2010 Toyota 4Runner Trail Edition: Review and Pics (TruckTrend)

[Omar]

OK, Here's a Playlist (59 videos) from Toyota Usa

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/p/A2206BD525470ADB&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/p/A2206BD525470ADB&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

 

[LyteFly]

Omar, while I find your choices quite interesting, this should take care of it

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=ToyotaUSA&view=videos

 

[Omar]

Trial Embeds!

Omar, while I find your choices quite interesting, this should take care of it

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=ToyotaUSA&view=videos

Thanks LyteFly, this was my first time embedding youtube videos into forums, I just chose random ones.. Anyway I deleted the first 2 and left the playlist and the "Revealed" videos.

I think users like the embedded videos better than links!

Can't wait to buy one.. Not sure though when will it arrive to Winnipeg!

 

[snap315]

I think it looks okay.

But it looks like Toyota has aimed this at those who wanted a Nissan Xterra but also wanted a little bit more by way of creature comforts.

Unfortunetly, I have been UPGRADING my vehicles (going from a basic fuel sipping econo-car with little by way of features, to a mid to compact sized SUV with a few bells & whistles, to a medium sized SUV with almost all of the bells & whistles). I went from a Corolla, to a S10 Blazer, to my current 4Runner. Each vehicle was better equipped than the previous one in all respects.

But I can't see a SINGLE thing about this 5th Gen 4Runner that is better than my current one.

If someone can point out the advancements and/or improvements, please let me know.

I will be passing on this one since I don't plan on going Backwards.

:moon:

 

[Fo_SheeZy]

I LOVE THE WHITE LIMITED!!!!!!! THATS WHAT I'LL GET AFTER I PAYOFF MY 07arty:arty:arty:arty:arty:

lol man there's no way I'd be seen in the soccer mom looking thing...

 

[tx 4runner]

But I can't see a SINGLE thing about this 5th Gen 4Runner that is better than my current one.
:moon:

The fuel economy is better, the interior is better styled, the trims are better differentiated, there are more bells and whistles (electronically, at least) to choose from, there is more headroom, the front is more aggressively styled, the gas tank door can be opened with your finger, and, most importantly- "Party Mode".

No one likes losing the V8 option- that loss in torque is a shame. But, this model is a great refresh of the 4th gen and turned out far better than anyone could have reasonably expected. With every new model, some options are added and some are deleted. I don't think the 5th gen is "going backwards" at all, except for the V8; which has been griped about ad nauseam around here.

 

[96743runner]

Wow, IMO the 5th gen is looking much better than I thought it would be. The only thing that kinda bothers me is the cheap looking plastic on the front.

The 5th gen looks great, but I would never get rid of my 3rd gen for it.

 

[Thai]

i dont like how the headlites and taillites stick out so far. looks like a indian person with those little thingys on the corner of their eye... :shrug:

Like FJ. Toyota does this for safety reasons. Most other manufacturers have side blinkers either on the side of the vehicle (BMW) or on the rearview mirrors. This way, when you signal to change lanes, a vehicle right next to you can see your intention. Toyota, for whatever reasons, does not like these side blinkers on their trucks. Thus, their newer models have protruded sides on the headlights and taillights so that a car next to the 4runner can see the blinking side lights.

 

[4Runner8]

yea and not t mention they look good too. bout to go to school but when i get home i am going to be all over the 5th gen

 

[elemint]

I like losing the V8 option. I am not too happy with the interior yet, and I dont know why they went with carpet when this is a "off road vehicle".

The fuel economy is better, the interior is better styled, the trims are better differentiated, there are more bells and whistles (electronically, at least) to choose from, there is more headroom, the front is more aggressively styled, the gas tank door can be opened with your finger, and, most importantly- "Party Mode".

No one likes losing the V8 option- that loss in torque is a shame. But, this model is a great refresh of the 4th gen and turned out far better than anyone could have reasonably expected. With every new model, some options are added and some are deleted. I don't think the 5th gen is "going backwards" at all, except for the V8; which has been griped about ad nauseam around here.

 

[Rock Slide]

I can't wait until they're five years old and I can afford one!

Ain't that the truth!

 

[Rock Slide]

Autoblog makes a good point:

Buyers can choose between rear-wheel-drive 4x2, part-time 4x4 and a full-time 4x4 system with a locking center differential. All 4x4 models get a 4.0-liter V6 producing 270 horsepower and 278 lb-ft of torque and achieving 17 city/22 highway mpg. V6-powered models with 4x2 do slightly better with 17 city/23 highway. The new 2.7-liter four-cylinder is only available on the 4x2 SR5 model and produces 157 hp and 178 lb-ft of torque while returning 18 city/23 highway mpg. Considering the marginal difference in fuel economy, we recommend the V6 and question why Toyota is even offering a four-cylinder option besides a lower starting price.

v6 it is for me.

For more info an photos: http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/2010-toyota-4runner-debuts-with-four-cylinder-trail-grade-model

 

[M1911]

I like losing the V8 option.

