One of my family members used to have a Navigator years ago but I haven’t really looked into the new ones in detail.
Having some GM connections I tend to lead more towards an optioned out Yukon Denali, but I can appreciate them having a general passion for cars and trucks. Denali we rented for a road trip and it really was that much nicer than being in a 4Runner for extended periods of time, but I feel it’s too big for general city use at times. Navigator would probably fall into the same for me.
The Black Label Navigator with the 450HP Twin Turbo v6 sounds pretty nice but I would rather have the naturally aspirated V8 of a Yukon Denali or LX / Land Cruiser. At that price range 85-100k, all of those options are open for consideration.
Our next purchase is going to be a luxury SUV, but since we do off-road, I always end up back in the GX / LX camp. After wheeling with my GX buddy, off-roading cocooned in luxury, actually something I can get used to coming from my SR5 4Runner.
The new Navigator is light years ahead of the GM counterparts, including Escalade and Denali. The 3rd row on these GMs are basically worthless since the 2nd row canNOT slide forward (or backwards). And you basically sit in the 3rd row with your knee against your chin...so, you have to get the long Denali XL to even get half-decent room back there.
The Navigator 3rd row is much roomier than Land Cruiser’s 2nd row...thanks to Navi’s IRS! The luxury part of the Navigator pretty much blows everything out of the water within that price range ($70-100k).
Now, off-roading, that is where Navi is weak at. I don’t think that you can even get 4-LO and it does not have skid plates.
If you want Navi’s size/comfort + off-roading, then you need to get Ford Expedition XLT with FX4 package. That will get your 4-LO, smaller rims, rear electronic LSD (apparently very good LSD), and skid plates. But, the problem is XLT is missing two major things (for me): LED headlights and decent sound system (B&O audio). You can get higher end Expedition + tow package that gets you 4-LO and LSD but you miss out on skid plates.
Oh, and the Ford/Lincoln SUVs come with Apple CarPlay.
When I saw the new Navigator I threw up in my mouth ����������
And for that much money, you’ll see a Land Cruiser in my driveway
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You’re right. Land Cruiser is an excellent SUV from a expedition point of view due to its off-road prowess and quality standards. But from convenience, luxury, and practicality for a family of 5+, it is pretty bad.
The problem is that 3rd row is a joke (worst than even the GM’s SUV). Heck, even the 2nd row is not that roomy! No room for toes under the front seat. The materials INSIDE the Land Cruiser is a joke, esp at $85k. FAKE WOOD. Cheap ass plastic handles...but hey at least it is painted plastic, right?!!

.
And then you get to the fuel economy...dismal. Just bad. And then you sprinkle some 8-speed automatic tranny failures...and well, that polish Land Cruiser heritage you bought for $85k is a bit tainted.
For me and my family of 5 (and sometimes requiring 3rd row), we’re looking at either Toyota Sequoia vs. Expedition in next year or two. I want LOW range. Sequoia interior is not great (good JBL system like Land Cruiser, but no CarPlay) and fuel economy is really bad but it comes with a stellar proven reliability (still using old trusty 6-speed auto). It is also very roomy on a slightly smaller footprint than Expedition. I would love to get Navigator but it is too expensive and no LOW range. Land Cruiser is great but price vs. what you get is kinda rough. Lexus GX/4runner is just too small...and 3rd row is non-existent. Or i can just get another minivan....