I posted on another thread concerning the ABS. Just wanted to chime in here. I have driven 4 or 5 different vehicles with ABS systems, and I agree that they are well designed, and for a good purpose. They do optimize stopping ability when they function correctly. The issue is not whether or not ABS is an efficient system. Normally it is. That doesnt mean you cant have a flawed system that needs some kinks worked out. What we're talking about here is the particular ABS system on the early third gen 4runners (apparently 96-98). I have the 98 sr5, and can say that it does not function the way the ABS does on the other vehicles Iv felt ABS on (honda accord, toyota tundra, pontiac grand am, ford taurus). For some reason Toyota had some design issues with it those first three years. Honesly, as Brian and others have said, its terrible, to the point of being dangerous. A few weeks ago I rolled out into an intersection going about 10 mph, because ONE of my tires hit a patch of ice. The other three were on solid concrete. But that one tire engaged the ABS, which, frankly just doesnt do what it is intended to. Rather than assisting stopping power, it entirely removes it. The 99-02 runners (even though they are 3rd gen) dont seem to have the same ABS system. I imagine the good people at Toyota worked out the kinks. But I think one would need to drive mine or a similar runner for themself, to really understand it. I'll stop rambling now.