RaceAddict
Member
I got the Geolanders as standard equipment on my Limited and did not really care for them.
I could be wrong, but I believe the Yokos on the Limited are not the A/T G015.
I got the Geolanders as standard equipment on my Limited and did not really care for them.
SL rated would be fine. You think you are adding a lot of weight but in reality you are only adding about the weight of three adults and their luggage for a week. My only concern for your trip is if you are going into a desert or heavy shale environment. Sidewall thickness is really important there ( E rated is best for that) but then you will lose any good road comfort. Good luck.Thanks [MENTION=66316]1engineer[/MENTION] for the original post - made me even more torn about what to do, but in a good way. I was previously only considering the KO2s but the AT3's are now on my radar given that most of my driving is highway w/ only some forest and gravel roads and thus ride comfort and noise are more heavily favored.
What I'm struggling with is the load rating. Typically, the 112 rating on the C would be a non-issue (Toyota wants 113), but I'm about to head out West for a month of national parks sightseeing and am adding considerable weight to the truck in the form of rock sliders, ARB awning, cargo box, drawer/bed system + me and my pup.
Are the AT3 SL tires are sufficient for that type of weight, or would the C-rated AT3 or KO2 be better? To be honest, I've read a crapload of stuff but still don't fully understand how ply, load rating, weight rating, etc. all add up and what the recommendation is. Want to keep it safe and reduce the chance of blowing all 4 tires 3 hours in.
Also, I'm running a fully stock suspension on my 2016 SR5p 4x4.
Thanks in advance for any advice!
Thanks [MENTION=66316]1engineer[/MENTION] for the original post - made me even more torn about what to do, but in a good way. I was previously only considering the KO2s but the AT3's are now on my radar given that most of my driving is highway w/ only some forest and gravel roads and thus ride comfort and noise are more heavily favored.
What I'm struggling with is the load rating. Typically, the 112 rating on the C would be a non-issue (Toyota wants 113), but I'm about to head out West for a month of national parks sightseeing and am adding considerable weight to the truck in the form of rock sliders, ARB awning, cargo box, drawer/bed system + me and my pup.
Are the AT3 SL tires are sufficient for that type of weight, or would the C-rated AT3 or KO2 be better? To be honest, I've read a crapload of stuff but still don't fully understand how ply, load rating, weight rating, etc. all add up and what the recommendation is. Want to keep it safe and reduce the chance of blowing all 4 tires 3 hours in.
Also, I'm running a fully stock suspension on my 2016 SR5p 4x4.
Thanks in advance for any advice!
:cheers: [MENTION=66316]1engineer[/MENTION], I hadn't really thought about the weight in terms of people + luggage load. That makes sense.
One thing I notice is the substantial "softness" of braking on my crapo stock Grandtreks with the weight added to the truck. I know you said braking and handling mildly improved with the AT3's, and would be further improved with C-rated tires - guessing that's due to the stiffness of the sidewall?
So TL;DR - thicker sidewall = harsher ride but better handling, thinner sidewall = softer ride and softer handling?
Thanks [MENTION=66316]1engineer[/MENTION] for the original post - made me even more torn about what to do, but in a good way. I was previously only considering the KO2s but the AT3's are now on my radar given that most of my driving is highway w/ only some forest and gravel roads and thus ride comfort and noise are more heavily favored.
What I'm struggling with is the load rating. Typically, the 112 rating on the C would be a non-issue (Toyota wants 113), but I'm about to head out West for a month of national parks sightseeing and am adding considerable weight to the truck in the form of rock sliders, ARB awning, cargo box, drawer/bed system + me and my pup.
Are the AT3 SL tires are sufficient for that type of weight, or would the C-rated AT3 or KO2 be better? To be honest, I've read a crapload of stuff but still don't fully understand how ply, load rating, weight rating, etc. all add up and what the recommendation is. Want to keep it safe and reduce the chance of blowing all 4 tires 3 hours in.
Also, I'm running a fully stock suspension on my 2016 SR5p 4x4.
Thanks in advance for any advice!
SL rated would be fine. You think you are adding a lot of weight but in reality you are only adding about the weight of three adults and their luggage for a week. My only concern for your trip is if you are going into a desert or heavy shale environment. Sidewall thickness is really important there ( E rated is best for that) but then you will lose any good road comfort. Good luck.
So, I'm gonna have to be "that guy" here. I came from fairly worn, stock size P rated ATPs...replaced with 275 E rated KO2.Truth in this statement. I put E rated BFG K02's on mine and while they will be durable as a tank off-road they ride like crap on the freeway even though they are balanced and road forced properly. My wife says she doesn't notice the harsh ride but I definitely notice it personally. They sure look good though![]()
Hello all! New here. Hoping to be buying a 2017 TRD Off-Road KDSS this month. One thing I'm looking to do is work a deal with the dealer to swap out the sucky stock tires for something better.
Spend most of my time on city streets and several 4 hour road trips a year. So I want a tire that is quite, good in heavy rain, tracks well on the highway but is tough enough for the times I will be off-road, nothing too extreme. I also want something that will stand up to the horrible streets we have in town and not slash the sidewalls on a pothole.
Also don't want to kill my MPGs or get-up and go that is already lacking in the 4R.
I have the Goodyear Kevlars on my Taco and have been fairly happy with them. I think they could track better and be a bit quieter.
Seems like people are loving their Cooper AT/3s here. My cousin had them on his 4R and liked them much better than his BFG ATs he has now.
I'm open to a less aggressive tire, just want it tough enough for rough terrain.
Wouldn't mind going up a size to fill out the wheel wells either, nothing to the point of rubbing or killing mpgs. Truck will remain stock.
Any suggestions?
vondy21, I think the Cooper AT/3 is your ticket (I have a Trail with KDSS). Silica compound is great in the rain (a priority in the PNW) and I'm amazed how quiet they are for an AT. Just drove 3300 miles to and from North Dakota and I took at sweepers at 85 no sweat and it was easy cruising at 90. Got the C rated in stock size which is a good weight and didn't notice any difference in acceleration from the stockers though I had those for only 400 miles. (Found a shop that gave me $100 bucks a piece for them and Coopers are relatively cheap, too). Took three tries to balance is the only bummer. No complaints in dirt or snow (no real mud experience).