Every review I have seen of Toyota a Lexus products has been terrible by these idiots. C&D USED to be a good car mag. I Get the feeling that they nothing but tech kids for reviewers.
Every review I have seen of Toyota a Lexus products has been terrible by these idiots. C&D USED to be a good car mag. I Get the feeling that they nothing but tech kids for reviewers.
We all know its FAKE NEWS - Trump should shut them down...LOL
It's also called "Car and Driver" not "Off Roading and Overlanding", or "Car Reliability Report". If you honestly compare the way the 4runner drives to all of the other crossovers, or competitive SUV's like the Jeep Grand Cherokee or Dodge Durango that's why they give it 2 stars. It accelerates slower, does not handle as well and gets worse gas mileage. On the other hand you don't see any of those vehicles being reviewed on the Expedition Overland website, or 4wheeler magazine or anything like that. The reviewers could also give a rats ass about the long term reliability of the vehicle they are test driving. They are writing for a an audience that honestly is not most of the people on this forum.
Edit: There is also some data showing that there are a lot of people who could care less what Car and Driver Thinks...
http://www.toyota-4runner.org/5th-gen-t4rs/231430-official-5th-gen-4runner-sales-thread.html
CD used to review cars on functionality and ergos etc. Hell, they gave the new Camaro 5 stars, and that thing has to be one of the biggest fails in automotive history.
Well it's like that time a Jeep Cherokee was placed superior to a 4runner in off road capability, despite the fact the Jeep broke and they had to have Jeep engineers come out to retreive it. I have absolutely zero faith in these kinds of written "reviews" which function more like subversive paid advertisements than anything else.
2015 Four Wheeler of The Year - Super Showdown
It's also called "Car and Driver" not "Off Roading and Overlanding", or "Car Reliability Report". If you honestly compare the way the 4runner drives to all of the other crossovers, or competitive SUV's like the Jeep Grand Cherokee or Dodge Durango that's why they give it 2 stars. It accelerates slower, does not handle as well and gets worse gas mileage. On the other hand you don't see any of those vehicles being reviewed on the Expedition Overland website, or 4wheeler magazine or anything like that. The reviewers could also give a rats ass about the long term reliability of the vehicle they are test driving. They are writing for a an audience that honestly is not most of the people on this forum.
Edit: There is also some data showing that there are a lot of people who could care less what Car and Driver Thinks...
http://www.toyota-4runner.org/5th-gen-t4rs/231430-official-5th-gen-4runner-sales-thread.html
Really? Have you driven one? It's an amazing value... It's not for everyone, but to call it the biggest fail in automotive history is pretty short sighted.CD used to review cars on functionality and ergos etc. Hell, they gave the new Camaro 5 stars, and that thing has to be one of the biggest fails in automotive history.
Really? Have you driven one? It's an amazing value... It's not for everyone, but to call it the biggest fail in automotive history is pretty short sighted.
Bottom line, the 4runner is not a drivers car. Not even in the competition. In fact, Toyota has no real cars of any interest to the typical driving enthusiast. I guess you can count the scion/Subaru..., but they are mostly irrelevant in that space.
Who cares what a magazine thinks anyways. It's useful to get perspective from people who drive many cars, but that is about it.