Thai
Elite Member
International Experts Say It's OK to Keep Eating Red Meat at Current Levels
By Amy Orciari Herman
Edited by David G. Fairchild, MD, MPH
An international panel comprising nutrition experts and primary care providers, among others, suggests that adults aged 18 and older continue their current consumption of unprocessed and processed red meat. The recommendation, based on findings from five systematic reviews, is ranked as "weak" and is based on "low-certainty" evidence.
Here's the rationale behind the guidance, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine:
A decrease of 3 servings per week was associated with "a very small and often trivial absolute risk reduction" in health outcomes, such as cardiovascular events, cancer incidence, and mortality.
Omnivores generally reported red meat as essential to their diets and were unwilling to change their consumption, so a "trivial" benefit from cutting back is unlikely to motivate dietary changes.
Editorialists write that the recommendation "is sure to be controversial, but it is based on the most comprehensive review of the evidence to date." They add that animal welfare and environmental concerns "might be more likely to sway people" to decrease their red meat intake. "And if ... some receive a small health benefit as a side effect, everyone wins."
By Amy Orciari Herman
Edited by David G. Fairchild, MD, MPH
An international panel comprising nutrition experts and primary care providers, among others, suggests that adults aged 18 and older continue their current consumption of unprocessed and processed red meat. The recommendation, based on findings from five systematic reviews, is ranked as "weak" and is based on "low-certainty" evidence.
Here's the rationale behind the guidance, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine:
A decrease of 3 servings per week was associated with "a very small and often trivial absolute risk reduction" in health outcomes, such as cardiovascular events, cancer incidence, and mortality.
Omnivores generally reported red meat as essential to their diets and were unwilling to change their consumption, so a "trivial" benefit from cutting back is unlikely to motivate dietary changes.
Editorialists write that the recommendation "is sure to be controversial, but it is based on the most comprehensive review of the evidence to date." They add that animal welfare and environmental concerns "might be more likely to sway people" to decrease their red meat intake. "And if ... some receive a small health benefit as a side effect, everyone wins."