zopperman
Moderator
crap you guys are the same age too... hmm. We're meeting him in Boston right now. Zak Knudson sound familiar? lol.
Nope, but I'm driving through Boston later tonight...
crap you guys are the same age too... hmm. We're meeting him in Boston right now. Zak Knudson sound familiar? lol.
lol really... haha.
I'm still forming my whole thesis but all the data points to them as being useless for reasons like that.
and I just wanna prove all the liberals at my school wrong :lmao:
Your thesis for what? College senior? Masters Program?
Gun buyback programs DO very very slightly lower the number number of guns in said zip code. They do NOT lower crime in any way or lower the # of guns on the streets.
Any person liberal or conservative who has taken a few economics classis should be able to tell you this. In fact the NPR show Freakonomics did a whole podcast on it.
The reason these programs are a waste is because guns are statistically not likely to kill someone. Each gun causes a death every 10,000 years because there are so many millions of firearms and 99.99xxx% of the guns don't harm anyone in a given year. My uncles gun haven't harmed anyone, my neighbor, my co-worker etc. There are so many guns that the existence of a gun isn't any indicator of a future death or accident. Swimming pools kill 100x more children per household that has children.
Also the programs don't work for the obvious reason that those who really need a gun, those likely to use a gun do not give them up. The criminals don't give up their guns, just the (mostly poor) folks who had an old gun in their attic and would be glad to trade it for a best buy gift card.
I asked what degree level this research is for because a internet forum is hardly a good place to get a polling sample.
but yeah there is little evidence to contradict their failure. However nearly all studies have been conducted in an interrupted time series
I just think that the common sense reasons (which I listed above) for why these programs do not work are pretty hard to overcome.
. You get the rare person that has suddenly decided post-public-shooting that guns are bad and they turn in their grandfather's WWII 1911 or something.
I'm writing my thesis on these and I know we have a lot of gun guys on here, just wondering if anyone has personal experience with them
I don't know if I was late to answer, but my mom and dad recently adopted a baby boy right after birth from a friend in Louisiana who couldn't afford to give him a "perfect" life. Since in a couple years he will be running around the house, we participated in a buy-back to get our AR-15 out of the house. The money given back of course, wasn't nearly what we paid, but we were just happy to get rid of it, but, really, why did we have an AR in the first place? I have no clue. I think that's the feelings going through the heads of most participators: they just want to get rid of it, it's not all about the money.
And yes, we are very pro 2nd amendment, I shot my first gun when I was like 5, we have around 10 weapons right now, including 3 hand-guns and a concealed license.
^^^ also, you could have sold it to somebody who will enjoy it for years to come rather than having it destroyed. I wouldn't crush my extra car because I didn't need it, even if it was unsafe to have around.
We just wanted the most hassle free method to sell it, and when our town was doing a buy back it was far simpler to just get rid of it there. My family really doesn't care (sorry to sound like a huge snob) a couple extra bucks in this situation.
And a car and gun are way different scenarios.
It was our choice, you guys could do it your own way given the opportunity.
I don't see a lot of good coming from the buyback programs. No criminal type is going to go a sell a piece that he used in a crime.
So, the only thing coming out of these is to further disarm the law abiding citizens.