sport2004
Member
This will be an X-REAS tear out.
Looks like I will get the 6112's for the front. With the settings on them at minimal lift, 3/1...L/R, (which is stated in the instructions to compensate for driver-side sag, although I don't know why one click difference would not be enough), it looks like there will still be at least an inch of overall front lift.
I could leave the stock springs (100K on them) in the rear with new 5100's, but I like the rake and def don't want to get into negative rake territory. Anybody venture a guess on whether this would happen with the old stock springs?
Next, if I don't go with the stock springs, given my goal, research here seems to point to FJ springs with the lowest lift potential. If the frame is lifted the same, in the one inch range, both front and rear, I'm OK with that.
Am I missing anything, or does the above seem generally accurate? Appreciate any insight.
Looks like I will get the 6112's for the front. With the settings on them at minimal lift, 3/1...L/R, (which is stated in the instructions to compensate for driver-side sag, although I don't know why one click difference would not be enough), it looks like there will still be at least an inch of overall front lift.
I could leave the stock springs (100K on them) in the rear with new 5100's, but I like the rake and def don't want to get into negative rake territory. Anybody venture a guess on whether this would happen with the old stock springs?
Next, if I don't go with the stock springs, given my goal, research here seems to point to FJ springs with the lowest lift potential. If the frame is lifted the same, in the one inch range, both front and rear, I'm OK with that.
Am I missing anything, or does the above seem generally accurate? Appreciate any insight.
