LandCruiser
New member
I love how every thread turns into a trdp hating thread on here...
the original question had nothing to do with a pro, at all.
Good work everyone.
We're from the Internet and we're here to help.
I love how every thread turns into a trdp hating thread on here...
the original question had nothing to do with a pro, at all.
Good work everyone.
Care to elaborate on what you mean with your statement? What are you referring to with "maintain"?!? I'm not trying to funny, I would just like to better understand your statement. Thanks in advance.
apologies to OP for derailing his thread with this. and to be clear, i'm not fomenting a pissing match between you and myself. it's just that you state you're trying to inject "some balance" into an "obsession with KDSS" but i find that, honestly, the "obsession" is quite the contrary, with ill-informed and ill-conceived (not you, per se) KDSS-bashing generating nonsense as seen here in this very thread. (i always recall a member who hadn't even yet purchased a 5G, but had edited his signature to read it would be "definitely WITHOUT KDSS". ok, yeah, whatever.) the FUD surrounding KDSS is very real.I don't know this for a fact, but they most likely removed KDSS because of reliability/compatibility concerns. I'm sure the real engineers were iffy on if KDSS could work at Toyota reliability standards with the TRD lift and they did not want to spend the time or money testing it out. Somewhere along the line Toyota has pushed info down to dealers... saying that KDSS and lifts are not compatible. Wrong or right, it is seems to clearly be their view on the topic.
Additionaly, it does not take a genius to look at KDSS with a lift on and see that the bushings and angles up front are all bound up. Is it a big deal, no. Will it impact how long the bushings last... absolutely.
I'm not saying a lift is a major problem with KDSS. I'm saying it is not recommended from Toyota's perspective. And there are some quirky things that do happen with some (not all) of them once lifted.
As for the sunroof... That is pretty standard practice on many performance packages. Keep the weight down and off the roof. It does not make a huge difference... but the spirit of it makes sense. Not to mention the loss of headroom..
Again, like I have said many times. It is a personal choice with pros and cons. I just feel it is worth giving an alternative point of view since most people that come here get the impression that you can't live without it.
And think about this. Whatever the TRD pro is.. Toyota knew every single auto magazine... would be reviewing it and giving their impressions with tons of publicity.... (which is worth millions) So if KDSS made it so much better and capable... they would not put it on to save a few dollars..
precisely."TRD Pro has Xreas which provide greater articulation"?
HUH
BTW, my T4R is a TE, non-KDSS. I'd skip the KDSS as unnecessary and just something else to maintain.
Tr4 owners are a diverse crew... but I'm in your camp, but I think you meant to say... a Front locker. They all come with a center diff lock.2014 TE non-KDSS here. The best vehicle is a simple one....while T4R's are not simple, no need to make them more complicated on purpose.
Do it!
(and if toyota is listening delete crawl control, KDSS, ATRAC and all the other stuff and give more ground clearance and a center locking diff for SR5 or TE = winner!)
2014 TE non-KDSS here. The best vehicle is a simple one....while T4R's are not simple, no need to make them more complicated on purpose.
Do it!
(and if toyota is listening delete crawl control, KDSS, ATRAC and all the other stuff and give more ground clearance and a center locking diff for SR5 or TE = winner!)
apologies to OP for derailing his thread with this. and to be clear, i'm not fomenting a pissing match between you and myself. it's just that you state you're trying to inject "some balance" into an "obsession with KDSS" but i find that, honestly, the "obsession" is quite the contrary, with ill-informed and ill-conceived (not you, per se) KDSS-bashing generating nonsense as seen here in this very thread. (i always recall a member who hadn't even yet purchased a 5G, but had edited his signature to read it would be "definitely WITHOUT KDSS". ok, yeah, whatever.) the FUD surrounding KDSS is very real.
we're both smart enough to know that a lift isn't incompatible with KDSS, despite what Toyota says. similarly, Apple tells me i can't install a 3rd party SSD in my Mac, but that isn't true either. in both cases, it's corporate CYA. and in the case of the Pro, it's not the reason Toyota dropped KDSS when they went to production. i mean, honestly, it is simply not credible that a 1" front-only lift would create any genuine compatibility/reliability problems that would require onerous endurance testing on Toyota's part. the decision to drop KDSS as it was featured on the prototypes was simply due to marketing, product mix, and maximal margin considerations.
