2020 TRD Pro Updates - Army Green & Push Button Start

That still baffles me. Like they didn't bother to design the sensor nicely into the visage of the Pro grille. My wife's Trailhawk has a super sleek low profile front collision/adaptive cruise sensor that you barely notice being there vs. Toyota basically strapping an old style lunchbox onto an otherwise killer looking rig. Annoying... it would bother me to look at that every day.

It would be nice if Toyota had their sensors in the windshield like how Subaru does it. I guess they went the easy route and slapped a sensor on the grille like they did with the TRD Pro Tacomas. Regardless, I am happy they are finally putting the sensors in the 4runner. Adaptive cruise control is a big win for me. Also, would of been nice if they had blind spot monitoring as well.

The updated instrument cluster with tire pressure monitoring and infotainment with Apply Carplay is also something to be excited about.

Does anyone know if the 2020 4runner will have wireless charging like the Tacomas do?

After seeing the Army Green in person. I think it looks great but I almost don't care for it anymore. There's too much hype around it and I am sure it will maintain a very high resale value but I will be content with Magnetic Gray and/or Super White. Wish they brought Barcelona Red/Inferno back or had TRD Pro in Tacoma's Silver Sky Metallic or switch the Magnetic Gray with Classic Silver Metallic.
 
Last edited:
Fine, this video comes out on my sister’s bday and not mine...

...happy to see the new infotainment screen, instrument cluster and the dual climate controls...

Calling my dealer to check on ordering one...
 
That still baffles me. Like they didn't bother to design the sensor nicely into the visage of the Pro grille. My wife's Trailhawk has a super sleek low profile front collision/adaptive cruise sensor that you barely notice being there vs. Toyota basically strapping an old style lunchbox onto an otherwise killer looking rig. Annoying... it would bother me to look at that every day.

Exactly. My wife's RX has some of the sensors cleanly hidden inside of the front emblem and behind the rearview mirror. Toyota: it's currently the year 2019, and every manufacturer has figured out how to conceal it and has been doing so for the past decade, I'm sure you can do it too.

We know Toyota is notorious for "decontenting" and have come to accept it, but this TSS sensor implementation isn't merely a side-effect decontenting, this is just straight up lazy. I often disagree with people (luddites) who hate TSS, CarPlay, and other now-standard technologies because someone told them "dRivIng NaNnY bAd, tEChNoloGy BaD, mAkE cAr UnReliAblE oFfRoAd (which they probably never go anyway)", but I do have to say that this black box fiasco is egregious and I would rather have the vehicle without it, if given the option. I pray C4 and other bumper manufacturers offer a solution for those of us who were waiting to buy a 2020.

People rag on Jeep guys and how they chalk all their qualms and issues up to being a "Jeep thing", but on the opposite side of the coin, Toyota has convinced their fanbase that a decontented, overpriced SUV has nothing to do with the fact that they can sell way less car for more money. The prices keep going up, and the features stay the same. Is it just a "Toyota thing" that we don't have LED headlights yet, but are paying hundreds if not couple thousands more for the exact same vehicle configuration from 2010? Seriously?

I don't think being historically reliable is enough in the current competitive market. With more options like the Bronco coming out, I really hope Toyota proves us wrong with the 6th gen that they're not out of touch with their 4Runner fanbase.

/endrant
 
For those of you hoping for a head unit that is swappable, they're generally so expensive - even moreso now with a larger, higher res screen and more multimedia capability - that you might be better off trading in or selling, and buying new.

Having seen the retail on some of these units over the years, they're generally $5-9K and that is just for the unit, not the wiring.
 
Last edited:
For those of you hoping for a head unit that is swappable, they're generally so expensive - even moreso now with a larger, higher res screen and more multimedia capability - that you might be better off trading in or selling, and buying new.

Having seen the retail on some of these units over the years, they're generally $5-9K and that is just for the unit, not the wiring.

agreed - I'd be shocked if it was less than $3k
 
I admit to being picky and particular about details, but if the implementation of the radar cruise sensor is as bad on the Limited as it is on the other models, I will be shopping for a 2019 instead of a 2020 (which I think it will be).

