Young Engineers Using 5th Gen 4Runners

1engineer

Moderator
I try to answer questions here as plainly as possible because let's face it, who really cares about the math right? Well, the truth is math is a big part of safety and vehicle design.
The Winch Power thread yesterday reminded me that safety is a key concern with most everyone and their 4Runners. In that thread I presented the concept of "Acceptable Risk" which basically means you decide on how safe you want to be with the mods you make.
Well, engineers try to be as safe as they can when they design products that can really hurt you if you are not careful. On that note it reminded me of a project my son just completed.
As some of you know my son is working on his BSME and is a junior this year. As many of you are engineers yourself, you know the third year is when you get into the meat and potatoes world of engineering. In my son's Advanced Dynamics class his team just finished up one of several projects. This one was on vehicle dynamics and included a "tripped rollover" component. A tripped rollover is a condition where a vehicle is sliding sideways and the tires hit an immovable object such as a curb. This project also included:
Skids
Slides
Roll Overs

My son's team, unbeknownst to me, chose my vehicle for their test. I won't bore you with the math but the project took about 16 pages. They also used ground conditions of:
Snow
Gravel
Wet Pavement
Dry Pavement

Their job was to calculate vehicle speeds in these conditions that would result in skids, slides, roll overs and tripped roll overs. It was also required they use grades of 0, 15 and 30 percent. I read the report and the professor allowed them a generous amount of assumptions such as location of CG, tire type, tire location, suspension dynamics and a host of other things that in real life could not be assumed. All in all it was a good report that interested me from a 4Runner owner's and an engineer's point of view.

My point to all of this is safety. We know there are some really good engineers working for Toyota and all this has been professionally calculated and tested by them long before we were allowed our first look way back in 2009. It is refreshing to know though that a new crop of engineers are learning about both vehicle dynamics and safety as they get ready to enter the real world, and such things as roll overs are getting re checked as projects in the classroom.
I won't publish any of the results here because with all of the assumptions the professor let them have the results will not be applicable to the real world. This was all calculated and theoretical so no 5th gen 4Runners were hurt as no actual testing was done. There was computer modeling simulations though! I can tell you this: The 4Runner was not in last place compared to other team's vehicles!
 
Register to hide this ad
I remember having a conversation with a CHP officer who explained that most SUV's making an evasive maneuver at highway speeds exceeding 60mph will roll, below they will typically slide unless hitting a static object.

While he admitted there are many variables, I found it interesting they'd pinned a specific number on an inevitable outcome.

It would be interesting to read your son's report.
 
Unfortunately, I think a lifted 4 runner (especially one without sway bars) might be in last place ;-(
 
I commend both your son and you. Real world applications are so good for students. The apple really does not fall far from the tree...
 
Maybe just a few tidbits of data. Please!

I remember having a conversation with a CHP officer who explained that most SUV's making an evasive maneuver at highway speeds exceeding 60mph will roll, below they will typically slide unless hitting a static object.

While he admitted there are many variables, I found it interesting they'd pinned a specific number on an inevitable outcome.

It would be interesting to read your son's report.

It looks a lot like this.
 

Attachments

  • formula1.png
    formula1.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 1,785
What I'd be interested in seeing is how the vehicles held up after the rollover and the projected amount of crush into the passenger compartment.

"Assuming" the 4Runner has four wheel ABS (another assumption. I can't find if its 2 or 4 wheel ABS) you shouldn't have any continuous skids of any significant distances (except MAYBE in snow or gravel). How did they simulate that, or was your vehicle N/A in those categories?
 
It looks a lot like this.

I actually remember that. I don't admit my engineering past most of the time as I moved on to another field after doing a few internships and discovering the real world and my make-believe world were different. Still have tons of admiration for the field and especially ME and aeronautical. I'm a geek at heart. I'm going to place my rig (post SAS) as the worst offender for RO risk. My kids will not be driving it. The wife only if absolutely necessary. That is my version of acceptable risk.
 
[MENTION=89562]bimrunner[/MENTION] I knew you were an engineer. Unfortunately you cannot blend in and your posts scream engineer!
To the poster who mentioned ABS one of the assumptions was no ABS and VSC disabled. That is why I didn't post results just the basic process. Hopefully this lets some of you have a glimpse into what engineers are learning, especially the safety aspect, as they get ready to go out into the world.
 
[MENTION=89562]bimrunner[/MENTION] I knew you were an engineer. Unfortunately you cannot blend in and your posts scream engineer!
To the poster who mentioned ABS one of the assumptions was no ABS and VSC disabled. That is why I didn't post results just the basic process. Hopefully this lets some of you have a glimpse into what engineers are learning, especially the safety aspect, as they get ready to go out into the world.

I actually switched out of engineering before graduating so I don't consider myself a real engineer. I love everything about the logic, math, precision, thinking... Details! I feel honored that my posts seem kinda logical though!
 
That's pretty cool! I've thought about taking some automotive specific engineering classes, it's awesome when you get a real world application of what you're doing in engineering since it's rarely delved into much detail how what you're learning is used, besides "this is a beam, pretend it's under your roof". That's one reason I designed my own suspension once I was part way through Strengths and Dynamics. It's awesome to have the hands on experience to go with the classroom which I think is severely lacking nowadays, especially when counselors blame the students when they don't succeed from just sitting in a boring classroom and a lot of engineering students enter the program only because someone told them since they were good at science or math, engineering was the correct field to enter--without the student ever knowing how or where engineering is used until they graduate. Hopefully I'll see similar problems as I'm entering my specialized courses, albeit in civil engineering.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,307
Messages
3,554,050
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top