same with dropping the sunroof. weight savings? off the roof? to accomplish what? counterbalance the nosebleed-inducing change in the vehicle's center of gravity due to the Pro's 1" front-only lift? not credible, either.
i honestly kind of admire your Pollyanna perspective that Toyota set out to build "the best" when it made the TRD Pro but, i'm sorry, it's really just wishful thinking. in truth, they set out to build the best low-volume, high-margin 4Runner they could. and to do so it was necessary to make careful considerations of the existing product mix and pricing tier — and make compromises to hit the necessary mark.
true, some manufacturers build supercars; totally unattainable by the masses, but inspiring a halo effect of desirability that elevates the entire brand and product lineup. that, however, is not what the TRD Pro is.
the Pro is all about marketing, and of course Toyota knew it'd get a lot of press out of it. they also knew that auto reviewers — both pro and bro — have their heads up their collective asses, so they'd truthfully not receive the kind of critical consideration you imagine. here's just one such cherry from the Pro intro, where the reviewer says it has the "XREAS system and front and rear remote reservoirs"... nope. not even, buddy. there's scores of this misinformation in nearly every review. (not just of the Pro; all models... and all makes, for that matter.) Toyota knew damn well that dropping KDSS had just about zero downside for them outwardly, but it'd be all upside inwardly as it'd help keep their margins high and healthy.
i know you had a bad KDSS experience on a friend's vehicle. i get it. i respect it.
i don't relish sounding like/playing the role of the KDSS evangelist here, but i do find it a bit bizarro world that the refrain tends to bash KDSS, which is one of the true high-end features that trickled down to the 4Runner from the GX and Land Cruiser. whether or not KDSS is the right choice for anyone's needs and personal application is entirely up to them, but it is what it is.
Pretty much, but have it made as a 2016+ by Toyota and I would pretty much buy it without ever seeing any other details.Sounds like some folks here want my Jeep. 4.0L I6, 6spd manual, manual transfer case, manual locks and windows, AM/FM radio, 2H/4H/4L, front and rear lockers. Done.
See your point, but they are actually pretty darn simple for a 2010+. Just remove the ADD and put on manual locking hubs and it is mostly tech from the 1980s.There's no such thing as a "simple" 5th gen 4Runner--KDSS or not.
See your point, but they are actually pretty darn simple for a 2010+. Just remove the ADD and put on manual locking hubs and it is mostly tech from the 1980s.
Sounds like some folks here want my Jeep. 4.0L I6, 6spd manual, manual transfer case, manual locks and windows, AM/FM radio, 2H/4H/4L, front and rear lockers. Done.
Eeeeexactly. If people don't like the high-end innovation and engineering trickling-down from Land Cruiser and Lexus, then get the rolling wind tunnel that is a Jeep.
2014 TE non-KDSS here. The best vehicle is a simple one....while T4R's are not simple, no need to make them more complicated on purpose.
Do it!
(and if toyota is listening delete crawl control, KDSS, ATRAC and all the other stuff and give more ground clearance and a center locking diff for SR5 or TE = winner!)
BTW, my T4R is a TE, non-KDSS. I'd skip the KDSS as unnecessary and just something else to maintain.
Care to elaborate on what you mean with your statement? What are you referring to with "maintain"?!? I'm not trying to funny, I would just like to better understand your statement. Thanks in advance.
Every additional system will require some type of maintenance. For example, a 4WD system has an additional differential compared to 2WD. That differential requires maintenance and is a potential source of mechanical failure.
Since the OP's original post basically states he won't have heavy off-roading, KDSS doesn't seem warranted. Just my opinion, which is what the OP requested. . .
No scheduled maintenance for KDSS. Just be careful ordering things like sway bar bushings and front lower control arms.
It will never require maintenance for the life of the vehicle. The exception would be visual inspection every10K or so. Unfortunately there are very few qualified to even know what they are looking at. Basically you visually inspect the major components, hydraulic lines and cylinder rods and bushings. When I had my TE I did it myself every oil change.
if the best vehicle is a simple one, why even get a TE? Why not an SR5? If we are afraid of things failing, why are you encouraging he buy a vehicle that has an e-locker and all the fancy computer controls that are just sitting there waiting to fail and cost money.