Opinions on Yokohama Geolandar H/T-S?

Not winter tires

Guys, Geolandars are very good, but are definitely NOT winter tires. They can perform OK while you're in snow, but get zero traction on ice. I say it from experience, so be warned.

If you look for true all-season tires, look no further - Goodyear 4 Seasons Vector. I don't know any other all-arounder tire that can beat it on snow, ice or any other surface.
 
my .02¢

Central Wisconsin resident, new to 4runner ('04) and any vehicle this size. Other drivers include a CR-V and an Elantra, so several thousand pounds lighter. Works @ home, drives highway, city, back country roads and very minimal off-road. Car is mostly a school bus during the week and a recreational vehicle during the weekend.

The T4R came with the Geo's H/T's nearly new in 16" standard sizing. The ride quality is/was fantastic on the highway and part of what ultimately sold me the vehicle. Relatively quiet, smooth and fair traction. And just like others have mentioned... then there's winter. I hesitate to really bash these tires, but they are aweful in the snow, snow over hardpack, snow over ice and on ice. Let me qualify.
1. on all snow, seemingly regardless of speed, they will plow when trying to turn. You may want to go right, or left, but the tires don't. They go the direction the mass of the vehicle is travelling ( I think it's called linear momentum) and the traction the tires offer is not enough, in either two or four wheel drive, to redirect the direction of travel.
2. the abs threshold is ridiculously low. barely tapping the brakes will send abs into conniptions... and because the point of abs is to allow you to steer when braking and the traction offered by the tires cannot overcome linear momentum (or whatever the correct phrase is), the benefits of abs are completely negated and stopping distances feel greatly increased.
3. that being said and while sometimes 2wd wouldn't get me started perhaps as quickly as I'd like, I never had much of a problem getting started in 4wd. they certainly slipped but it never caused much of an issue that caution couldn't fix.

That being said, the first two points were enough for me to peel the tires off of the car and replace them with something else. This, despite probably only having 1 more month of winter and having the tires be less than 4K miles old.
I went to a shop and tried out a mechanics truck that had GY wrangler silent armors. they were a "drastic" enough improvement that I was satisfied (1) I was not imagining it, (2) I would realize significant benefits from a new tire and (3) be happy with my investment over the useful life of the tire.
While not a perfect tire (still sliding around plenty on ice) they are probably 40%-50% better in snow, snow over hardpack and snow over ice. In fact, they were so much better that driving into turns in snow that it felt almost unnatural. Unnatural as in "there is no way the truck should be able to do this". In an effort to keep this in context, I've never driven anything else of this size in snow and perhaps it could be that the truck should naturally be able to do it and the tires are simply "that bad".
I now perceive myself to be driving the truck much harder with the new tires. I feel like i can drive into turns, that there is a significant reduction in traction control "events" and that there is a noticeable/obvious increase in threshold where the ABS would have normally engaged. Additionally, while control is not perfect, I can steer while ABS is engaged and the car will respond -vs- plowing into snow.
Of course, I could have backed off of the throttle, driven much more defensively and dealt with it. It was just my opinion that the performance was unacceptable and worthy of an investment in improvement. Anyone that would not have to deal with any snow events, can put up with exercising more care with this tires would/may feel absolutely comfortable with these tires. I freely admit I was fine with them 9 mos. out of the year.
 
Geolander HT-S = aweful in snow

Over the summer, I bought a used 4th gen Toyota 4Runner SRS V8 4x4 as a mountain biking/beater "winter" vehicle and it came with new Yokohama Geolander HT-S G052 tires. The ride on dry roads were very plush and very confidence inspiring. Until recently, I loved the tires. It wasn't until the first major snow storm this past weekend (5-6" new snow) that I realized how much I disliked the tires, as they are actually quite dangerous to drive in winter conditions.

On new fresh snow, the grip was acceptable. It wasn't until I got on packed snow or ice that I found myself being quite scared driving a 4x4. I found myself sliding around quite bit. On corners, I'd easily understeer (no tire bite) and if I barely gassed it, I'd suddenly find my rear end breaking loose and I could not correct the direction of travel by steering inputs--I just had to let the car spin/slide to a stop. Quite discerning actually, especially with how careful and slow I was driving. To confirm that it wasn't just a fluke, I tried a frozen parking lot to get a better feel for the tires, and it exhibited the same behavior--little bite on turns and you could easily induce an immediate and uncontrollable spin (while turning) with some gas input. Next, even on a very slight decline, trying to slow down from 15mph, I found myself sliding down on a stretch of packed snow until I hit a patch of pavement to stop me--I was glad no cars were around that I could have slid into. Even my previous BMW X5 did quite a better on an admittedly car-biased/on-road tire, Michelin Energy MXV4.

