...so, this is not just ONE politician or even one state.
...but for it to be proposed just show how stupid liberals can be..
There are plenty of smart liberals.
Have an awesome day!
Well, IF you ever find one, then please show him/her to me. You probably have better chance of finding Big Foot or Lochness. It is lovely for you to strive for something that does not exist.
Thanks in advance. Have an awesome day too.
I don't particularly like you.
I don't particularly like you.
Claiming intellectual superiority on one hand while choosing to be willfully ignorant and proud of it on the other.
Yeehaw.
Well, I was referring more to the liberals in office that are responsible for this bill. Secondly, this not about me...so, regardless how you think about me, the big question is...DO YOU AGREE WITH HAVING BACKDOORS ON YOUR PRIVACY?
nope.
I definitely do not like the people that coordinated the creation of these bills, but totally saying that all liberal minded people are dumb and the scum of the earth is quite ignorant.
Ignorant...like how you equate Paris terrorist attack victims as being not significant because work ladders kill more people? Or like how you make fun of microcephalic infants due to Zika with the Beetlejuice movie reference and picture?
Oh yeah, i am very proud not to be associated with folks like you. Call me whatever you want, but it is pretty damn clear who the ignorant liberal is here.
My factoid was about Americans, not French victims, bud.
'They' can snoop on my phone all they want, I couldn't care less. 'They'll' get to see exciting text messages asking me to bring home various grocery items and loads of pictures of my kids pulling silly faces. Plus, 'they' will still have no legal authority to access any 'backdoor' until a federal court agrees there is reasonable suspicion of a national security threat and approves the process.
The proposed bill is ridiculous, we can all agree on that. Like many other state level laws, it would would be virtually useless and impossible to enforce and has no chance of ever being passed. I wouldn't support this type of bill.
I think there's a fundamental difference between the ability for the manufacturer to decrypt or unlock a device versus hacking into accounts, since nearly all successful hacking attempts are achieved through user generated avenues, like lack of personal security practices or well disguised phishing scam.
'They' can snoop on my phone all they want, I couldn't care less. 'They'll' get to see exciting text messages asking me to bring home various grocery items and loads of pictures of my kids pulling silly faces. Plus, 'they' will still have no legal authority to access any 'backdoor' until a federal court agrees there is reasonable suspicion of a national security threat and approves the process.