Why? With the 4th gen, if you didn't want a V8 you didn't buy one -- you bought a V6 instead.

 

[Thai]

I like losing the V8 option. I am not too happy with the interior yet, and I dont know why they went with carpet when this is a "off road vehicle".

Yeah, they should have made the Trail Edition with that rubber flooring in the FJ along with the waterproof fabric seats. That would be ultra cool!

 

[mosha20]

Yeah, they should have made the Trail Edition with that rubber flooring in the FJ along with the waterproof fabric seats. That would be ultra cool!

I'm almost positive it has the water-resistant seats that the FJ has.

 

[GMZ]

According to the Edmunds article, the torsen center diff is still standard on the SR5 and TE. It locks automatically somehow, which I'm curious to learn more about, but it can be driven in 4wd on dry pavement from the sound of it.

I can't wait until they're five years old and I can afford one!

The transfer cases for both full-time (Limited only) and part-time (both SR5 and Trail Grade 4x4s) models use a Torsen limited-slip center differential that essentially locks up when in 4Hi mode when front and rear driveshafts differences exceed a prescribed limit. With a set of torque-biasing worm gear and clutches, the system is both strong and relatively smooth in its transitions from open to lock.

Id rather be able to manually do it

The fuel economy is better, the interior is better styled, the trims are better differentiated, there are more bells and whistles (electronically, at least) to choose from, there is more headroom, the front is more aggressively styled, the gas tank door can be opened with your finger, and, most importantly- "Party Mode".

No one likes losing the V8 option- that loss in torque is a shame. But, this model is a great refresh of the 4th gen and turned out far better than anyone could have reasonably expected. With every new model, some options are added and some are deleted. I don't think the 5th gen is "going backwards" at all, except for the V8; which has been griped about ad nauseam around here.

Ill give you the fuel economy, but I like my interior. I thought the 4th Gen trims were well enough separated, I can tell them apart from a long distance away. More bells and whistles means more things to break. Headroom is also subjective, and Im tall. I love the latching gas door on the 4th Gen personally. I am liking the looks of the TE more than I thought though. I wish the SR5 wheels were part of the TE package though.

As far as the Xterra goes, my gf has one (2000) with 117K on it with no problems other than the A/C is giving out now. My roomate has a JGC and hates it!!

 

[snap315]

The fuel economy is better, the interior is better styled, the trims are better differentiated, there are more bells and whistles (electronically, at least) to choose from, there is more headroom, the front is more aggressively styled, the gas tank door can be opened with your finger, and, most importantly- "Party Mode".

No one likes losing the V8 option- that loss in torque is a shame. But, this model is a great refresh of the 4th gen and turned out far better than anyone could have reasonably expected. With every new model, some options are added and some are deleted. I don't think the 5th gen is "going backwards" at all, except for the V8; which has been griped about ad nauseam around here.

I knew the first thing mentioned would be fuel economy. If I wanted a gas sipper, I'd get some 4 cyl or hybrid econo-box car. The front end is more boxy, which means more wind resistance at speed and poorer aerodynamics than the 4th Gen. The interior doesn't look improved at all to me.

The added headroom IS an improvement however.

I'm wondering if it will stink of sulfur like some of the 4th Gens do?

 

[ToyTech99]

I knew the first thing mentioned would be fuel economy. If I wanted a gas sipper, I'd get some 4 cyl or hybrid econo-box car. The front end is more boxy, which means more wind resistance at speed and poorer aerodynamics than the 4th Gen. The interior doesn't look improved at all to me.

That's exactly what makes it all that more impressive. They updated the 4.0L V6 to produce more HP and torque, then put that updated engine is a more boxy and heavier vehicle, yet it still gets significantly better fuel economy than the current 4.0L V6 and much better fuel economy than the outgoing V8. Gotta give them props for pulling that off, even if you're a 5th gen hater. I would have never expected more power in a heavier and less aerodynamic vehicle to net better fuel economy.

 

[GMZ]

That's exactly what makes it all that more impressive. They updated the 4.0L V6 to produce more HP and torque, then put that updated engine is a more boxy and heavier vehicle, yet it still gets significantly better fuel economy than the current 4.0L V6 and much better fuel economy than the outgoing V8. Gotta give them props for pulling that off, even if you're a 5th gen hater. I would have never expected more power in a heavier and less aerodynamic vehicle to net better fuel economy.

I always find it amazing how much you can net from adding VVT-i/VVEL/VTEC or whatever on the exhaust side too. Not just power but the greater tuning potential that leads to more economy. When Nissan did that to the Z's they got a nice 10% jump, and even increased the mileage while they increased displacement and power for the 370.

 

[wis99ski]

I think this 5th gen marks the end of the FJ Cruiser for sure. Seriously, this thing looks exactly what I would expect if you crossed a 4Runner with an FJ.

I dont like the fogs, interior looks cheap, and the projector head lights are gone. Only thing I like is the gauges.