I agree. The vast majority of law enforcers are corrupt. And hardly anyone who is prison actually is guilty. Just ask them. When I need help I call the local felon, who was probably wrongly convicted by corrupt officers as ND prosecutors.
That is neither true, or on point. The point is that preemptive law enforcement is not constitutional. Making a hidden compartment, or hidden room, or any sort of secrecy, a crime, because it might be used for criminal activity, is throwing our constitution to the wind.
Preemptive law enforcement has always, until of late, been ruled unconstitutional.
Preempting crime, based upon behavior that harms no one, or causes no property damage, is insane. It basically declares that someone might commit a crime, therefore they need to be punished.
Criminalizing a secret compartment, with out any evidence of an actual crime, is clearly a 4th amendment violation. It the state saying you have no right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.
As well it presupposes that if you wish to exercise the 4th amendment, you must be a criminal.
Arresting someone for having a hidden compartment in their car, without any other evidence of crime, is like measuring some ones head and placing them in asylum, or on a work farm, because the shape and size of head indicates they will engage in criminal activity or become mentally ill, two cases that actually happened in the US and Europe.
My DNA statement, while sounding out of line, was to make a point. The proponents of eugenics dream of the day, when they can decide, based upon DNA code, who lives, who dies. Preemptive law..
