When the media asked him what's his opinion on DD's support of him. His reply was something like "I don't know enough about him" to give an opinion. Then he, or more likely his camp, released a statement denouncing DD. He had lots of rallies and on many occasions accused Hillary of calling him and his supporters racist, etc. But he never once, ever, said he denounce DD and other racist groups. But you gotta ask, do they have his back because he shares the same belief?
The gun example was just that. An example. Was trying to say she wanted to create another hoop or two to jump over. Do you or people like you truly believe that's infringing on the second amendment? That she wants to take your gun away? I honestly think her plan will no solve anything. Crazy folks are gonna get their hands on it regardless.
In 2015 she said if elected she will fight the NRA and if congress won't act she will take executive action on gun control. She is in favor of being able to sue the manufacturer of a firearm if it is used in a crime. How many time would they have to be sued before they went out of business. Should we be able to sue Toyota if I am hit by a drunk driver in a Toyota. Or any driver sober or not? Her "extra" hoops to jump through would do nothing but waste tax payer money as criminals have never and will never go through a background check to get a firearm.
One of her main supporters in California a state that will most likely vote Hilary Dianne Feinstein said if she could she would ban all guns and make everybody turn them in
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Dianne_Feinstein
This tends to be the attitude of the lock step democrats. Ban and confiscate all firearms they deem dangerous. Once again only law abiding citizens would comply not criminals.
As to the psyc evals yes I do think those infringe upon my 2nd amendment rights. If you have been convicted of a felony crime or institutionalized for mental health problems then you can not buy a firearm legally. If you start making people take psyc evals to purchase a firearm then you are subverting due process of law and therefore infringing on the 2nd amendment.
As I asked earlier. Would anyone who supports restrictions/more hoops/delays on the second amendment support similar laws on the other amendments? Say the 1st amendment. Freedom of the press, religion, petition, assembly, speech? Say making the press have the government vet their stories before they are released? A registration of all signs you have carried at protests/assembly's, registration of what religion you are?
How about the 5th amendment. Being forced to incriminate yourself at court?
Or the 8th amendment forbidding cruel and unusual punishment?
Once you set a precedent of modifying one it make the rest open to modification.
As to David duke. Every 4 years he says something stupid and then disappears for another 4 years. The sad fact that had trump continued to bring David duke up in press conferences he would have given more PR to Duke. That's a fact of the matter. I do not know why trump didn't say what some hope he would say. But Reverend Sharpton and Reverend Jackson have both said very racist comments and yet the media people never get on the left wing candidate for not denouncing them?
How about all the other celebrities who are racist but the left I quiet about them?
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/01/walter-e-williams/the-hilarious-racism-of-al-sharpton/
http://downtrend.com/71superb/top-25-racist-quotes-from-liberals-leftists-and-entertainers
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6sUjlle7ZVo
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk