It seems to me that too many people posting on this list don't realize no shop is in business to do favors. They aren't there to build the coolest trucks, they are there to make money. If they provide a quality service, they are entitled to try to make money. I get that we are driving 15-20 year old trucks not worth much money, but you can't blame the shop owner for that.
There is an old saying, and I do mean old, in the automotive world.
You wouldn't bring your own eggs and bacon to have the restaurant make you breakfast, why do you think it's ok to take away part of the shop's profit.
The internet age has changed things, and this is a much more accepted practice. But it is a false economy. More an more small shops just can't survive, so we ALL will be forced to visit the well capitalized shops and pay more for less. You can bet they won't allow you to bring your own parts in either.
Get's off soapbox.
:frusty:
Do they make them or just rebrand them?
For $1800 I don't think an OME lift is the best for your money.
Why not go with Toytech if you have that much cash. Seems like a much better use of your money.
I always thought that ARB made them, but I'm not sure...
If they didn't already have the parts on the shelf, there's no call for a markup. An honest shop should charge an honest price for the labor they're providing and that's it. Again IMO, of course - you or anybody else is obviously free to run your own shop your way. If you want guys to stop trying to bring in outside parts, stop overcharging for them.
ARB owns Old Man Emu/Dakar (and IPF, and Warn, and Thule, and fifty other companies I can't remember right now).
An honest shop should charge an honest price for the labor they're providing and that's it.
So what you're saying is if a business has to special order something for you they should just charge you their cost since they didn't have to stock it? If you have tile put down in your kitchen, the contractor should sell you the tile at his cost since he special ordered it, and just make his income on installation labor? If the local auto shop has to get a starter from the parts store to fix your car, they should sell it at their cost since they make their money on installation labor? .
I run a small business, and I'll explain why you're wrong here.
To start with, there IS labor in ordering parts. Someone has to research them and order them, then someone has to receive them when they arrive, and check them for damage, then someone has to put them on the shelf until the customer gets there, and log them somehow so everyone knows where they're going and they don't get lost. This process is basically the same whether it's a $1500 part, or a $5 part too, so don't get bent out of shape over a substantial markup on cheap parts. The labor involved is still the same.
Second, it costs money to buy these parts for the customer. When a shop orders parts or you, they're basically giving you a short term loan, from the time they order the parts to the time you pay for the job. (Unless they're charging a deposit up front of course). We all know there are costs involved in borrowing money. In most cases this is going to be a very short term, but customers cancel appointments all the time, sometimes temporarily, and sometimes completely.
And that brings us to another cost associated with the parts. Dealing with returning them if the customer doesn't show, or something doesn't fit right.
Now, if you show up with your own parts all those costs are on you instead of them, but so are the responsibilities. If something doesn't fit, it's on you. You're going to have to pay them the labor to figure that out, and then the labor to correct it. If they bought the wrong parts chances are they're going to eat that labor.
The bottom line is ordering parts isn't something you should expect a shop to do for free. There are legitimate costs and risks associated with it, and because of that there should also be a profit associated with it when things go right. There HAS to be to offset the losses when they don't, and when you're dealing with aftermarket automotive parts things go wrong all the time.
Those things are all part of your overhead for running the shop though. Be honest and include them in your labor rate. Nickle-and-diming your customer by padding parts charges so you can advertise a lower labor rate isn't ethical, not unless you disclose up front that you're selling them the parts at higher than retail prices. If you tell the customer for example "2 hours of labor and $200 for parts" for install of a $100 part, that's lying (obviously I'm pulling these numbers out of thing air). If you tell the customer "200 hours of labor, $150 for parts, and $50 for parts handling", I'd have much less problem with it because the customer now knows it's actually 2 hours of labor plus a ridiculous overcharge on a $150 part, and they can choose to look for another shop that doesn't charge so much (for the very strenuous work of making a phone call and then letting the UPS man in the back door). But nobody does that, not that I've seen. They either charge a straight rate for parts, or they overcharge (and don't disclose). And if they don't disclose that X dollars of the parts charge is actually a handling fee, then their customer (like the OP) thinks that's the actual retail cost of the part. That's cheating, and I would never knowingly do business with an outfit that includes cheating their customer as part of their business model.
The bottom line is ordering parts isn't something you should expect a shop to do for free. There are legitimate costs and risks associated with it, and because of that there should also be a profit associated with it when things go right. There HAS to be to offset the losses when they don't, and when you're dealing with aftermarket automotive parts things go wrong all the time.
I forgot to address this part specifically. I'm not expecting anything for free, I'm just expecting to be billed honestly. If the part costs $X and the labor to install costs $Y and the shop wants to charge $Z for ordering and handling the part, and they're upfront about it when they quote me itemized charges prior to doing the work, that's all on the up and up and I've got no quibble. Or if the shop charges a labor rate high enough to cover the parts handling and a straight retail price for the part, that's cool too. What I'm objecting to is the practice of overcharging for a part and not telling the customer they're doing it. That's completely unethical, and I'm pretty black and white on that stuff - if they're going to lie to me about how much they're charging and why, what else will they lie to me about? I'll take my business to a shop that charges me honestly, because they're much more likely to do the work honestly as well.
