Mr. Lambdebois
New member
blue2006 said:\try keeping an explorer for more than 100K miles, GOOOOD LUCK!
I disagree. I owned a (1st gen) 91 explorer since new and had very few problems with it. It was still on the original drivetrain and running strong at 174,000 miles when I sold it. The only problems I ever had with it were and leaking intake manifold gasket at 150k. And a vacum modulater fail at around 130k. Both were very miner. The 4.0l pushrod is proven even though it only made 150 hp orriginaly. My least favorite thing on the first generation exploreres were the automaticl locking hubs. IMO they were a weak link.
I also owned a 2nd generation explorer. It had the 5.0L V8 pushrod engine. It was my favorite of the explorers. The low end torque and fulltime awd served well in the mountains. It ran perfect with zero problems untill 178k miles at which point the inner tie rod bushing gave way in my rack and pinion. The 4r70w tranny mated to a 5.0l is a geat combo of proven reliability. I still drive it at 180K.
Now IMO the second generation explorers with the 4.0L sohc engine are the least reliable due to their trannies not to mention the engines do on average expeirance more wear compared to the 5.0Ls . simply speaking less torge equated to the v6's reving higher to produce the same go. Also my father owned one and had zero problems with it still ran fine at 105k when he traded it in for a 05 explorer with the 3valve 4.6L engine. The jury is still out on this engine.
When I was looking for a new suv I knew I wanted full time 4x4 with at least a solid rear axle and a V-8. The 4runner fit the bill for what I wanted and the new explorers did not due to it's IRS.
I hope I can get many more than 180,000 miles out of my 4runner. I am very happy with it so far. We will see how it holds up compared to the 05 explorer my father bought around the same time. I am not worried and am looking forward to my experiances with my first toyota.
Last edited: