Florida School Shooting

Status
Not open for further replies.
Get a rope and save the state a lot of money.

Agreed.

attachment.php

What you call a case study I call grasping at straws.
 
Everytime you get stumped you whip out the old "grasping at straws" line

I think you’ve got me confused with someone else. Mark Twain once said “It’s better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt.” - just something to think about.
 
That’s a new low for this thread. Racist and narrow minded.

it's not though, it's the reality of the history of gun control. look at gun control changes in the late 60's, those were do to the black panther party arming themselves and the summer riots of '67
 
Guns are not the problem. The problems are the ills of society and the mind.
Timothy McVeigh did not use a gun; he used what almost every hard-working American farmer uses to grow food for his family and others.
 
Last edited:
Guns are not the problem. The problems are the ills of society and the mind.
Timothy McVeigh did not use a gun; he used what almost every hard-working American farmer uses to grow food for his family and others.

And in the last 23 years we have had 2 other major mass casualty building bombings (9/11, boston marathon). Yet we have mass casualty school/public shootings on an almost monthly basis. Ill take 3 in 23 years...

I mean I agree mental health is a huge part of this, but why can't it it should be a two pronged attack?
 
Guns are not the problem. The problems are the ills of society and the mind.
Timothy McVeigh did not use a gun; he used what almost every hard-working American farmer uses to grow food for his family and others.

Yet, after this bombing the US government started regulating the purchase of fertilizer....

"In the years since the bombing, scientists, security experts, and the ATF have called on Congress to develop legislation that would require customers to produce identification when purchasing ammonium nitrate fertilizer, and for sellers to maintain records of its sale. Critics argue that farmers lawfully use large quantities of the fertilizer,[194] and as of 2009, only Nevada and South Carolina require identification from purchasers.[194] In June 1995, Congress enacted legislation requiring chemical taggants to be incorporated into dynamite and other explosives so that a bomb could be traced to its manufacturer.[195] In 2008, Honeywell announced that it had developed a nitrogen-based fertilizer that would not detonate when mixed with fuel oil. The company got assistance from the Department of Homeland Security to develop the fertilizer (Sulf-N 26) for commercial use.[196] It uses ammonium sulfate to make the fertilizer less explosive.[197]
 
Yet, after this bombing the US government started regulating the purchase of fertilizer....

"In the years since the bombing, scientists, security experts, and the ATF have called on Congress to develop legislation that would require customers to produce identification when purchasing ammonium nitrate fertilizer, and for sellers to maintain records of its sale. Critics argue that farmers lawfully use large quantities of the fertilizer,[194] and as of 2009, only Nevada and South Carolina require identification from purchasers.[194] In June 1995, Congress enacted legislation requiring chemical taggants to be incorporated into dynamite and other explosives so that a bomb could be traced to its manufacturer.[195] In 2008, Honeywell announced that it had developed a nitrogen-based fertilizer that would not detonate when mixed with fuel oil. The company got assistance from the Department of Homeland Security to develop the fertilizer (Sulf-N 26) for commercial use.[196] It uses ammonium sulfate to make the fertilizer less explosive.[197]

Hey we have one of those laws for guns too! I have to show my Identification everytime I buy a gun, and the chemical "taggant" is kind of like one of them gun serial numbers stamped on the side.
 
And in the last 23 years we have had 2 other major mass casualty building bombings (9/11, boston marathon). Yet we have mass casualty school/public shootings on an almost monthly basis. Ill take 3 in 23 years...

I mean I agree mental health is a huge part of this, but why can't it it should be a two pronged attack?

Agree, too.

I am in the middle.
I favor the attempt to make sure only those properly trained and qualified (including mental stability) should be allowed to own guns. However, I also believe that despite what the government does to control guns, the law-abiding citizens would have the mellowed versions while the bad guys will still have the stronger guns. (Just like during prohibition, when the bootleggers had faster cars than law enforcement)

The reason there may never be a favorable middle-ground on gun control or freedom to own guns is not because of the guns but because of the POLITICS. The politicians are merely using the topic to gain favor. One side gains votes by being pro-gun control, the other side gains votes by allowing everybody to own guns without checks.

So while, it's amusing to see the debate, I am not hopeful that there would be a solution.
 
Just to clarify.
Any comments I made were only meant to make/stimulate conversation, not to attack anyone or their religions or social belief.

I feel terrible for anyone that's had to live through the killing of their child.
I could not even pretend to know what that's is like.
 
Just to clarify.
Any comments I made were only meant to make/stimulate conversation, not to attack anyone or their religions or social belief.

I feel terrible for anyone that's had to live through the killing of their child.
I could not even pretend to know what that's is like.

And I think that's terrible, but that doesn't change my mind or my stance about gun control.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,309
Messages
3,554,071
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top