Manufacturers used those types of plastic plates in 2004 and 2005. If Toyota can't come up with a better integration in 2020, I think I'm happy to sit out the few extra features. That probably seems extreme but I REALLY hate the execution of the radar cruise sensor and a 2" larger head unit isn't a big deal for me.

post_8496_1107116574_1cd5de5622b34b258c85bc1c98e8a584587a35c3.jpg


heudwxda6nckyqgtt66t.png


mercedes-distronic-radar.jpg
 
Here's the things folks. Toyota isn't trying to make something nice. They are trying to add features as cheaply as possible to justify a higher sticker price on an aging product. It's classic "miking the cow" product strategy right out of an MBA textbook.

They don't want to have to redesign anything because that costs a lot of money (engineering, tooling up, adjusting assembly lines, etc.), so bolting a plastic slab on an existing bumper is infinitely cheaper than doing a good design where they have to design and manufacture new sheet metal, windows, wiring, etc. All that can wait for the next gen, if it ever comes. The rest of the features are just being moved over from the Limited, so they are "free" to implement too.

So they get a Pro w more features that only cost them $500 to add but that they will charge you $3k more for. Yee haw profit margin.

With the limited volumes they are selling, redesigning anything substantial would eliminate all profit, so don't expect it.

The good news is that most Limited features are now moved over other than puddle lights ... so next year will be more predictable, sans redesign.

I admit to being picky and particular about details, but if the implementation of the radar cruise sensor is as bad on the Limited as it is on the other models, I will be shopping for a 2019 instead of a 2020 (which I think it will be).

Manufacturers used those types of plastic plates in 2004 and 2005. If Toyota can't come up with a better integration in 2020, I think I'm happy to sit out the few extra features. That probably seems extreme but I REALLY hate the execution of the radar cruise sensor and a 2" larger head unit isn't a big deal for me.


post_8496_1107116574_1cd5de5622b34b258c85bc1c98e8a584587a35c3.jpg


heudwxda6nckyqgtt66t.png


mercedes-distronic-radar.jpg
 
Here's the things folks. Toyota isn't trying to make something nice. They are trying to add features as cheaply as possible to justify a higher sticker price on an aging product. It's classic "miking the cow" product strategy right out of an MBA textbook.

They don't want to have to redesign anything because that costs a lot of money (engineering, tooling up, adjusting assembly lines, etc.), so bolting a plastic slab on an existing bumper is infinitely cheaper than doing a good design where they have to design and manufacture new sheet metal, windows, wiring, etc. All that can wait for the next gen, if it ever comes. The rest of the features are just being moved over from the Limited, so they are "free" to implement too.

So they get a Pro w more features that only cost them $500 to add but that they will charge you $3k more for. Yee haw profit margin.

With the limited volumes they are selling, redesigning anything substantial would eliminate all profit, so don't expect it.

The good news is that most Limited features are now moved over other than puddle lights ... so next year will be more predictable, sans redesign.

Agree with your post, but two points:

On all other models, Toyota is implementing the radar cruise sensor into the front Toyota emblem. I'm sure they have enough of those around to have done a better integration, but I agree with your point.

Also, 4Runner is 11 years old and now selling in record volumes. It's not "limited" really... this generation has already paid for itself, probably approaching two fold.
 
Last edited:
Here's the things folks. Toyota isn't trying to make something nice. They are trying to add features as cheaply as possible to justify a higher sticker price on an aging product. It's classic "miking the cow" product strategy right out of an MBA textbook.

They don't want to have to redesign anything because that costs a lot of money (engineering, tooling up, adjusting assembly lines, etc.), so bolting a plastic slab on an existing bumper is infinitely cheaper than doing a good design where they have to design and manufacture new sheet metal, windows, wiring, etc. All that can wait for the next gen, if it ever comes. The rest of the features are just being moved over from the Limited, so they are "free" to implement too.

