Social Media, Image Rights, and YOU!!!

LawnDart

Senior Member
Do you have a cool rig? Do you take photos of said rig and put them in the interwebz? Well hey, this post applies to YOU.

I wanted to pass along some advice that will either inform you, and make you think, "Damn, LawnDart is looking out for me, and is an okay dude!" or you'll grumble and have your opinion of me reinforced, "Ugh, that guy is a douche, die in a fire." Spoilers: I'm not a complete douche.

Back to the matter of photography, it doesn't matter if you're a professional or an amateur, because on the internet no one can tell you're a dog. The separation between professional and dude with an iphone really doesn't apply anymore. And because of that everyone is able to generate some pretty stunning content. The only difference is professionals can do so repeatedly, on schedule, for clients. Some of us pay our bills making pretty imagery. It's how I support myself, as do a lot of other people who combine our tradecraft with our hobbies.

The off-road world is small and yet expansive. There's a lot of off-road companies out there, but they're all pretty tiny, and if you asked them what their marketing budgets are they'd probably point to an employee with a camera, or their friend of a friend who's kid is rad with a DSLR. Basically they don't have a ton of budget. As a result they reach out to people on IG, Facebook, etc, and use user generated content.

That means YOU. Yes you, on the other side of the screen. What's important to know is understanding usage rights, and permissions. A lot of us, myself included, allow companies the use of our photos to assist companies or people we know, free of charge, because what's easy for us (taking decent photos) is actually hard and time consuming for companies that are too busy steeped in another task: making awesome shit for our rigs.

The relationship you want to maintain is one where a company ASKS in the use of your photos, and you grant it. Remember, your truck is your investment. The minute you snap that shutter you own that image. There's a misconception that if you put it on the internet it's fair game. That's not true. Even services like Instagram have TOS's that state that they can use your content for their own advertising, but they can't SELL your photos as you still own them even having uploaded them to their service.

This leads to something I've wanted to discuss for a year now: what happens when a big company takes your photos. What do you do? Who do you talk to? Why is it worth caring about?

A year and a half ago Toyota took one of my photos of my truck, and used it in a presentation at the Chicago Auto Show, during their opening keynote. It wasn't huge on screen, but it was there. As a photographer you quickly run the emotional gamut of "oh cool" to "hey...wait a minute" really quickly. Here's a company I love, taking my work, and using it for their own profit, when I'm writing checks each month to pay off my lien. In fact I'd be willing to bet a lot of users on this forum, and on IG, have had their work used by Toyota without asking simply because they didn't spot them.

Now there's a lot of people who'd look at this situation and say, "But I love Toyota, I'd be honored if they used my photo in a major venue's keynote, you're a massive douche to get upset!" The issue is that companies operate to make profit. They're using photography they didn't pay for to sell a product. Toyota isn't a mom and pop company that has no marketing budget, or legal department. This simply shouldn't have happened from a company that is as structured as Toyota USA.

The problem with intellectual property is that if you don't assign a value to something, and defend that value, it has no value. This is why defending IP is extremely hard.

Let me be frank and upfront, that I dislike litigious people. I think we make it far too easy to sue people in this country. It was implied a few weeks back via rumor that I sued Toyota. I did not. I've never sued or been sued by anyone. What actually happened is I spent 2 weeks writing emails, sending calls, and working with Toyota's social media venues to finally contact someone to say, "Hey, you used my photo without asking, STOP!"

I didn't want to contact them over paying for the image, but rather to stop using that image without permission. Anyways, 2 weeks go by and I finally get a call from Toyota's legal department. Having talked with lawyers before, it's an odd call because they didn't want to admit any fault, yet they wanted to apologize. Since they didn't want to discuss how it happened I'll present my theory, that some social media intern for Toyota's marketing department basically searched #trdpro or #4runner, and basically downloaded a few hundred images off Instagram. Maybe they didn't know better, or didn't expect anyone would care, but they screwed up. They screwed up big time. Had they reached out to each and every photo source and asked for permission, they'd likely have gotten the same photos without any headache. I know I'd have likely said sure, and it'd have never been an issue.

Instead it became a discussion of Toyota screwing up, and wanting to make the situation right, which meant the only solution they knew how to do: pay for the photo(s). I even asked for them to take a massive chunk out of my lien, but Toyota Financial Services is not the same company as Toyota USA, so they couldn't make that happen. The point being is that I was looking for a solution that didn't involve a check.

