Merninater
New member
I haven't been able to get a solid answer for a front lift question I have. I also posted it in "Rickashay’s OME vs. TRD Tundra/LC Review" which compiles a boatload of 1-2" suspension lift info.
Anyways I have a 2 part question that pertains to my setup shown below:
Front: 99 talls on 5100s-lowest perch and spring seat is not upside down (3rd gen 4Runner Model 5100s)
Rear: 906 coils with OEM shocks
Measurements Hub to fender are (I have an 02 w/ limited flares):
Front: 22"
Rear: 22"
1) I have read of a few people that report a 21" measurement in the front using tundra 5100s and the tundra trd progressive coils. Why did I end up an inch higher?
2) My 99 talls provide nice lift when paired with the 3rd gen 4Runner 5100s but my nose definitely likes to dive upon medium-hard braking. Would this be different with the TRD progressive coils or OME 881s?
I was really after the 21" measurement in the front and was surprised when I got 22". It has had probably 1000 miles to settle.
Anyways I have a 2 part question that pertains to my setup shown below:
Front: 99 talls on 5100s-lowest perch and spring seat is not upside down (3rd gen 4Runner Model 5100s)
Rear: 906 coils with OEM shocks
Measurements Hub to fender are (I have an 02 w/ limited flares):
Front: 22"
Rear: 22"
1) I have read of a few people that report a 21" measurement in the front using tundra 5100s and the tundra trd progressive coils. Why did I end up an inch higher?
2) My 99 talls provide nice lift when paired with the 3rd gen 4Runner 5100s but my nose definitely likes to dive upon medium-hard braking. Would this be different with the TRD progressive coils or OME 881s?
I was really after the 21" measurement in the front and was surprised when I got 22". It has had probably 1000 miles to settle.