These Geolander HT-S are not confidence inspiring at all and like others have posted, in my opinion, dangerous in snowy conditions. So much that I've ordered a new set of Michelin LTX M/S2 for installation this weekend. While these HT-S tires would be great in southern, warm climates, it's not worth the risk of life and limb driving on such a "loose" feeling/non-grippy tire on winding mountain, snow-covered roads.
 
I bought my 00 Limited that has Geolander HTS this last June- I live in South Dakota.

I had the Geolander ATS on my 92 Bronco and they were bad@SS. Ive driven 4x4s my entire life and most of the time I didn't even need to use it on my bronco with the ATS... In 4x4 it was unstoppable.

My T4R came with Geolander HTS 265-70R16s at about 75% tread on them.
We just had our first snows in the last few weeks and I have never felt so uncomfortable on snow or ice. Literally terrible performance on the snow especially on hard packed and ice like SD is known for. Braking is even worse they have ZERO bite.

As someone mentioned earlier they have zero side bite either. if you are in two wheel drive and even touch the throttle on the corners you will be facing the wrong direction before you know what happened. I have to be in 4x4 constantly with these tires. And not to toot my own horn but I am a very seasoned winter driver. If I had children I would feel safer in the Girlfriends Grand Prix, these stink. Im getting a set of ATS installed this week. I may keep the HTS to switch on for summer driving just to use them up. Unless someone wants them for 100.00 :)
 
Update: Michelin LTX M/S 2 vs. Yokohamo HT-S tires in winter

As an update, I just got my new Michelin LTX M/S 2 (highway all-season) 265/70R16 tires installed to replace the Yokohama HT-S (highway all-season) tires. As we still have the packed snow and ice from the past weekend’s storm (it’s been in the teens for the high temps), I thought I’d try the same roads and parking lot to compare back to back snow and ice grip. Again, my 4Runner is a V8 model with full-time 4WD.

Dry pavement. On dry pavement, the Michelins are very comparable in noise (maybe slightly quieter) than the Yokohama HT-S tires. The ride and handling is also comparable, with the Michelin having a very slight edge. Nonetheless, I’d be happy with either as they are very comparable.

Packed snow. Night and day difference. These Michelins make you feel like you’re almost driving on dry pavement. On turn-in, they actually turn where you want to go, like a good, quality tire is supposed to do. On moderate gas inputs, the car speeds up and turns where you want to go. You have to gun it pretty hard to try to swing out the rear end, and even then, the traction control would kick in to make sure you won’t go in a spin. The Yokohamas would, at turn-in, just plow (i.e. won’t turn direction very easily), and if you tried to do anything more than a slight gas input, your rear end would immediately just swing out and before you can correct snap-on oversteer, you would find yourself in an uncontrollable spin—and this was at a mere 10-15 mph. I’m glad I found this out before I attempted to go up some of the winding mountain snow/ice covered roads for ski season, where the results could have been disasterous.

Ice grip. The Michelins gripped significantly better. You’ll still slide a bit on ice, but the traction control kick-in seemed much less aggressive and I stopped with what I felt were acceptable distances unlike the Yokohamas where I just kept sliding and just did not know when I was going to stop.

The Yokohama HT-S tires are a great and quiet tire for 3 seasons and decent for light, fresh snow on flat ground. Any packed snow or ice driving, would require extreme caution. Driving on declines is asking for trouble and most likely will warrant a call to your insurance agent to go towards your collision deductible. Based on my experiences, I would not trust these tires on mountain roads in the winter. My switchover to the Michelin LTX M/S2 tires (as can be said of some other’s experiences with other brands) are night and day difference over the Yokohama HT-S tires in winter conditions. I like the Yokohama brand in general, but this particular tire model can not be trusted on packed snow or ice.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,317
Messages
3,554,129
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top