So they get a Pro w more features that only cost them $500 to add but that they will charge you $3k more for. Yee haw profit margin.

With the limited volumes they are selling, redesigning anything substantial would eliminate all profit, so don't expect it.

The good news is that most Limited features are now moved over other than puddle lights ... so next year will be more predictable, sans redesign.

Based on what I've heard/seen, most people don't think this way. Toyota has no incentive to do a massive overhaul(s) when sales continue to improve year over year. Clearly makes a good enough 4Runner to have people buy them. There aren't enough 4Runner buyers for Toyota to be kept up at night in how the 4Runner needs the latest and greatest redesign.
 
Here's the things folks. Toyota isn't trying to make something nice. They are trying to add features as cheaply as possible to justify a higher sticker price on an aging product. It's classic "miking the cow" product strategy right out of an MBA textbook.

They don't want to have to redesign anything because that costs a lot of money (engineering, tooling up, adjusting assembly lines, etc.), so bolting a plastic slab on an existing bumper is infinitely cheaper than doing a good design where they have to design and manufacture new sheet metal, windows, wiring, etc. All that can wait for the next gen, if it ever comes. The rest of the features are just being moved over from the Limited, so they are "free" to implement too.

So they get a Pro w more features that only cost them $500 to add but that they will charge you $3k more for. Yee haw profit margin.

With the limited volumes they are selling, redesigning anything substantial would eliminate all profit, so don't expect it.

The good news is that most Limited features are now moved over other than puddle lights ... so next year will be more predictable, sans redesign.

Nobody is disagreeing, in fact we all know this is why they're doing it. And as Gecko says, these vehicles are selling like hotcakes so I disagree that all profit would be eliminated by making a quality upgrade. Hell, they already have the tech and parts, just take a little more time than the no time they spent, and port it to the 4Runner. Sure, tooling might need to be changed slightly, but I don't think moving the sensor to a more discreet location would kill them or the reliability of the vehicle.

My gripe is that they're allowed to get away with it, and that they don't care to strike a balance between their profits and giving us features in a non-hamfisted manner. It's just a once sided cash grab, with crumbs here and there to keep us satiated. And, because there isn't much competition in this BOF off-road capable SUV segment sans Jeep Wranglers and yet-to-be-proven future models, there's nothing that's forcing them to change their strategy - and people like myself who have been holding off on purchasing until the 2020 model will still buy them because it's all we've got. It's essentially a monopoly in this segment where we take what we're given because what else are we going to buy, and as long as we keep buying Toyota is gonna think they can do things like staple a garish black box in the grille.

I love the 5th gen 4Runner, there are just some clear greed-driven decisions that leave me frustrated. There's no arguing that 4Runners are the best out there, but that doesn't mean it can't be better than what we currently have.
 
Last edited:
Ew wtf is up with the new chrome grill accent. Do they just completely ignore how people have been modifying these trucks for the last 10 years? Baffling honestly.
 
Nobody is disagreeing, in fact we all know this is why they're doing it. And as Gecko says, these vehicles are selling like hotcakes so I disagree that all profit would be eliminated by making a quality upgrade. Hell, they already have the tech and parts, just take a little more time than the no time they spent, and port it to the 4Runner. Sure, tooling might need to be changed slightly, but I don't think moving the sensor to a more discreet location would kill them or the reliability of the vehicle.

My gripe is that they're allowed to get away with it, and that they don't care to strike a balance between their profits and giving us features in a non-hamfisted manner. It's just a once sided cash grab, with crumbs here and there to keep us satiated. And, because there isn't much competition in this BOF off-road capable SUV segment sans Jeep Wranglers and yet-to-be-proven future models, there's nothing that's forcing them to change their strategy - and people like myself who have been holding off on purchasing until the 2020 model will still buy them because it's all we've got. It's essentially a monopoly in this segment where we take what we're given because what else are we going to buy, and as long as we keep buying Toyota is gonna think they can do things like staple a garish black box in the grille.

I love the 5th gen 4Runner, there are just some clear greed-driven decisions that leave me frustrated. There's no arguing that 4Runners are the best out there, but that doesn't mean it can't be better than what we currently have.

Very well said. It's all very lazy at this point - Toyota obviously decided that infotainment was going to be the biggest deficiency over the next 2.5 years, and put their dollars there. No doubt, that is a fairly expensive overhaul, but there are a number of things that are not even significant cost factors for a company like Toyota. The biggest three are:
- Offering new paint colors (this is an easy one because the material/supply can be pulled from other existing models)
- Offering new interior colors - across seating, stitching and trims (often you can just change plastic or leather colors and it's not a big deal at all)
- Offering new wheel styles (these too can be pulled from other existing models and painted or polished differently to appear new. There are plenty of wheel options from global Land Cruiser/Hilux/BOF models that could just be thrown into the supply chain for the 2020 4Runner and 98% of buyers would see them and think they're net new.)

Two other options that are slightly more expensive?
- Revising the interior of the headlight design but not altering the overall shape and body. Remember when someone from Toyota - Sweers? Hollis? - said they didn't want to include LED headlights because those would be more of a "major redesign"? :tsk:
- Revising the interior of the tail light design but not altering the overall shape and body (same bolt/clip positions, just new visuals)

The big one that I don't understand, specifically in the case of the 4Runner, is not including a 6AT or 8AT since both powertrain combinations exist in other global markets. It's clear that the 4Runner is living on some extended life, so it's not like a new model that has to use a certain volume of prepurchased parts before it can be upgraded. The 4Runner is past that. Sometime in ~2010-2012, looking at the 2014 refresh, they proactively decided not to swap out the transmission, then they did the same thing again somewhere around 2017 for the 2020 model. It seems inefficient to keep one old, garbage transmission when other related models use newer tech - just streamline the supply chain and apply the better transmission. There were no-brainer opportunities in the lifetime of the fifth generation where they could have easily upgraded and just decided not to. Annoying.

Imagine the 2020 bringing:
- 3-4 new exterior colors
- New interior trims
- New interior fabric/leather options
- New wheel design options
- New LED headlight design
- New 8" multimedia head unit with connectivity (what we got)
- New tach (what we got)
- TSS-P (what we got)
- 6AT or 8AT

... I'll venture to say that a MUCH higher number of us would be looking to trade into a 2020, and even the upgrades above are extremely minimal. These extra options would also help keep the 4Runner more fresh for both general return buyers as well as those cross shopping with the Wrangler, Bronco, 2021 Grand Cherokee, and even the 2020 Highlander (yes, it's cross shopped very often with the 4Runner).
 
As long as the back window still go down, it really doesn't matter. Although the price is going to go up, up, up for features we do no need. :eyebrows:
 
As long as the back window still go down, it really doesn't matter. Although the price is going to go up, up, up for features we do no need. :eyebrows:

I've been reading all the new features are to be standard, but would they really raise the price by THAT much on a 10yr old car? I'm curious as to how much everyone would guestimate the price hike would be.

I'm currently in the market for an ORP but on the fence of whether to wait for the new doodads for same/similar price on the '20 or getting an existing '19 model and haggle the shit out of the dealership.
 
For those considering a 2020, don’t let the negativity surrounding this update bother you too much.
The radar bar is ugly and probably could have been done better.
Mpg sucks but if you are looking for a gas saver then do not consider a 4x4
Transmission could be improved no doubt.
“Nanny” safety and tech features are not for everyone but do not let anyone say they vastly diminish reliability when these features have been around for quite some time in all vehicles including Toyotas.
If you have any sense at all Push button start and keyless entry will not be an issue in locking you out and leaving you stranded on a trail no matter what anyone says.
Yes there are things still left to be desired here but any company selling a product as easily as they do 4runners has no reason to advance too quickly. You are still getting a reliable, bad ass looking vehicle that is highly capable for what is designed for. Some People tend to be negative to justify their own purchases or taste, but the minor changes to the 2020 trd pro are appealing enough for me to move on from what could have been to deciding between black or army green!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,083
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top