MDRCD said:
However, if you absolutely must, replace the HU, and the fronts first, as most serious audiophiles will get rid of the rears completely, since they just provide fill.
Dude, no offense, but no serious audiophile has any business listening to music in an automobile period. They would be better off replacing the stock HU with nav only and ripping the rest of it out of the truck, then upgrading the mufflers so they could listen to the engine while they drove.
No matter how much you spend, from what I've seen you will never make a serious audiophile happy with the sound in an environment with so many directional reflections, speakers in close proximities to the ears, and low frequency resonations as we find in any car. Listening is for entertainment only while driving.
That said, rear speakers should be utilized if for no other reason than to bridge the gap between the front stage and the subwoofers in the back. Even though bass is largely non-directional, there will be enough noise from it to tell where it is coming from and it just sounds funny when the highs are properly crossed in the front and the woofer is in the back.
Another reason to keep the rears is just in case you ever have passengers in the back seats.
Not trying to slam you here, merely offer a differing opinion...
Truth be told, the home stereo "audiophile" group irritates the shit out of me. "You would think that at $95,000 a set these speakers wouldn't have the amazingly harsh midrange and shrill highs that they come with out of the box. I was able to minimize this effect by moving the speakers 1.335" closer to the walls and by turning my head 3 degrees to the right, but it was still like nails on a chalkboard to me... " :bash: :FOS:
:jump: