ARB Summit Bumper

[MENTION=153324]mAtTyGlaz[/MENTION]

Your truck looks damn good with the ARB, really conforms with the rest of the truck. Have you noticed a loss in power because of the bull bar?
 
[MENTION=153324]mAtTyGlaz[/MENTION]

Your truck looks damn good with the ARB, really conforms with the rest of the truck. Have you noticed a loss in power because of the bull bar?

Thanks. A little but nothing crazy. It is one of the heavier bumpers out there but it is very well buit.
 
Easy answer: Bumper covers are $200. You can't make filler plates for $200. Want to go back to OEM - buy a new bumper cover.

Respectfully disagree. I understand what you mean, but as you know it'd cost well more than just $200 to get back to OEM between parts, paint, and labor cost and / or personal time spent. My point was more that it's a waste and doesn't look right... to me.

I realize that it's unlikely to return to OEM afterwards. I just think If they can make a whole bumper for ~$1500, they can certainly bring their design to below the headlights for $200. It's just that it's easier to bring the steel or aluminum straight across and cut the bumper cover rather than design something more form fitting. Just my opinion.
 
Functionally, it makes sense to cut the bumper. Aesthetically, it looks like poop. However, it is starting to grow on me.

I do like how this new rendition of the ARB bumper looks, I'm just not sold on the approach angle of the bumper and the weight.
 
Respectfully disagree. I understand what you mean, but as you know it'd cost well more than just $200 to get back to OEM between parts, paint, and labor cost and / or personal time spent. My point was more that it's a waste and doesn't look right... to me.

I realize that it's unlikely to return to OEM afterwards. I just think If they can make a whole bumper for ~$1500, they can certainly bring their design to below the headlights for $200. It's just that it's easier to bring the steel or aluminum straight across and cut the bumper cover rather than design something more form fitting. Just my opinion.

There's really no great solution. The front clip isn't well designed to fit an aftermarket bumper. The body lines simply don't work with any of them. So you have to choose something that compromises in some way.

I personally think the biggest mistake is to try to make the bumper so high for approach angle. First it looks funny because it doesn't match the body lines. Second it exposes all the the suspension components to rocks and such. Third and most importantly it doesn't actually do anything for function. The front approach is basically never a problem. Front tires turn. So a measured approach angle directly from the front is not a representation of actual use. The departure angle is where the 4runner gets hung up. Not the front. The steeply upswept sides on most are what detracts from visual appeal. ARB did a better job of balancing the visual appeal to me. Of course it's all subjective. What I like someone else probably hates. Just my opinion.

I think manufacturing the form fitting bumper in steel is a lot harder than you think. Try it once.

I would buy a $200 replacement bumper skin, paint to match, cut and keep my OEM bumper in a safe place. The paint doesn't have to match all that well because it'll be obscured by the rest of the bumper anyway. Plus it'll fight tight where you can see and have the flex gap where it's not as obvious. But you're right - it's probably at least a $3-400 cost. Most people never go back so they probably don't care about cutting it up.
 
Last edited:
Is there access above for the winch?

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

E8D4B256-7FA4-4852-B501-E49FCD79FE61.jpg~original
 
Other than the fact that this (looks) to not stick out as far, I agree. I can't understand why so many companies have us cutting through that area rather than just have an integrated solution- it can't be a weight thing for that small of an area. It's a total waste of the OEM bumper and it looks silly to cut through those design cues. I understand that at the end of the day it's about functionality but it just seems lazy. 4x4labs and Pelfrey are the only ones who have truly gotten the look right in my book.

/rant :keyboard:

Um ...pretty sure you spelled Shrockworks wrong LOL
 

Attachments

  • 20150327_205834_resized.jpg
    20150327_205834_resized.jpg
    137.5 KB · Views: 3,122
For what it's worth... when I installed my Schrockworks bumper, I left about 1/4" for things to shift.... first time out, I came down hard on the front corner. It shifted up and made contact with the sheet metal on both sides. I got home and readjusted it for more room. I've never had the same issue again.... so give yourself plenty of space.

You hit it right on the head as to why I don't like the design of bumpers similar to Pefreybuilt. If you are out there pushing it with one of their bumpers and have a similar experience, Id bet your headlights would be cracked or destroyed. I think this is often overlooked.
 
I just came to the 4Runner (17) from an FJ (13) and the cruiser forums. I also think it's kinda ridiculous companies are not coming up with filler plate solutions, 1500-2k plus for a bumper with lights and you want me to cut my OEM bumper cover to make it work. I was 100% going with Demello (local) until I did my research and saw the pictures on the web included a filler plate not offered. I'm sure when companies do offer filler plates they will charge some exorbitant amount. I love my Runner but the FJ had more reasonable off-road accessory options. It seems lazy and shows a lack of injunuity.

I'm aware the whole design is more complicated but at the rate we buy these custom parts I expected more.

Rant over.
 
Last edited:
I don't get the fear of cutting some plastic, or how the designers somehow quite.

It's a winch bumper...if you like your front plastic then leave it....or look for other options that preserve the look.

The main reason I like the new Summit bumper (which is what the thread is about) is how they conceal the bottom half of the truck...most bumpers leave a whole bunch of mechanical showing below the front...looks incomplete that way.
 
Um ...pretty sure you spelled Shrockworks wrong LOL

Nope, but they got the filler right at least. Back on topic though, the more that [MENTION=153324]mAtTyGlaz[/MENTION] shows off the functionality of this design, the better I like it. Like [MENTION=47340]Titanpat57[/MENTION] said, the lower coverage is really nice. That grille access to the winch looks really thoughtful too. Whew, that weight tho.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,309
Messages
3,554,067
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top