industry also.

Koz

Koz, I agree with you on this 100%.

Current day automotive magazines are all about today or tomorrow's vehicles. They feel the need to showcase the newest vehicles and it would not look too good if a 4 year old design (like our 4Runners) kicked the butt of a new vehicle. (Although I would laugh my butt off when it happened.)

Unfortunately, the writers of auto magazines are paid (some people say by the auto makers) to talk up the new stuff. Should be interesting to see how some of the mags report on the new Toyota models (RAV-4, Camry, Tundra, etc). I suspect that these models might not get the same amount of ink that other vehicles get (unless there is something the writers don't like about them).

Speaking of reporting, has anyone seen any articles on the RAV-4? I have not been near a newsstand lately and that is the only way I see the auto mags since I gave up subscribing to them (not worth the time to read or money for me).
 
charlier180 said:

Speaking of reporting, has anyone seen any articles on the RAV-4? I have not been near a newsstand lately and that is the only way I see the auto mags since I gave up subscribing to them (not worth the time to read or money for me).

The only negitive I've seen so far was some road noise in the cabin.

Koz
 
I think he's asking. IF they have the new Rav 4 with the 6 cylindar and everything. Do they still need to produce highlanders? (right?)
 
a3fnqpjw said:
I think he's asking. IF they have the new Rav 4 with the 6 cylindar and everything. Do they still need to produce highlanders? (right?)


Exactly! The new RAV4 looks ten times better in my opinion.
 
Winter Test

I spent 15 years in Winnipeg, before relocating to British Columbia. I bought my first 4 x 4 while living there (95 Nissan Pathfinder), largely due to snow drifts. I used to do a lot of highway driving and would encounter large drifts of snow across the highway often in darkness. The increased vehicle height and weight of vehicle were advantages in these situations.

I just completed a 2000 km trip with my 2004 4Runner, with steel rims where Bridgestone Winter Duelers (Blizzaks?) are mounted . I encountered snow only for a short stretch and did not overly notice the 'howl' from the tires. With traction control, VSC, ABS and the 4 dedicated winter tires, I feel comfortable should I encounter winter driving conditions

Lefty
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,306
Messages
3,554,046
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top