Again, not trying to point any fingers, and if you're running a business and my opinion is hurtful then I apologize for that. Maybe it will be helpful to you to know that there are customers out there explicitly avoiding business run as described? Or maybe not, whichever.![]()
Why would I include the cost of ordering parts into my labor rate? That makes no sense at all. They're two different profit centers. The actual retail cost of the part is whatever I want it to be. I'm the one selling it! NO ONE is charging customers at cost for parts. NO ONE. They wouldn't be in business if they were.
Exactly what I'm saying. It doesn't cost the tile contractor or auto garage any extra to get those, and so there should be no charge passed on to the customer. A tire shop is a different matter, because they are both a retail outlet and a service outlet. I don't have to have bought tires there to get tires installed there, and if I buy their tires I'm not required to have them install them too, I can take them anywhere I want. See the difference?
We're discussing a case where the customer has a solid quote up front and knows he can buy the parts cheaper on line. Not a case where a shop is slipping expensive parts in after the work has started. Two completely different scenarios.
Call up your local tile contractor and see if he'll work that deal for you. Tell them you want them to special order some carpet but you're only willing to pay their cost, but you'll pay full price for installation. Since they're making money on the installation and not stocking the carpet, it's only fair. I'm guessing they'll tell you that's not how their business works. Go to the Toyota dealer and tell their service department you are only willing to pay cost for the parts but you'll pay full for the labor. They make plenty of money selling cars so labor only for service work is only fair. They'll probably tell you that's now how their business works. (For that matter, tell Toyota you're willing to buy their new 4Runner but you're only willing to pay for the cost of materials, labor, engineering and other real costs - that's all [since that's only fair - those are the real costs and charging more than that is not fair] - they will probably suggest you contact Nissan.) Ask a contractor to build you a house and tell him you'll pay full labor but only his cost for materials. I'm guessing you won't find many contractors (still in business) who do that. I could go on and on - roofing contractors, HVAC contractors, etc. That's not how most auto shops work either. They are a retailer (sell parts) who does service and installs parts (he sells). That's why they buy parts at wholesale and mark them up. They have to make profit (and should) on everything that comes through their shop. If you don't like that, or like their price, you can go somewhere else. That's the free market.
Because it's overhead. And your last statement is factually incorrect - I've had a couple different install jobs done at commercial shops, and I've NEVER been charged over retail for the parts they ordered and installed. Not once.
In fact, the last time I had a shop order and install parts for, the shop got a discount on the parts in question because they were a high volume orderer and they charged me less because of it. I got the parts themselves at exactly the shop's cost, under retail. The only other item on the bill was the shop's labor rate. And they're a big shop - I'm not going to name drop because I happen to be working there now (I didn't at the time), but we're not talking some no-name back alley garage here. This is a major industry player, doing business exactly like you say NO ONE does, and being super profitable about it at that.
So yeah, if you're padding your customer's bills on parts because you think everyone else is doing it, you might wanna think again. There are still customers that value honesty in business practices, and if they know you're padding your bill, they're avoiding you and you're losing business. Something to think about, huh?
You're completely off base. When my wife takes her car in to Toyota to get work done, she gets an itemized bill with 1) the parts cost (which is the same price I can buy them for at the parts desk down the hell), .
He knows now, because posters here told him. He didn't know when he was provided the quote because the shop he went to didn't disclose it (or maybe they did? I haven't seen the work order they gave him). That's the part that you're missing, the part that I'm objecting to. If the part costs $X at retail and the shop tells the customer it costs $Y, they're lying to them. We're not quibbling over how much the shop wants to charge, that's entirely up to the shop. We're quibbling over how the shop wants to itemize those charges, and you appear to be defending the practice of lying to your customers. If that's not the case and we're talking past eachother, please let me know so we can stop fighting.
You're completely off base. When my wife takes her car in to Toyota to get work done, she gets an itemized bill with 1) the parts cost (which is the same price I can buy them for at the parts desk down the hell), 2) the labor, billed in hours, and 3) shop fees (motor oil, grease, whatever). Costs are disclosed as their actual costs. When I had my roof done, the roofing company billed me the parts cost, the labor charges we approved prior to hiring them, and a materials disposal fee, all itemized. And they included their receipts from the roofing supply and the dumpster company to show they weren't padding the bill.
He knows now, because posters here told him. He didn't know when he was provided the quote because the shop he went to didn't disclose it (or maybe they did? I haven't seen the work order they gave him). That's the part that you're missing, the part that I'm objecting to. If the part costs $X at retail and the shop tells the customer it costs $Y, they're lying to them. We're not quibbling over how much the shop wants to charge, that's entirely up to the shop. We're quibbling over how the shop wants to itemize those charges, and you appear to be defending the practice of lying to your customers. If that's not the case and we're talking past each other, please let me know so we can stop fighting.