Falls, after reading your response, i am not sure if you agreed with me or disagreed with me....
Ok, you stated initially above that the BFG rode crappy after 40k miles...then later you wrote that it rode crappy after 25-30k miles...which is it??
The reason i brought up REVOs was because REVOs are well-known to have a high-tech mixture of rubber compounds to counteract the effect of aging and wear. And yet, despite this, it still rode crappy after 40k miles, according to you. My point is that ALL tires (esp. ATs and MTs) will show considerable wear and tear (including negative effects on ride comfort) at high mileage.
In fact, if you look on the Nitto website, then you will see that the Terra Grappler (P-rated version) has a treadwear rating of 500. REVOs (P-rated) has a treadwear rating of 500. I know, treadwear rating cannot be compared between two different manufacturers. However, the ratings can be used to make approximate guess as to the lifespan of the tires. In other words, the Nittos and REVOs have similar (approximately) lifespan if everything else being equal. LT-versions of the tires have probably similar lifespan. (Of course, the reason that we cannot compare the BFG AT KO to these tires using this "approximation method" is because all BFG AT KO are LT-rated.)
Therefore, my thought process in bringing REVOs into the discussion is quite valid and logical...at least from where i am sitting!
Again, i am not defending BFG more than any other tire. Please read my initial post again. In fact, what you and Josh wrote above are an exact duplicate of my initial response in this thread!