Ultimately Toyota USA and I agreed to a price that was based upon the cost of the photo, the cost I'd have charged to make that photo for them based on permits, insurance, equipment costs, and time. And in exchange they'd ensure that they'd put checks and balances in place not to mine social media for photos without expressly acquiring permission from the sources (aka you).

No suing was involved, just some strongly worded emails. And out of the hundreds of photos used I and one other photographer were the only ones to notice and bring up the issue with Toyota. As a result of coming to a deal with Toyota, I signed a photo release that asked me to wait a year before discussing the terms of the deal. For the past year I've wanted to write this post just to let people know what happened and how it's applicable to people on this forum and social media.

There are some truly beautiful rigs online, that people have poured their heart and souls (and wallets) into, and understanding how companies appropriate those photos is critical. I want to be very clear that if a company asks to use those photos you should consider it, as long as both parties understand how they'll be used, and you're not being taken advantage of. For a lot of us we spent 4 years in college, paid a ton of that education (I finally paid off my student loans 2 years ago), and work hard for our gear (I'm not sponsored and pay for damn near everything on my rig). So having that investment in time and money be respected, is critical.

It's easy for companies to just REPOST your photo, and it takes people to say "hey that's my photo, don't just use it without asking me!" before companies learn. The saying it's better to beg forgiveness than to ask permission, should not be the modus operandi of the companies we own products from.

Ultimately the point of this thread is to just caution people in knowing how their photos are being used, and to be aware that you have rights as photographers. I love giving away my photos when and where possible to companies that could not otherwise afford the services of a photographer. That give and take is based on appreciation. If you do not keep track of your photos, and assign a value for them, they have no value.

We love our trucks, we take photos of our trucks, those photos can have real value to companies, and managing the value is important.
 
Register to hide this ad
Yep. Agreed. The internet has made it easy to find and share content. But care should always be made to give proper credit, ask permission and at the very basic level, ensure respect and consideration is given to others who may work hard for what they have created.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Hate it. Hate it. HATE IT.

I used to be that "oh cool ________ used my photo," now it's "where's my money?" But you know what makes me even more irate? The well established companies that have the money to pay you, yet have the audacity to message you and say "can we use _______ photo? We'll give photo credit."

I've seen some of my work that was strictly for ONE company (this is all in writing) being used in multiple places. Clearly they were giving my work out (free from what I could tell), and then the websites they gave them to had the nerve to sell them.

It's tough to even talk to these people without blowing up.

I can see it being "cool" for the amateurs and what not, which it is. I had a few back when I first started shooting where I was fine with the 'high' of having my photos used, but in the long run it definitely hurts you and a lot of other people.

These people aren't paying you for the time it took you to drive to the places to get shots of your vehicles, or whatever you're shooting for that matter.

Don't settle for "we'll give photo credit." But it is a huge problem as there are thousands of others who will. I guess it's a matter of how much you think you're worth. In the beginning I was 0, now I get anywhere from a couple hundred to a thousand.
 
The upside here is that [MENTION=65614]Antman[/MENTION] will never have to worry about someone borrowing his blurry pics!!! :whistle: course when those Toyota engineers see the cup holder mod you know they are stealing it, did you patent it Jeff???



Good info Lawndart.
 
[MENTION=124732]LawnDart[/MENTION] is a douchebag.

No just messing. Thanks for the good info. I'd be pissed if any company used my pictures for the business except the small local shop that installed my lift. Let alone a multi billion dollar company.
 
[MENTION=124732]LawnDart[/MENTION] is a douchebag.

No just messing. Thanks for the good info. I'd be pissed if any company used my pictures for the business except the small local shop that installed my lift. Let alone a multi billion dollar company.

I've been described as worse. Someone on this forum described me as socially awkward, behind my back, lol.

The point of this thread is just to caution people to be aware of their work, and how it's used. It's NOT to dissuade people from being generous with their rigs and the photography of them, but to be critical when companies come knocking.

If you can be generous, be generous, but also be cautious about not being taken advantage of in your investment and skills.
 
Does using a watermark help this ?

Depends on how you do it. I watermark my sports photos in the corner, but I make it where it's not over the player, however cropping it out would in return cause the player to lose their head, arms, etc.

For nature it's more of a pain and really pointless IMO as the watermark would ruin the photo (if we're talking IG). Personal website however I watermark it. However if you have someone who is good enough, they can remove a watermark. That's why I don't post full-resolution images and make sure it'll look horrible if printed.

Keep in mind if you don't downsize the image for IG, you can get the full image right from there as well (or whatever original size you posted it in).
 
