The title should read "Would you still buy a 4Runner if you plan to NEVER offroad?" sorry for the mistake.
Just trying to do some comparisons here. I love the 4Runner reputation but the more I read the more discouraged I get. I hear lots of complaints about the metal used. I have never heard of any other cars hood flexing under normal highway driving. Are the breaks really as bad as some people say?
I want the most durable SUV in the price range (Limited). I originally thought that the 4Runner held this spot but get concerned reading reviews of people who owned the previous models and say this feels like a downgrade.
For the same price I can get a Mercedes GLK fully loaded, a Jeep GC Overland, and several other luxury SUVs that I had assumed would not be as reliable and built as well as the 4Runner but now I am starting to question if that is really factual.
So basically I guess what I am asking is if you never plan on taking it off the beaten path is it really an advantage to own cost wise over similarly priced SUVs with much more bells and whistles?
Just trying to do some comparisons here. I love the 4Runner reputation but the more I read the more discouraged I get. I hear lots of complaints about the metal used. I have never heard of any other cars hood flexing under normal highway driving. Are the breaks really as bad as some people say?
I want the most durable SUV in the price range (Limited). I originally thought that the 4Runner held this spot but get concerned reading reviews of people who owned the previous models and say this feels like a downgrade.
For the same price I can get a Mercedes GLK fully loaded, a Jeep GC Overland, and several other luxury SUVs that I had assumed would not be as reliable and built as well as the 4Runner but now I am starting to question if that is really factual.
So basically I guess what I am asking is if you never plan on taking it off the beaten path is it really an advantage to own cost wise over similarly priced SUVs with much more bells and whistles?
Last edited: