Rotopax

Register to hide this ad
Rotopax vs fuelpax



Anyone experienced any difference aside from price?


Rotopax = rotomolded plastic
+ strong
+ stackable
- small capacity
- heavy

Fuelpax = mold injected plastic
+ capacity
+ weight saving
- weak walls
- not stackable

I have 2 fuelpax. I will say that they do seem to flex and bulge much more than my buddy’s rotopax. I keep mine mounted on the roof (when needed), and the sun will make them swell much more than the rotopax. Rotopax are definitely more sturdy, but I don’t abuse the containers that carry my fuel (aka combustible liquid) for good reasons. I love my fuelpax - especially since they are 3.5 gallons each.

2ccbe3038ef0a2dce8abd9faeac025b3.jpg
 
I use a Rotopax. It discolors if left exposed to UV. Mine's mounted to the roof with their mounting plating and can be a pain in the ass to remove after a day on some elevated trails. Swells and bulges fairly quick. I've been pulling over every 30 minutes to vent it.
 
Last edited:
They're both expensive but the rotopax comes with a 10-year warranty instead of a 1-year. That would be my deciding factor.
 
I went with the rotopax for the stackability. And the durability doesn't hurt. It was a close call though: i like the price and capacity of the fuelpax.
 
Fuelpax here.

+Slightly cheaper
+theres a special right now where you get a free mount
-Shitty spout. Switch to the water spout
-Shitty warranty vs the Rotopax


I used to run mine on the roofrack but switched it to the ladder. to avoid the direct hit from the sun (depending on time of day i guess, but still reduced overall). No regrets here on my 3.5gal
 
I got my during the introductory sale when it was first introduced. Got my 3.5gal for $39. So far very pleased. No complaints really. It's like any other blow molded gas can. Walls feel very thick and durable. I did get the upgraded self venting spout so that works a lot better. If you don't need to stack cans then I'd fully recommend the FuelPax. If you need to save space and stack gas or water cans then I'd get the Rotopax fuel cans otherwise the Fuelpax should do fine.
 
I use a Rotopax. It discolors if left exposed to UV. Mine's mounted to the roof with their mounting plating and can be a pain in the ass to remove after a day on some elevated trails. Swells and bulges fairly quick. I've been pulling over every 30 minutes to vent it.

Liquid doesn't expand much with increasing temps.

Try setting it diagonally when you fill it to minimize the airspace, and you'll get more fuel in there as well. I get virtually zero swelling with my Rotopax, regardless of temps (never had to vent even after +7500' elevation gain).
 
I went with Rotopax. There was an excellent group buy awhile back.

Warranty is the best. One of mine was leaking from the seam, I sent an email and they sent a replacement right out with basically no questions asked. I just had to prove I had disabled the leaker by drilling a hole in it.

I get very little expansion, and have never vented them even while in the sun for a few 100 miles. Besides that it's pretty tough to vent them while they are mounted on their side.

They do fade, but so will most products being blasted by the UV rays. And really who cares if they fade? As long as they don't leak, I could care less.

Never tried the other products, except old school steel jerry cans.

4 gal Rotopax vs 5 gal jerry cans - So less capacity is a bummer, but on the other hand they are a lot lighter and easier to handle.

Rotopax easily mountable with cheaper hardware. -->Fuelpax uses same hardware
Rotopax easily lockable with expensive hardware.-->Fuelpax uses same hardware
Rotopax are stackable, they lay flat on my Gobi, with less wind resistance.
Rotopax price is ridiculous, but then again so is a Jerry can, so that's a wash. Fuelpax slightly better.
Rotopax come with the spout, (carried internal) so no need to find a place to store it or worse forget the jerry can spout laying on your bench. -->Fuelpax uses same builtin spout.
 
Last edited:
I really don’t care about the fading. It’s florida, everything fades. As long as the cans vent properly and don’t leak then the price is worth it. Thanks for all the info fellas.
 
I really don’t care about the fading. It’s florida, everything fades. As long as the cans vent properly and don’t leak then the price is worth it. Thanks for all the info fellas.
You'll also have less of a problem with venting since you live in Florida. The cans swell with elevation change and there's not too much of that in Florida.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk
 
...also to be clear, the swelling is caused by gases expanding. An empty or mostly empty pax or can will swell more than a mostly full one. Also, the swelling in Florida can be just as bad as the swelling in the mountains of Colorado and Utah. Trust me on this one. We had a can burst in the back of our boat going down the highway on the Gulf Coast a few years back. It was less than half full, and the sun baked it for 3 hours - not a rotopax, but this is true of any container carrying vapor or vaporizing liquids...
 
x2 Rotopax

We carry 4 - 3 gallon cans, never any leaks and we're not exactly easy when we ride :naughty:
 

Attachments

  • 20160626_101612.jpg
    20160626_101612.jpg
    82.2 KB · Views: 933
Anybody considering Rotopax do yourself a favor and also get the self venting spout which I think used to be called the international version.
 
Does anyone have any recommendations on the mounting hardware. $50 a pop is insane, they mounts will end up costing more than the containers themselves.

Has anyone been successful in using a cheaper and as effective mounting set?
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,304
Messages
3,554,041
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top