So... as someone that is "no longer" a professional wedding photographer, I have been in a similar yet not as high profile situation, and simple communications resolved the issue quickly.

As of today, the only company that I have authorized full usage of any photographs or post of my 4Runner in their media or advertisements is [MENTION=139789]RagoFabrication[/MENTION]. They contacted me after I installed their products, and I have given them authorization to use my shots from IG for their marketing.

I agree: we cannot be silent. There must be communication.
 
Thanks for posting this. I've had both good and bad experiences and agree that communication is key.

I work with college students and I'm always surprised/amused at how many of them fail to see the link between 'it's ok to steal intellectual property (music, movies, photos, books etc.)' and 'why can't I get a well-paying job producing intellectual property?'

At a practical level,
* Watermark. If they crop it out then they know they're stealing and you can increase the price when you catch them.
* Metadata should be added that marks the photo as copyrighted. Include your name and contact info and a rights statement, e.g.
Copyright 2017 Your Name-ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No reproduction of any kind without the express written consent of the author.

I have this done automatically when I import my photos into my cataloging software.

Note that Facebook strips this info out of your photos :mad:
 
I agree with you 100%. What's funny for me is if people ask I am good with sharing my photos but I hate when they use repost apps and the photo looks awful. Just message me and ask and I will send the original so it at least looks good when posted lol
 
Thanks for posting this. I've had both good and bad experiences and agree that communication is key.

I work with college students and I'm always surprised/amused at how many of them fail to see the link between 'it's ok to steal intellectual property (music, movies, photos, books etc.)' and 'why can't I get a well-paying job producing intellectual property?'

At a practical level,
* Watermark. If they crop it out then they know they're stealing and you can increase the price when you catch them.
* Metadata should be added that marks the photo as copyrighted. Include your name and contact info and a rights statement, e.g.
Copyright 2017 Your Name-ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No reproduction of any kind without the express written consent of the author.

I have this done automatically when I import my photos into my cataloging software.

Note that Facebook strips this info out of your photos :mad:

Effort. I am guilty of this more than I care to admit. I do not mark, brand, encrypt, or even edit the metadata. I am poor example. Kids, do as he says DEFINITELY NOT as I do.

Why? Because I am lazy, and photography is no longer what brings my money in. I am still part of the problem. I don't put the effort in. People "could" still make money off what I post publicly, and while I am trying to change my ways...

Honesty Level 5 here: it is not worth my effort for what I get in return. Sad truth of the matter, but I am being honest.

...but I am not Isaac level.

I agree with you 100%. What's funny for me is if people ask I am good with sharing my photos but I hate when they use repost apps and the photo looks awful. Just message me and ask and I will send the original so it at least looks good when posted lol

True story. Especially when you credit me in the post: at least make it my quality (as bad as it may be).
 
Anyone who knows photographers knows it's goes way deeper than this and is much worse than this. Photographers essentially have to have their own employees just keeping an eye out for work that is theirs and wasn't approved to be used. But we all know that's not gonna happen. 99% of photographers make no money. To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if 50% of the photographers who do reach to tell a business or whoever not to use their work are ignored, at least by big corporations. They know the average photographer doesn't have the legal resources they do.

Good information though, don't just take it without a fight.
 
If you take a lot of photos, especially good photos that get re-used, you should make it a point to officially register your photos with the US Copyright Office.

Why should you go through the trouble? The simple answer: money!

If someone reposts your photos or otherwise infringes on your copyright (your copyright is automatic, it exists the moment you create the work not when you register it) you can sue them but you are only eligible to win actual damages. If you are an amateur or small professional photographer it will be hard to determine and prove actual damages, so in most cases it won't even be worth your time to pursue.

However, if you have registered your photo with the US Copyright you can be eligible for up to $150,000 in statutory damages, that is you don't have to prove any actual damages to be eligible for the statutory damages.

The downside is that registering photos has a fee, you can register a group of photos online for $55.

tl;dr
if you want to protect your work, and take good photos that someone might want to use, spend $55 each year to register your photos and you can be eligible for $150,000 statutory damages if someone infringes
 
[MENTION=124732]LawnDart[/MENTION] interesting, thanks for sharing.

Since you mentioned there were hundreds of photos used, and only 2 people complained, that makes me wonder if the strategy was intentional. Cheaper to pay off the handful of people who will spend the time and energy to follow up than it is to reach out to hundreds of people while working on a deadline to get the presentation together and pay each one of them in advance. Maybe I'm just a cynical douche.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,316
Messages
3,554,120
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top