Also, I think you should start a Go Fund Me page. I know nothing about them except it's a site that people can show support for you by donating money for your cause. You have a David and Goliath thing going on and am sure people will support you, even people who aren't a part of the T4R.ORG community.
I Pray you truly will intertain the idea of allowing us to support you. I'm sure others would have no problem donating a couple bucks to help out.
.it does cost them money too! And they would not just flush money down the toilet for no good reason (aka, no infringement).
Just my opinion.
My only argument with this, is it does costs them some money up front absolutely. But to take out competition and thus becoming one of the only options to produce these its worth the price now to pay for legal fees.
Instead they could actually ask a reasonable price or maybe even comeup with a better design than WM.
But to legally pursue all other companies or opponents, really does show the mindset that Gobi does have.
Take out the competition and then have a monopoly.
^^^^yes Thai, I do understand your point, I just question why Gobi feels it necessary to take Josh to court. I mean, honestly how much money do they think they can actually get out of him. That's if he has any left after lawyer and court fees. I guess I just wanted to see Gobi place a call to Josh or certified letter saying they have a problem with his design and to stop. It's not often I wear my rose colored glasses, and just think it could have been handeld differently. Who knows, maybe I'm just upset I didn't get my rack ordered in time and so I'm a little biased. Either way, we will see what happens, maybe Gobi will soften their blow a little once they start to see a negative impact on their social media sights.
-I would refute, actually guarantee that GOBI has more money than WM, and due to this definitely can pay out and just do several continuations and delays to further put him under.But, what if they (Gobi) are wrong? IF WM designs are original (and I assume that it is easy to do this side by side), then Gobi just lost a huge amount for nothing. They are not Apple. I am pretty sure that they do not have piles of money on the floor to wipe their ass.
Why do they (Gobi) have to come up with better design just because WM came up with something similar (+/- infringement)? The question is...who came up with it first? Why must the originator (assuming Gobi) now have to change their ways?
This is all assuming that WM did infringe on Gobi's design. IF I was a business person, then I would definitely want a monopoly!It is up to my competitors to compete.
-I would refute, actually guarantee that GOBI has more money than WM, and due to this definitely can pay out and just do several continuations and delays to further put him under.
-My argument for the change to design, is if they feel threatened and believe instead of coming out with a better product to stomp the little guy out they just decide to claim he stole their idea. I'm pretty sure Gobi was not the first company to ever produce a roof rack. So as stated I'm not saying change ways to accomdate WM, I am saying because clearly they are not the EXACT same if they truly want to make a better name for themselves than they should produce a rack that can do that. Clearly they felt effected because WM was providing not only a great product, but at a competitive price. Which also for a one man operation he would have more overhead as well compared to Gobi producing these in mass quantities.
-And I stand with your last statement, I just guess we disagree on who had the first rack albeit I don't believe them to even be close.
A roof rack is something that goes above the roof of the vehicle, maybe has some crossbars, maybe hold a light bar or an easy way to attach one, removable sunroof area or not, possible mesh floor?
Other than those similarities which all roof racks have. The route which Gobi has chosen to pursue its competition is sleezy.
Good points Thai. First, I was not ever contacted by the other guys. Had I been, I very likely would have folded right up as I've sworn these racks off 20 times, at least. Now, however, I sortof have no choice but to push back since doing nothing means I'll be living on the street, based on the demands and tone of the lawsuit.
As for R&D costs: I did this in my driveway with tools most of you have. Outside of the shape and mounts, what else is there? Roof racks aren't exactly precision instruments. I hope they didn't pay engineers for crying out loud.
Theres only so many ways to slice the low profile roof rack bread. It still has to fit the same roof afterall. Even tube construction has its own "rules" if you will which somewhat sets where cross members or other parts and pieces need to be. Outside of those constraints, they're different from every angle.
Ok, I'm out again, thanks everyone!
Like you said...there is only a few ways to do a rack...why do THEY (Gobi) have to go the extra mile and redesign something that they did??? Should it not be WM's job to come up with a better design to beat Gobi than (blatantly) copy an existing one?????
Remember, the cost of a product is NOT just the cost of labor & materials. The cost of a product also reflects cost of R&D to get the product to consumers' hands.
I fully understand the R&D aspect and costs, as I have stated previously and fully aware of start up company. What you keep ignoring and wanting to argue is that someone copied. As you stated where you stand you believe "WM blatantly copied". Where as I not only diasgree with that I also believe Gobi is taking an elementary way to distinguishing themselves from others. The only thing the racks have in common is they both sit on top of the vehicle. While I commend your persistence, you only keep touching on part of the issue. The reality is I don't believe the design was copied, and clearly Gobi feels threatened by competition, and thus ergo therefore the easy way is to get sue happy with other companies. Until you can fully understand that there was no infringement, because usually to get around copyright infringement the design needs to only be changed 30%. I believe not only WM to be more than 30% but again believe it to be completely different aside from the part they are both called roof racks.
It really isn't up to us to decide the fate of this. Thai, if you really want to dissect this just google pics of the racks and knock yourself out.