tbst
New member
This maybe surprising to some of you, but I like guns, in their time and place.
Regarding home defense, I think a long barrel gun, a shotgun is by far the way to go for the novice gun owner, like myself. Sure, you can have a .45 magnum under your pillow, but if you can't hit the broad side of a barn it is worthless as t!ts on a nun.
With a shotgun, hitting to kill shouldn't.
I plan on buying a Springfield XDm 9mm in the next few weeks. However, I'd much rather use my 10/22 on an intruder than a handgun I am not proficient with.
As far as keeping one chambered, without a doubt this is the more fail safe way regarding home defense. However, I think it is far more likely that a kid/family member/friend is likely to come in contact with your weapon than a burglar/zombie, which is why I think it is much safer not to keep one chambered. I think that concept deserves some merit. But that is just me.
Regarding liability, obviously the not chambered is decreasing your liability. The neighborhood kid who breaks into your house and finds your gun can pull the trigger all day and never kill his counterpart without one being chambered. Also regarding the liability issue, killing the intruder is definitely the way to go, unfortunately, as others have pointed out.
In a two story house there is no way I would go downstairs to confront the burglar. Very rarely do wannabe heroes end up heroes, but than again, that is just me... TV is replaceable. Come up the stairs though...
To answer the OP, Federal for handgun and some cheap stuff for long barrel. If the gun/ammo malfunctions it wasn't meant to be my day.
Not trying to start a debate war. Just adding to the conversation.
Regarding home defense, I think a long barrel gun, a shotgun is by far the way to go for the novice gun owner, like myself. Sure, you can have a .45 magnum under your pillow, but if you can't hit the broad side of a barn it is worthless as t!ts on a nun.
With a shotgun, hitting to kill shouldn't.
I plan on buying a Springfield XDm 9mm in the next few weeks. However, I'd much rather use my 10/22 on an intruder than a handgun I am not proficient with.
As far as keeping one chambered, without a doubt this is the more fail safe way regarding home defense. However, I think it is far more likely that a kid/family member/friend is likely to come in contact with your weapon than a burglar/zombie, which is why I think it is much safer not to keep one chambered. I think that concept deserves some merit. But that is just me.
Regarding liability, obviously the not chambered is decreasing your liability. The neighborhood kid who breaks into your house and finds your gun can pull the trigger all day and never kill his counterpart without one being chambered. Also regarding the liability issue, killing the intruder is definitely the way to go, unfortunately, as others have pointed out.
In a two story house there is no way I would go downstairs to confront the burglar. Very rarely do wannabe heroes end up heroes, but than again, that is just me... TV is replaceable. Come up the stairs though...
To answer the OP, Federal for handgun and some cheap stuff for long barrel. If the gun/ammo malfunctions it wasn't meant to be my day.
Not trying to start a debate war. Just adding to the conversation.
Last edited: